p in libressl in the next week or two and see what
happens
John
Begin forwarded message:
FROM: Vadim
SUBJECT: RE: [DISCUSS] MOVE FROM OPENSSL TO LIBRESSL
DATE: February 4, 2016 at 11:43:07 PM PST
TO: John Kinsella
Thank you for explanation, John.
I am not involved into CS security
p in libressl in the next week or two and see what
happens
John
Begin forwarded message:
FROM: Vadim
SUBJECT: RE: [DISCUSS] MOVE FROM OPENSSL TO LIBRESSL
DATE: February 4, 2016 at 11:43:07 PM PST
TO: John Kinsella
Thank you for explanation, John.
I am not involved into CS security
p in libressl in the next week or two and see what
happens
John
Begin forwarded message:
FROM: Vadim
SUBJECT: RE: [DISCUSS] MOVE FROM OPENSSL TO LIBRESSL
DATE: February 4, 2016 at 11:43:07 PM PST
TO: John Kinsella
Thank you for explanation, John.
I am not involved into CS security
improving security after
issues are found - that’s why security geeks like me are around. :)
I’ll see if I can drop in libressl in the next week or two and see what
happens….
John
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Vadim
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move from OpenSSL to LibreSSL
> D
John,
Can CS community decide that? From my point of view this is OS
distribution owner who does. OpenSSL is system package and you probably
can't skip it, unless you create your own Linux distribution.
Vadim.
On 2016-02-03 17:48, John Kinsella wrote:
Folks - another OpenSSL vulnerabili
Folks - another OpenSSL vulnerability was announced last week[1]. I believe our
current SSVMs are running Wheezy, so they should be OK according to [2].
This makes me ponder, though: Should we consider moving to LibreSSL[3] in the
future? For those not familiar, it’s a fork of OpenSSL with more
