Wido,
Please see my responses in-line below.
Thanks,
-John
>
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Jun 15, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> You really like typing long e-mails! :)
Not particularly, n
You really like typing long e-mails! :)
> Op 15 juni 2016 om 2:39 schreef John Burwell :
>
>
> All,
>
> We have been discussing whether or not the next release would introduce the
> need to increment the major revision number from 4 to 5 (i.e. become 5.0.0).
> While I think we are very close
I don't know if your date projections are any good but +1 to the overall
ideas you pose here ,John. As was mentioned in the other thread I would
include API refactor in one of the two (5- or 6.0.0)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:39 AM, John Burwell
wrote:
> All,
>
> We have been discussing whether or
All,
We have been discussing whether or not the next release would introduce the
need to increment the major revision number from 4 to 5 (i.e. become 5.0.0).
While I think we are very close to the time to have a 5.0.0 release, I don’t
think the next release will introduce any backwards compati
