Re: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 with XenServer7 support, and 4.10.0.0 RM

2016-12-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
10.x. Regards. From: Haijiao <18602198...@163.com> Sent: 23 December 2016 20:20:19 To: dev Subject: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 with XenServer7 support, and 4.10.0.0 RM Hi Rohit Thanks for your hardworking like Santa Claus ! Is that possible to include the PRs below

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 with XenServer7 support, and 4.10.0.0 RM

2016-12-23 Thread Haijiao
f they are tested/merged before 4.10/master freeze date. [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711/files Regards. From: Wido den Hollander Sent: 23 December 2016 18:19:38 To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 wit

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 with XenServer7 support, and 4.10.0.0 RM

2016-12-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
cloudstack/pull/1711/files Regards. From: Wido den Hollander Sent: 23 December 2016 18:19:38 To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 with XenServer7 support, and 4.10.0.0 RM > Op 23 december 2016 om 9:51 schreef Rohit

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 with XenServer7 support, and 4.10.0.0 RM

2016-12-23 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 23 december 2016 om 9:51 schreef Rohit Yadav : > > > All, > > > 4.9.1.0 was voted recently but did not receive a lot of attention in terms of > testing/voting, and several users reports on the list and privately that they > would want to have XenServer7 support. I agree with Marty and o

[DISCUSS] 4.9.2.0 with XenServer7 support, and 4.10.0.0 RM

2016-12-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, 4.9.1.0 was voted recently but did not receive a lot of attention in terms of testing/voting, and several users reports on the list and privately that they would want to have XenServer7 support. I agree with Marty and other users that it would be a great holiday present to release another