Rohit,
definite +1
Thanks,
ilya
On 7/20/14, 8:35 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,
I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward
with the first implementation starting next week but will be mostly
offline till 28th July.
Regards.
Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi guys,
There has b
+1. Very well-written FS and email, Rohit. Those open questions are very
valid, I added a little comment in your FS regarding the flow.
Thanks
-min
On 7/20/14 8:35 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward
>with the first implement
> On 20 Jul 2014, at 17:35, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward
> with the first implementation starting next week but will be mostly
> offline till 28th July.
>
+1 from me , most definitely.
Your email was clear, thanks fo
Hi,
I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward
with the first implementation starting next week but will be mostly
offline till 28th July.
Regards.
Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi guys,
There has been a lot of interest [4] around auth related problems in
CloudStach such as
Hi guys,
There has been a lot of interest [4] around auth related problems in
CloudStach such as -- SSO/SLO (single sign on / log out), 2-factor
authentication, role based network/IP/CIDR checking etc.
A lot of challenge in implementing them in CloudStack is because of two
divergent authenticati
