Then what about all fixes that went into 4.4-forward if they don't get picked
up that contribution will not be used at all.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 9:45 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>
> I don't like the idea. release (candidates) are on 4.4
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:43 AM,
Every commit in 4.4 is from 4.4-forward, that's why we create 4.4-forward I
think?
--Sheng
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I don't like the idea. release (candidates) are on 4.4
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
> > Yes that's how I did f
I don't like the idea. release (candidates) are on 4.4
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> Yes that's how I did for 4.2 and 4.3
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 6:28 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote:
>
> Daan,
>
> 4.4-forward should contain all the commits for 4.4.
Yes that's how I did for 4.2 and 4.3
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 28, 2014, at 6:28 PM, "Sheng Yang"
mailto:sh...@yasker.org>> wrote:
Daan,
4.4-forward should contain all the commits for 4.4. So 4.4-forward itself
should be able to make as 4.4, without merge back to 4.4?
That's what we want to
This is my thinking, as well.
In theory, 4.4-forward should be a superset of 4.4.
I don't think merging is required.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Daan,
>
> 4.4-forward should contain all the commits for 4.4. So 4.4-forward itself
> should be able to make as 4.4, withou
Daan,
4.4-forward should contain all the commits for 4.4. So 4.4-forward itself
should be able to make as 4.4, without merge back to 4.4?
That's what we want to have a 4.4-forward for 4.4. future release. It's
superset of current 4.4 branch.
Well, probably result in a force-overwrite. But I gues
H,
I tried merging 4.4-forward back into 4.4. This leaves us with a grand
big conflict. I have calculated that the number of not cherry-picked
not reverted commits is 185. I will start cherry-picking them at
moments $dayjob allows. and then send a mail again.
don't forget to read up on the proces
