> deleteCacheStore
>>>>
>>>> What are your preferred names for these 3 APIs? Let's get a consensus
>>>> before I change it to be more effective.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -min
>>>>
>>>> F
;>> From: John Burwell mailto:jburw...@basho.com>>
>>> Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:43 AM
>>> To: Min Chen mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>>
>>> Cc: Daan Hoogland
>>> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>, dev
>>> mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache
to be more effective.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -min
>>
>> From: John Burwell mailto:jburw...@basho.com>>
>> Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:43 AM
>> To: Min Chen mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>>
>> Cc: Daan Hoogland
>>mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com&g
teCacheStore
> >
> > What are your preferred names for these 3 APIs? Let's get a consensus
> > before I change it to be more effective.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -min
> >
> > From: John Burwell
> > Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:43 AM
> > To:
26, 2013 9:43 AM
> To: Min Chen mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>>
> Cc: Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>,
> dev mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Edison Su
> mailto:edison...@citrix.com>>
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming
>
> Min,
>
AM
> To: Min Chen
> Cc: Daan Hoogland , dev ,
> Edison Su
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming
>
> Min,
>
> That is my recommendation with a task ticket to make the consistent post
> 4.2.0.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Jul 26, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Min C
o.com>>
Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:43 AM
To: Min Chen mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>>
Cc: Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>,
dev mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Edison Su
mailto:edison...@citrix.com>>
Subject: Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming
Min,
Th
at bug based on
> this understanding.
>
> Thanks for your clarification.
> -min
>
> From: John Burwell
> Date: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:38 AM
> To: Min Chen
> Cc: Daan Hoogland , dev ,
> Edison Su
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming
>
> Min,
>
AM
To: Min Chen mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>>
Cc: Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>,
dev mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Edison Su
mailto:edison...@citrix.com>>
Subject: Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming
Min,
In my opinion, it is a blocker because it is very
July 20, 2013 3:18 AM
> To: dev
> Cc: Edison Su , Min Chen
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming
>
> NFS Staging it was in my recollection.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:30 PM, John Burwell wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> It was my understanding that we had a
t;>
Date: Saturday, July 20, 2013 3:18 AM
To: dev mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Cc: Edison Su mailto:edison...@citrix.com>>, Min Chen
mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>>
Subject: Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming
NFS Staging it was in my recollection.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013
NFS Staging it was in my recollection.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:30 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> It was my understanding that we had agreed to rename the "NFS Cache"
> mechanism to reflect that it is not a cache and remove the assumption that
> it will always be backed by NFS. Is my und
All,
It was my understanding that we had agreed to rename the "NFS Cache" mechanism
to reflect that it is not a cache and remove the assumption that it will always
be backed by NFS. Is my understanding correct?
Thanks,
-John
13 matches
Mail list logo