gain for the
whole CloudStack users(as the user
> base is almost zero), while fix the upgrade path from NFS to S3 will
benefit the whole community a lot.
> So, which one has the higher priority? Isn’t obvious?
>
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburwell@...]
> Sent: Friday,
e.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features
“I see prodded a facility to convert NFS secondary storage to object storage as
an enhancement where the lack of a migration path is a blocking defect.”
I have different vie
]
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:15 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Min Chen
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features
>
> Edison,
>
> Unfortunately, given the time remaining the 4.2 release cycle, the most that
> can likely be done is to rem
the higher priority? Isn't obvious?
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:15 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Min Chen
Subject: Re: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features
Edison,
Unfortunately, given the time remaining the 4.2 rel
:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:13 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: Min Chen
>> Subject: Re: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features
>>
>> Edison
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Min Chen
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features
>
> Edison,
>
> The old
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: Edison Su; Min Chen
>> Subject: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I have noticed during testing that the old S3 and Swift-backed secondary
>
>
> What you mean the old s3/swift sec
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:06 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Edison Su; Min Chen
> Subject: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features
>
> All,
>
> I have n
All,
I have noticed during testing that the old S3 and Swift-backed secondary
storage features are still available in the 4.2.0. It seems to me that they
should be disabled (given the late date), and removed completely post 4.2.0
release. Also, what is the migration/upgrade strategy for custo
