re to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:22 PM
To: Chip Childers
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
Cre
ent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:18 PM
To: Sangeetha Hariharan
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:28:33AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
> Then we can go with the option of reboot (start and stop) of all the system
effect?
>
> -Thanks
> Sangeetha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:21 AM
> To: Chip Childers
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to
: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
I'm also not confident that option 1 really fixes anything. The user has to
reboot their system VMS eventually, and even if we fix this one thing to help
them get by until they do, what other lingering i
I'm also not confident that option 1 really fixes anything. The user has to
reboot their system VMS eventually, and even if we fix this one thing to
help them get by until they do, what other lingering issues will arise?
On Mar 28, 2013 11:38 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 0
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:51:16AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
> Can we get a confirmation on the approach we want to take?
>
> 1. We are going to fix the router for the case - " if the router has
> upgraded its scripts, and then adjust how we call edithosts.sh" ?
> 2. Going to suggest a r
s) as part of Upgrade procedure?
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
Ok, found
Ok, found the issue. The 4.0 script in the system vm that adds DHCP
entries parses args like this:
# edithosts.sh -- edit the dhcphosts file on the routing domain
# $mac : the mac address
# $ip : the associated ip address
# $host : the hostname
# $4 : default router
# $5 : nameserver on default ni
We can look into it, my guess is that an existing script now has new and/or
different parameters. Perhaps it could be adjusted to be backward
compatible so people can reboot at their leisure. All just guesswork.
On Mar 27, 2013 9:21 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote:
> Hard to say. Sometimes functional
Hard to say. Sometimes functionality/implementation changes even though the
feature is the same.
On Mar 27, 2013 9:20 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Marcus Sorensen
> wrote:
> > Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x
> to
> > 4.0 as
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x to
> 4.0 as well. We had all of these new vpc scripts that added brand new
> functionality that needed to go on the virtual routers. The system VM
> template stayed th
Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x to
4.0 as well. We had all of these new vpc scripts that added brand new
functionality that needed to go on the virtual routers. The system VM
template stayed the same, even though new scripts were added via
systemvm.iso.
On Ma
There are two things, upgrade of system VM, and upgrade of software on
system VM. Any time you start a system VM the latest scripts get copied to
it. This isn't the same as using the new ipv6 template. I can understand
needing to reboot the system VMS if the scripts change, but its not the
same as
>> Deploying Vms in existing networks succeed. But Vms are not given any ip
>> address.
>> In router, I see that the mac address of the Vm is not populated correctly.
>> root@r-4-VM:~# cat /etc/dhcphosts.txt
>> 02:00:42:47:00:01,set:10_1_1_17,10.1.1.17,test123,infinite
>> -4,set:10_1_1_195,10.1.1.
STACK/Release+Notes
>
>
> > Please download vhd-util from
> http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util and put it in
> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/
> >
> > -Thanks
> > Sangeetha
> >
> > -Origin
> http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util and put it in
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/
>
> -Thanks
> Sangeetha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 2
il and put it in
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4
t; To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
>
> It should be fixed. This should be less difficult in the future, as long as
> we're not moving the config directories around again. I first tried copying
> the files over du
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:27 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
It should be fixed. This should be less difficult in the future, as long as
we're not moving the config director
iginal Message-----
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:45 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
>
> Hi,
>
> Requesting help to resolve the following issue, if you h
endif
I hope Marcus is looking at this now. Let's wait for his feedback.
Thanks,
Pradeep S
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:45 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgrad
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:57:14AM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Chip,
>
> Will check upgrade once Murali's fix is pushed. There are couple of more
> issues which seem to be fixed but kelven need to review and mark them
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1811
> https://is
ginal Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:07 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:14:32PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Requ
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:14:32PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Requesting help to resolve the following issue, if you have done upgrade.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1694
>
> Upgrade is failing - if there is anyone that can take a look at it during US
> time zo
Hi,
Requesting help to resolve the following issue, if you have done upgrade.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1694
Upgrade is failing - if there is anyone that can take a look at it during US
time zone that would be great.
Thanks
/Sudha
25 matches
Mail list logo
