Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
Hi @nvazquez;
You are right i am referring to volume based snapshots.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905
Hi, we currently hold vm snapshots like as vm backup, even if we destroy vm
with expunge. So that we could restore vm snapshot on future time. Does this pr
has any effect on our scenario
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977
great news ð thanks @ustcweizhou @kiwiflyer
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977
Hi, any news on this pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Hi @rhtyd we have got the required LGTM's now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Hi @kiwiflyer @nathanejohnson i saw that you are merged this fix and using
it on your ENA CloudStack branch, when you have time could you check the code
for possible LGTM's please.
-
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
hi @jburwell this pr does not delete any kind of snapshots, this patch only
prevents, solves a kind of timeout issue on code thats all, nothing more. This
is a 4 lines of small fix where
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Hi @rhtyd @jburwell,
With the comments of @ustcweizhou, could we start required tests and if its
all ok, could we merge this pr to upcoming 4.9.1.0 release please?
---
If your project is
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Hi @jburwell , i am so sorry but i do not understand, what you mean by
combining fixes under a single pr because this is a only single fix with a 4
lines of code change which only effects rbd
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
This is a really good enhancement for Ceph users, thanks to all
contributors ð :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Hi @jburwell , this is a missing 3 line of code fix which was occured
because of the fixes done in CLOUDSTACK-8302, CLOUDSTACK-9297. Those fixed
bug's are already in 4.9.0 release so the
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Hi, @ustcweizhou do we need to take any more action or inform some people
from ACS to take this PR to upcoming releases?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ozhanrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1451
Hi, last week we experience some problems because of the timeouts which
mentioned on this PR. Could we get this PR to upcoming versions asap please.
Without this timeout configuration
13 matches
Mail list logo
