Any process is better than what is being used right now.
git-flow is just a proven process that is working for folks who use it.
That is a fact.
git-flow somewhat enforces a process, especially if you use the git-flow
plugin:
git flow feature start 2345-eye-candy
git flow feature publish etc, e
Alena,
Check this out and see if it would resolve your concern regarding
maintaining multiple releases
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16562339/git-flow-and-master-with-multiple-parallel-release-branches
git-flow uses support branches to support releases that are not on master.
On Wed, A
"Once you merge release branch it on master/stable branch, you don’t lose
commit if you delete it. It’s like removing a feature branch once it’s
merged on master/target branch."
Correct. At t his point your "release" is in master. If you need to bug
fix, you checkout that tag from master.
Also, a
daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 24 July 2014 17:30
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] git workflow
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Tracy Phillips
> wrote:
> > Good read
> > http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
>
>
24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Tracy Phillips
> wrote:
> > Good read
> http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
>
>
> he agrees with our thread that every work sould start with creating a
> branch, doesn't he. I think we need to say that a lot of times
The best thread I have read in awhile...
Good read http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Leo Simons
> wrote:
> > lsimons
>
>
> has access
>
> --
> Daan
>
git-flow with master always golden would be a good method.
Right now the development model just isn't working.
fwiw, I am not a developer, just a tinkerer with git and some bash and a
lurker :)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Yep...what
Thanks for the update. This is good news.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:53 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Dave Scott wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following up from Tim's "Support pure Xen as a hypervisor" proposal last
> month[1] I'd like to start working on this and maybe even make
Very, very nice. I watched your videos a month or so ago.
Good work!
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Antone Heyward
wrote:
> I wanted to get some feedback on this as I have added it github. Hopefully
> it helps some get into using apache cloudstack and ma
Rafael,
Once you put XCP on, do you gain features that belong to Xenserver or is it
limited in someway?
The only reason I am not using Xenserver is that I have to manage it
differently than my other hosts.
Tracy
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Rafael
+1 to Daan.
Tracy Phillips
Weberize, Inc.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> -1 for postponing the feature freeze. It will amount to more features
> in the release. I'd rather shorten the cycle and do more releases then
> to pack more bugs in a single go.
&
If you could use font icons, that would be really nice..
(MIT License)
http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icons/
(Apache License)
http://getbootstrap.com/components/#glyphicons
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Brian Federle wrote:
> Right now the plan was to remove the icons, though if
I am a fan of Foundation's look (or Bootstrap even)...
http://foundation.zurb.com/
3d elements make it look dated, kind of like it does now. The less images,
the better imo.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage <
kel...@backbonetechnology.com> wrote:
> Hmm, maybe cut 2 copi
I agree with the respin.
Cloudstack is still a young open source project and we don't need any
negative press/tweets/blogs/gossip :)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailt
Matt,
Probably the contact listed in the whois
Domain ID:D150572512-LROR
Domain Name:CLOUDSTACK.ORG
Created On:07-Jan-2008 15:12:00 UTC
Last Updated On:12-Sep-2013 11:24:54 UTC
Expiration Date:07-Jan-2018 15:12:00 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Domain.com, LLC (R1915-LROR)
Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
St
+1 to Marty.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Marty Sweet wrote:
> My view is that when a feature is added the developer should give a short
> overview of how to use all of the items which have been added, a doc
> contributor can then write this up in a user friendly manner which is
> similar to
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:05 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 1:30 AM, Kelven Yang wrote:
>
> > You need to make sudo-ers no-password required
> >
>
> bad idea, someone compromises your account and he is root.
>
>
>
True. But they are on your box unauthorized, its just a matter of time
be
M, Kelven Yang wrote:
>
> > You need to make sudo-ers no-password required
> >
>
> bad idea, someone compromises your account and he is root.
>
> > Kelven
> >
> > On 9/4/13 4:10 PM, "Tracy Phillips" wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this has been discussed a few times on the list before.
>
> When I start up the CSMS, I get prompted for my password about nine times.
>
> I thought updating the sudoers file would fix this, but it still happens.
>
> Any thou
I really like markdown, very readable in the state that it is in before it
is converted to whatever else. I also like reStructuredText.
Outputting to different formats is important I guess, however, I would say
that most real reading that is done is done in html.
With that said, I love beautiful
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> [Animesh>] Any change should be done post 4.2
>
I agree, this should be post 4.2.
Kudos to you Sebastian!
I am glad to see it in Markdown.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
> > > By syntax highlighting do you mean marking 'code sections'? If so then
> > yes you can...
> >
> > http://daringf
I tend to agree. This is an Release Candidate, not an actual Release.
However, I am not so sure going forward that there should be a pure time
based release unless the their is a way to not plow through the release
dates. Perhaps having code freezes earlier in the cycle would help.
On Wed, Aug 2
23 matches
Mail list logo
