Hearty Congratulations, Bobby!
Well deserved.
Bobby has been actively helping with validation of MRs under review. Also
helping users in users list.
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, 13 December 2018 at 14:59
T
Hearty Congrats, Andrija!
Very well deserved.
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: "Tutkowski, Mike"
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Monday, 19 November 2018 at 09:57
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Andrija Panić
Hi everyone,
While it's good idea to bump up the current default VM template "CentOS
5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM)" to a newer version. I doubt the candidate would be
CentOS 7. Reason being the supportability of the hypervisor. The candidate
should be supported across all the versions of hypervisors that next ver
Congratulations, guys :-)
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Wednesday, 2 May 2018 at 9:28 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" ,
"priv...@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: John Kinsella and Wido den Hollander now ASF membe
What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: soundar rajan
Reply-To: "us...@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 12:59 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" ,
"us...@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Attached volume is not v
Hi Mike,
Hearty congratulations for the new role.
Thank you, Wido, for the good work in last 1 year.
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Monday, 26 March 2018 at 9:11 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" ,
"us...@clo
Congrats Gabriel.
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 7:21 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Cc: "gabrasc...@gmail.com"
Subject: Notice that Gabriel Bräscher now works at PCextreme
H
Hearty Congrats, Syed!
Well deserved!
Regards,
Sateesh,
CloudStack Development,
Accelerite,
Laurelwood Rd,
Santa Clara-95054
@accelerite
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus
Reply-To: "us...@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Monday, 9 October 2017 at 4:57 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Hi Andrija,
I’ve converted cluster-wide NFS based storage pools to zone-wide in the past.
Basically there are 2 steps for NFS and Ceph,
1. DB update
2. If there are more than 1 cluster in that zone, then do un-manage & manage
all the clusters except the original cluster
In addition to Mike’s sug
Congratulations Nathan, and Marc-Aurèle!
Well deserved!
Regards,
Sateesh
CloudStack Development,
Accelerite.
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Friday, 22 September 2017 at 10:01 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: New commi
From: Shreya Nair
Reply-To: "us...@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Tuesday, 4 July 2017 at 4:52 PM
To: "us...@cloudstack.apache.org" ,
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org" ,
"iss...@cloudstack.apache.org"
Cc: Vinay Patil , Siddheshwar More
Subject: DISCUSS : Vmware to Cloudstack migration support
Hell
Hi @Wido
Tried subscribing to commits mailing list, but got reply that I am already a
subscriber.
Here is the reply received
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
comm...@cloudstack.apache.org mailing list.
Acknowledgment: The address
sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com
was alread
Hi Rajani,
I will pickup CLOUDSTACK-9849.
Regards,
Sateesh
On 10/04/17, 11:21 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
@Nicolas and @Haijiao
Noted the PRs. I will see what all can be merged and do the
needful.
@All
Any takers for the VMware blocker (CLOUDSTACK-9849)?
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
>>Having this causes the ssvms to not deploy in dvswitch-based vmware
environments that have no vswitch portgroups (dummy etc).
@rhtyd can you please share the err
+1
Regards,
Sateesh
From: Rafael Weingärtner
Sent: 29 March 2017 02:16:09
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Retirement of midonet plugin
Dear ACS fellows,
We have discussed the retireme
AM, Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
>
> My version is 5.5 in both clusters.
>
>> On Mar 23, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
wrote:
Both ESXi hosts are version 5.5 and both
clusters are within the same VMware datastore.
>
> The source datastore and the target datastore
are both using iSCSI.
>
>On 3/23/17, 11:53 AM, &
>> On 23/03/17, 7:21 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
>>However, perhaps someone can clear this up for me:
>>With XenServer, we are able to migrate a VM and its volumes from a host using
>>a shared SR in one cluster to a host using a shared SR in another cluster
>>even though the source host ca
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
The point of specifying a host is in deploy request itself means
inclination towards using that host for instance. Hence I think default value
should be false.
While global
Hi Mike,
Is there any volume snapshot operation in progress for that ROOT volume, when
resize is attempted?
Regards,
Sateesh
On 07/03/17, 8:40 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
No VM snapshot.
I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also tried in the
Stopped state.
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1776
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1776
@borisstoyanov Can you please trigger tests for this PR? Tests could be
over any hypervisor/simulator as the fix is pretty generic.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862
Thanks @borisstoyanov
The 3 test failures listed in results doesn't seem related to the code
changes in PR.
```
2017-03-02 17:45:11,699 - CRI
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
Hi @karuturi This has test results as well as 2 LGTMs. I think this can be
merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
@harikrishna-patnala Thanks. Did not make the parameter as dynamic, to
avoid unexpected timeout errors upon timeout changes, for those VPC tier
configurations in progress.
---
If
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
Yes, @karuturi rebased with latest master. And changed base branch of this
PR to master. Please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862
@borisstoyanov @borisroman Can you please run trillian tests for this PR?
This already has enough code LGTMs, and needs tests for merge.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1872
@ping sureshanaparti @anshul1886
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841
@karuturi Checked the tests errors, they seem to be unrelated to this PR
code fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841#discussion_r103883712
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -1180,10 +1180,7 @@ public
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815
@karuturi This seems to be ready for merge.
It has 2 LGTMs and tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1253
@sureshanaparti Can you please investigate the two failures listed in
results from @cloudmonger?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
@karuturi @koushik This has 1 LGTM and test results without any failures.
Can you please review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900
LGTM for code changes.
Thanks @anshul1886 for the path.
@karuturi Seems this PR is ready for merge, as it has 2 LGTMs and latest
test results from @cloudmonger has 0
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
LGTM for code changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
ping @karuturi @koushik-das
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
@borisstoyanov, thanks for running tets.
I see 1 test error in the above results, this test has been failing in many
other PRs as well, and doesn't seem related to ch
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1872
@borisstoyanov Can you please run trillian tests for this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
@borisstoyanov Can you please run trillian tests for this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841
@borisstoyanov Can you please run trillian tests for this PR?
This already has enough code LGTMs, and needs tests for merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862
@borisstoyanov Can you please run trillian tests for this PR?
This already has enough code LGTMs, and needs tests for merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
@karuturi Seems this is ready for merge, with code LGTMs and based on test
results published by @cloudmonger ?
The 4 test failures seems not relevant to this patch with code
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862
ping @anshulgangwar @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861#discussion_r94216180
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@
import
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861#discussion_r94216151
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -123,12 +125,14 @@
import
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841
Thanks @sureshanaparti
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862#discussion_r94214404
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -5620,4 +5623,39 @@ private
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862
Thanks @sureshanaparti for review.
I have addressed that now. Pushed the code changes, please check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/775
LGTM for code. Looks like tests are successful too based on results
published by @bvbharatk
@karuturi Should we consider this for merge OR re-run tests again as the
previous
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1758
@nitin-maharana LGTM for code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1881
@karuturi As this PR is about removal of a deprecated configuration setting
which is no more referenced any where in the repo, can we merge this without
functional tests?
Or we
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
@sureshanaparti Travis tests ended with timeout. Can you please try force
push?
```The job exceeded the maximum time limit for jobs, and has been
terminated.```
---
If your
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
@sureshanaparti Seems build timed out. Can you please try force push?
```
[INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.3:findbugs (findbugs) @
cloud-plugin-user-authenticator-md5
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1872
CLOUDSTACK-3223 Exception observed while creating CPVM in VMware Setup with
DVS
Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-3223 Exception observed while creating CPVM in VMware Setup with
DVS
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1862
CLOUDSTACK-9704 Remove dependency on VmwareContext object to fetch systemVM
keyfile
Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9704 Remove dependency on VmwareContext object to fetch system
VM
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
CLOUDSTACK-9698 Make hardcorded wait timeout for NIC adapter hotplug as
configurable
Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9698 Make hardcoded wait timeout for NIC adapter hotplug as
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
@karuturi Can you please resolve the conflicts and rebase this branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
@rhtyd Travis is green for this PR.
Can this be merged based on LGTMs and integration test results?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
@rhtyd Thanks. Done with rebase against `4.9` branch, also changed the PR's
base branch to `4.9`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1827
@rhtyd Thanks. Re-based against 4.9 branch, and changed base branch to 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1841
CLOUDSTACK-9684 Invalid zone id error while listing vmware zone
Issue
=
While listing datacenters associated with a zone, only zone Id validation
is required
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
Thanks, @serg38, @borisstoyanov for reviews.
@karuturi @rhtyd Can you pleas trigger trillian tests for validation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot when
there are child VM snapshots
Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1827
CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while creating the CPVM in VMware setup
over standard vSwitches
Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9673 : Exception occured while creating the CPVM in
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1244
@rhtyd I think this would be useful for 4.9.
@kishankavala Can you please rebase this fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
Thanks @rhtyd for merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
Code LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794#discussion_r91453705
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4910to41000.sql ---
@@ -45,4 +45,48 @@ CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`vlan_details` (
`display` tinyint(1) NOT
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794#discussion_r91460891
--- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-4910to41000.sql ---
@@ -45,4 +45,48 @@ CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`vlan_details` (
`display` tinyint(1) NOT
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
@rhtyd I see one travis script failed due to timeout. Remaining are all
successful.
```
/home/travis/build.sh: line 151: 10405 Terminated
travis_jigger
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
@karuturi Can you please resolve the conflicts and rebase this branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
@rhtyd Yes, rebased with latest 4.9, and did a force push to kick Travis
checks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
Changed base branch to 4.9 from master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of various SUSE Linux guesâ¦
â¦t os versions on VMware 6.0
Issue: Currently many versions of SUSE Linux does not have any
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/828
LGTM. Verified manually in my VMware setup.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1793
Thanks @rhtyd
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1793
@rhtyd Yes, that's correct. The guest_os_name `windows7Server64Guest` is
supported since vSphere 4.0 onwards.
I've verified this in 5.0 as well as 6.0 setup.
-
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1793
Thanks @rhtyd
Rebased the commit over 4.9, and updated base branch to 4.9.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1793
CLOUDSTACK-9624 Incorrect hypervisor mapping of guest os Windows 2008
Server R2 (64-bit) for VMware
**JIRA ticket**
CLOUDSTACK-9624 Incorrect hypervisor mapping of guest os
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664
Hi @rhtyd, Working on this PR this week, should be able to update and push
soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1681
Code LGTM, ð +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1681
@murali-reddy Makes sense to get fresh listing of virtual NICs in next
iteration as the first iteration might have missed the hot-plugged virtual NIC
(for VPC tier being configured
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664
@jburwell Yes, currently working on breaking the methods into multiple
smaller units, and adding unit tests. Along with these adding the marvin tests
from the other PR so that PR
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664#discussion_r77140277
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/template/SeedTemplateFromVmSnapshotCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+/*
+Â
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664#discussion_r77140308
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/volume/CreateVolumeFromVmSnapshotCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// Licensed
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664
@jburwell I will check with @nitt10prashant on this. Will try to add the
tests in PR #1417 to this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664
Target this PR to ACS master branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1417
Hi @nitt10prashant / @swill
Raised PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664 for parent ticket
CLOUDSTACK-8676
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664
CLOUDSTACK-8676 Deploy user instance from vm snapshot for VMware hypervisor
Currently, ACS provides the ability to deploy a VM from a template or ISO.
However, ACS does
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
LGTM ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
@nvazquez Thanks.
I will try this in my setup and share the results.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Priyank,
What is your user name in ACS jira?
Regards,
Sateesh
On 08/07/16, 2:37 PM, "Priyank Parihar" wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to assign issues (e.g. - CLOUDSTACK-9104) to me. Please give me
permission.
--
Thanks & Regards
Priyank Parihar
DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain pri
For strong swan support, there exists a PR -
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
Regards,
Sateesh
On 07/07/16, 4:15 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote:
Awesome. thanks
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@s
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605#discussion_r69677623
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -2015,19 +2016,20 @@ protected
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605#discussion_r69677503
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -2015,19 +2016,20 @@ protected
Congrats, Will!
Wish you the best.
Regards,
Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Chief Product Engineer, CloudPlatform Development, Accelerite.
Off: +91 80 6772 1329 | EMail: sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent:
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532#issuecomment-217814911
Probably intention is to,
```java
T result = null
if (_cache != null) {
final Element element = _cache.get(id
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532#issuecomment-217814496
@DaanHoogland I agree that's the best practice though there is a glitch
here. Following code returns null if _cache is not null but el
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
