On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:39 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> I'm more concerned that the page is indistinguishable from a fork, and
>> gives no indication of official status. That may be OK for a work in
>> progres
Mar 19, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > The initial action (creating the fork) was not clearly done by the PMC
> > as a whole, that is now being rectified by a retroactive vote being
> > taken. Even that I wouldn't suggest be done any differently: many
> >
s coming up this
week), feel free to reach out to me directly. And I'm confident that
each and every one of the current Directors would make exactly this
same offer.
> Ian
- Sam Ruby
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Daan Hoo
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
>
>
>> Despite this clear failure of the board, I would suggest that the
>> CloudStack team alert the board before taking such an action again.
>>
>> I don't see any action taken by the cloudstack team tha
ear failure of the board, I would suggest that the
CloudStack team alert the board before taking such an action again.
- Sam Ruby
g the ASF, and the ASF
expanding support for repositories hosted on GitHub. I'd like to
pursue the latter, and if there are any obstacles (technical or
otherwise) would like help flatten those issues.
- Sam Ruby
> I will review what is being done with Whimsy to get a better idea how that
&
of control for a single GitHub organization is an
issue, then having multiple GitHub organizations needs to be explored as
an option.
How can I help? I'd like to bring this proposal back to the board for
wider review so that nothing important is missed. If there are issues
that come up, I will help flatten them.
- Sam Ruby
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> I think we are on the same page. I think we just need to start ironing out
> the actual logistical and technical details for how to move forward.
+1
- Sam Ruby
help? I'd like to bring this proposal back to the board for wider
>> review so that nothing important is missed. If there are issues that come
>> up, I will help flatten them.
>
> Thanks for being open and offering to help.
> Indeed let’s figure this out.
Thanks!
- Sam Ruby
