Re: Juniper SRX Support in 4.13

2019-06-26 Thread Richard Lawley
people some warning when we can... > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Lawley > Sent: 26 June 2019 14:07 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Juniper SRX Support in 4.13

2019-06-26 Thread Richard Lawley
Hi, In the current release, we list CloudStack as supporting Juniper SRX (Model srx100b) versions 10.3 to 10.4 R7.5. As I've mentioned in a previous email, this is very old (EOL 2014). The main thing that causes a problem here is that somewhere between JunOS 10 and 15, Port Forwarding changed fr

Redundant VR Guest IPs

2019-06-17 Thread Richard Lawley
Hi, When using RVRs, the guest VMs still see the VR IP instead of the VIP for a number of things: * DHCP Server * Static NAT source IP for hairpin NAT Just wondering what the reason is for this, as it causes a number of issues: * Password reset doesn't work if active VR has changed since VM boot

Re: Is anyone using SRX Integration?

2019-06-07 Thread Richard Lawley
> The last version we used is JunOS 10.x only. Do you mean that you're not using them anymore? > You can check the xml config files at the code path > scripts/network/juniper/, in JunOS 15 to see configuration differences. Unfortunately it's not as simple as that - the scripts file can be edi

Re: Is anyone using SRX Integration?

2019-06-07 Thread Richard Lawley
Jayapal > > > On 07-Jun-2019, at 12:45 PM, Richard Lawley > mailto:rich...@richardlawley.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > We've recently added a couple of Juniper SRXs, but are finding that > the integration with CloudStack is very broken. So far there have > been a

Is anyone using SRX Integration?

2019-06-07 Thread Richard Lawley
Hi, We've recently added a couple of Juniper SRXs, but are finding that the integration with CloudStack is very broken. So far there have been a number of things which just don't work: * Adding Static NAT Rules * Adding Port Forwarding Rules * Removing Port Forwarding Rules I've found and fixed

Running Self-Compiled Packages on Production

2019-06-05 Thread Richard Lawley
Hi, I'm looking to test some changes to a plugin on a production CS deployment - my Java knowledge is a bit lacking in this area, so I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction. My production servers are running from CentOS packaging - if I compile a plugin on a development machine, is

Re: Do not see KVM Hosts after 4.9.3 -> 4.11.2

2019-05-31 Thread Richard Lawley
I don't believe the issue was related to views as such. When I was trying to diagnose it earlier in the week I ran the query the view runs manually, and got the same result. I then started removing joined tables (even though they were all left joins so should not matter), and data appeared once I

Re: Do not see KVM Hosts after 4.9.3 -> 4.11.2

2019-05-30 Thread Richard Lawley
Update your database server. We had the same thing this week - updating the mariadb server fixed it. The problem was the hosts_view which returned no data, presumably due to a bug. I've also seen someone else mention this using mysql server instead of mariadb. On Thu, 30 May 2019, 23:04 Sean Lair,