Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva

Pearl! Well deserved, congrats! On 24.03.25 16:55, Daan Hoogland wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack Is delighted to announce that Pearl Dsilva has joined the PMC! Pearl has been active in the project for +- 5 years, and did so in different capacities. She's work

Re: [Announce] new committer Swen Brüseke

Yay, congratulations Swen! This was long overdue! On 18.03.25 09:57, Daan Hoogland wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited Swen Brüseke (sbrueseke) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Swen is the CEO of proio, a c

Re: [PROPOSE][DISCUSS] CloudStack Installer

hi everyone I don't have a strong opinion, VOTE 0 Nevertheless, a few comments: 1. pipe bash installers from a third party somewhere on the internet was popular but not really a good practice. Should be "support" this kind of insecure practice? 2. For testing, it would be fine. But the scop

Re: CloudStack 5?

.oO(...oh boy, what have I started...) Although I'd like to see more ‘major releases’ where we show that ‘things’ can break, our release strategy and feature integration has worked pretty well. It looks silly to discuss weather 4.21 or 5.0. I just want to point out that at some point between

Re: CloudStack 5?

Hi João This goes a bit further than my cosmetic "let us change the major version to 5" but I have to agree that our "change set per release" is not reflected in the "version number scheme". Maybe I'm the wrong person to ask about changing the release process, or how we implement features be

CloudStack 5?

Dear CloudStack developers More than 10 years have passed since the release of 4.0.0, and for a long time we kept 4 as the major version. The minor version is now at 20, but the word ‘minor’ is not correct: each new ‘minor’ version has many new features and a lot of work from you has gone into

Re: Congratulations to Alexandre Mattioli for Joining the CloudStack PMC

Alex! Congrats! René

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.20.0.0

Well done. I can't wait to try it out as soon as possible. Regards René

Ansible 2.8: CloudStack related changes

(#54098) Add a new CloudStack module - cs_traffic_type (#54451) Enable adding VLAN IP ranges for Physical Networks (#54576) Proper handling of lower case name for InternalLbVm Service Provider (#55087) Rene Moser (13): cs_loadbalancer_rule_member: fix error handling (#4

Re: Any plan for 4.11 LTS extension ?

On 3/14/19 10:48 AM, Giles Sirett wrote: > Hi Haijiao > > I would *expect* 4.13.0 (LTS) to be released in Q2, which will supersede > the 4.11 branch as the current LTS branch btw... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS: "LTS releases starting with the first major rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.12.0.0 [RC2]

Hi Seeing a failing ansible integration test for 4.12.0.0 RC2, which passes in 4.11.2: API says: Network with UUID:19f750cf-de98-43ab-b565-1935a7c23f6e is in allocated and needs to be implemented first before acquiring an IP address https://gist.github.com/resmo/0c3a89055962456f68b27567bb5794f6

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

We used "Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64-bit)" and in the release notes I see a "OS Type: Other Linux 64-bit (or Debian 8.0 or 9.0 64-bit)" for vmware [1]. However, let me change this to "Other Linux 64-bit" and verify if it makes any difference here. René [1] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.11.1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Hi On 11/19/18 4:43 PM, Zehnder, Samuel wrote: > 1) Memory Consumption on vSphere > > vRouter are starting to swap with low memory available, this also starts > happening after increasing memory size to 512m. Interestingly, there's > no process nor cache using the memory as far as "top", "ps", o

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

+0 Won't have a chance to test it, but RC4 look already not too bad to me. Thanks for all the works! On 11/13/18 2:59 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for > testing and a vote: > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https:/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/30/2018 05:10 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181030T1040 > > Commit: 840ad40017612e169665fa799a6d31a23ecad347 +1 (binding): Good

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC3

On 10/18/2018 12:54 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > The vote will be open until the middle of next week, 26th September 2018. s/September/October/ right?

Re: Ansible 2.7: CloudStack related changes and future

...and thanks for all the fish... and for the kind words, and a special thank to Exoscale for their continuous support. It has been a great time, with many opportunities I was able to master. I have followed the vision to make CloudStack a thing in Ansible. However, the reason I started the devel

Re: Ansible 2.7: CloudStack related changes and future

Sorry, I forgot to mention, that David Passante is already part of the ansible cloudstack team, but at least one other person would be helpful. Thanks again René

Ansible 2.7: CloudStack related changes and future

sante (1): cloudstack: new module cs_disk_offering (#41795) Rene Moser (4): cs_firewall: fix idempotence and tests for cloudstack v4.11 (#42458) cs_vpc: fix disabled or wrong vpc offering taken (#42465) cs_pod: workaround for 4.11 API break (#43944) cs_template: impl

Re: [cloudstack] branch master updated (1fa4f10 -> fcc87d9)

On 10/08/2018 09:24 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 for protecting master and recent 4.{11,10,9...} branches from force pushes. One of those Mondays... ;) +1

Re: [4.11.1] VR memory leak?

On 10/01/2018 01:41 PM, Simon Weller wrote: > Any obvious processes using memory? No, unfortunately not. Everything looks calm but real memory usage increases slowly. We are still trying to find the source issue. René

[4.11.1] VR memory leak?

Hi We observe a specious pattern in memory usage (see graph free memory https://photos.app.goo.gl/sffEmBEoZ1gbRd18A) we restarted the VR last Friday, today on Monday, we have less then 20% memory of 1 GB. The memory is used memory not cached (also see https://photos.app.goo.gl/b9eAd3xoETvDVKzH9)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC2

Hi On 09/28/2018 05:21 PM, Boris Stoyanov wrote: > Hi guys, > > I’ve did some upgrade testing of RC2. I did upgraded database successfully > from 4.5.2.2, 4.9.3 and 4.11.1, but unfortunately I’ve run into a > connectivity issue between vmware 4.5u3 environments. > > Looks like TLS1.2 is not s

Re: VRs swapping with 256 MB RAM

ly less. Thats why we offer > extra VR with 2 cores and 1GB RAM as another option so that customers can > use it instead of the default 256MB and 1 core. > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rene Moser wrote: > >> Hi >> >> While running test for a 4.11.1 (VMware

VRs swapping with 256 MB RAM

Hi While running test for a 4.11.1 (VMware) upgrade in our lab, we run into low memory / swapping of VRs having 256 MB RAM. After 2-3 days it became critical because the management server connections to VRs took very long, minutes, this resulted in many more problems all over. Make sure your VRs

Re: API Break in pods API

Thanks Nicolas for the pointer. Breaking the API is bad, even worse that the API docs still suggest to update start/end ips by the API updatePod AND no errors returned (silent fail). We left users behind here. On 08/17/2018 01:31 AM, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: > Hi Rene, > > > As you mentioned it

API Break in pods API

Hi In https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.11/apis/updatePod.html the updatePod API shows that startip and endip could be updated. However, since 4.11, I can't anymore. Can anyone confirm? Did I miss a thing? This (possible) API break in 4.11 for pods seems to be introduced by https://git

Re: Github Issues

Hi On 07/17/2018 02:01 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > Hi Paul, > > My 2 cents on the topic. > > people are commenting on issues when it should by the PR and vice-versa >> > > I think this is simply due to the fact that with one login you can do both, > versus before you had to have a JIRA lo

Re: [Proposal] new API for recover routers

Hi Dag On 07/11/2018 12:08 PM, Dag Sonstebo wrote: > Hi Rene, > > So if you have upgraded 4.5 to 4.11 (or any version upgrade where new system > VM templates are in play) then your 4.5 VRs are by definition destroyed and > you are running with 4.11 VRs. As a result there is nothing to recover –

[Proposal] new API for recover routers

Hi While tested v4.11.1 in the lab and upgraded the routers, we came across the need of "downgrade" the routers after rolled back to ACS to v4.5 (testing upgrade process). So my proposal is to have a new api for recover the routers to the system-vm template, AFAICS similar to https://cloudstack.a

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

On 06/20/2018 01:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 06/20/2018 12:31 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: >> If this initiative goes through, perhaps that’s a good time to bump >> CloudStack’s release number to 5.0.0? >> > > That's what I said in my e-mail :-) But yes, I agree with you, this >

Re: 4.11.1 install feedback

Hi again Regarding router: the router looks more stable (rohit lab version). However, we still need to manually reboot it after first provisioning, otherwise the management server does not get access by ssh. Having a lot of fw rules and many VMs in an advanced network, still takes a "hell of a ti

Re: 4.11.1 install feedback

On 05/22/2018 06:08 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Had you 'upgraded' to dynamic roles in your 4.9 environment Rene? right, it was for 4.9. Yes, did that. the "session expired" issue seems only related to UI. api keys still work.

Re: 4.11.1 install feedback

d session, missing signature, or missing apiKey -- ignoring request. Signature: null, apiKey: null On 05/22/2018 05:39 PM, Rene Moser wrote: > Hi > > I ran the update from 4.9.3 to 4.11.1 (rohit lab) and got into the issue > where I can still not login with admin after upgrade. I im

4.11.1 install feedback

Hi I ran the update from 4.9.3 to 4.11.1 (rohit lab) and got into the issue where I can still not login with admin after upgrade. I immediately get a "session expired" in the UI. I remember an issue related to roles but can not find the "workaround" and thought it were fixed for 4.11.1. Any help

Re: Default API response type: XML -> JSON

I am +1 but with a versioned API (v2) because this would break most likely many API implementations. René On 04/23/2018 03:34 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I thought it would be good to move from XML to JSON by default in the > response of the API if no response type is sent

[DISCUSS] VR upgrading workflow thoughts

Hi One of the biggest challenges in cloudstack is upgrading VRs in an advanced networking setup. Even though with the latest efforts made by shapeblue and Rohit (nice work) the replacement of a VR does not disconnect the services behind the router anymore, there is still room for improvement. Cu

Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues

+1

Re: Cloudstack metrics, usage collection and reporting?

Only have https://github.com/resmo/awesome-cloudstack#montitoring-and-graphs

Re: [4.11] Management to VR connection issues

On 02/26/2018 12:41 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > - If waiting for ssh and apache2 as part of post-init solves the issue, this > would require a new systemvmtemplate as the systemd scripts cannot be changed > or make effect during first boot. The waiting for ssh was not the issue, it was a result.

Re: [4.11] Management to VR connection issues

Hi Paul On 02/26/2018 11:35 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Rene, > Have you checked the OS getting applied on vCenter? It's "Other 3.x or later Linux (64-bit)" also see https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipPNnFnP8xMIHgYCQ0rZtDsyeVGoJIyHjPqWP8BP-hiNRnd0CxHuc8xn5GetIrpocQ/photo/AF1QipPIeKUnVU4hQ8_AuNT8ga

Re: [4.11] Management to VR connection issues

Hi again We found the main problem. == cloud-postinit hang When having many iptables rules resulting in cloud-postinit to hang for 10min unless it was killed by systemd. As a result the ssh daemon was not started for 10 min because it is configured to be started after cloud-postinit. It seems t

Re: [4.11] Management to VR connection issues

On 02/20/2018 08:04 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Rene, > > > Thanks for sharing - I've not seen this in test/production environment yet. > Does it help to destroy the VR and check if the issue persists? Also, is this > behaviour system-wide for every VR, or VRs of specific networks or topologie

[4.11] Management to VR connection issues

Hi We upgraded from 4.9 to 4.11. VMware 6.5.0. (Testing environment). VR upgrade went through. But we noticed that the communication between the management server and the VR are not working properly. We do not yet fully understand the issue, one thing we noted is that the networks configs seems

Re: [DISCUSS] DB upgrade issue workaround for 4.10.0.0 users upgrading to 4.11.0.0

On 02/14/2018 06:21 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > the -x would only add it to the comment making it harder to find. As for > multiple stable branches; merging forward always folows all branches > forward so a fix on 4.9 would be merged forward to 4.10 and then 4.10 would > be merged forward again to 4

Re: [DISCUSS] DB upgrade issue workaround for 4.10.0.0 users upgrading to 4.11.0.0

Hi Daan On 02/14/2018 05:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Rene, > > The issue is certainly not due the git workflow but to upgrade schemes we > have. > > The result of this workflow for us is that it is easier to find to which > branches a particular commit is added as by merging forward the commit

Re: [DISCUSS] DB upgrade issue workaround for 4.10.0.0 users upgrading to 4.11.0.0

Hi all Thanks for taking care of this issue. However, I wonder how we can prevent such issues in the future and wondering if this "incident" has its orginos by our current git workflow. I find the workflow "commit to stable branch --> merge back to master" is inconvenient. Because at one point,

Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

On 02/06/2018 02:47 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi Daan, > > In my opinion the biggest issue is the fact that there are a lot of different > code paths: VPC versus non-VPC, VPC versus redundant-VPC, etc. That's why you > cannot simply switch from a single VPC to a redundant VPC for example. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

On 01/17/2018 03:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > People, People, > > a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes > about the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote > period until at least Monday. +1 I wonder where this 72 hours windows com

Re: [DISCUSS] new way of github working

On 01/15/2018 09:06 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > Daan, > > Now that master is open for merges again, can we get a feedback here? It > might be interesting to find a consensus and a standardize way of working > for everybody before we start merging things in master again … +1 to allow merge c

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

On 01/08/2018 01:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Does this look agreeable? Thanks. +1

Re: [DISCUSS] new way of github working

Hi On 01/08/2018 10:45 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Devs, > > I see a lot of merge master to branch commits appearing on PRs. This is > against prior (non-hard) agreements on how we work. It is getting to be the > daily practice so; > How do we feel about > 1. not using merge commits anymore? > 2.

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

On 01/08/2018 09:47 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Rohit, Ivan, > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still go > in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at Ivan's > PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively > working on i

Re: Any pythonista willing to help backport some cloud-init changes?

On 12/28/2017 05:57 PM, Nux! wrote: > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > tests/unittests/test_datasource/test_cloudstack.py.rej No python magic needed here, only git magic :) So only the tests part did not apply, I would just "exclude" those... git am --exclude=tests/unittests/t

Re: Any pythonista willing to help backport some cloud-init changes?

Jo Nux On 12/28/2017 10:04 AM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > I've been made aware by a user that there is an issue (regression) with the > latest cloud-init in CentOS, in that the Cloudstack data source does not > parse dhcp lease files with "-" in them. > There's a fix, but it does not apply cleanly.

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your integration

Hi On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > We've come across a pull request which changes the event description to > use/export UUIDs instead of the numeric internal ID of a resource. I'm not > sure if this could potentially break any external integration such as > billing, cr

Re: [DISCUSS] Redundant Virtual Routers on VMware?

Hi On 12/08/2017 11:56 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Is anyone using redundant virtual routers with VMware, either in VPCs or > isolated networks (with recent or older versions of ACS)? No, not currently. We once had rVR but this is quite a while ago. We migrated away but it was related to issues fin

Re: Call for participation: Issue triaging and PR review/testing

Hi all On 12/13/2017 05:04 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hello, devs, users, Rohit. Have a good day. > > Rohit, you intend to freeze 4.11 on 8 january and, frankly speaking, I see > risks here. A major risk is that 4.10 is too buggy and it seems nobody uses > it actually right now in production b

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.11

Perfect. Thanks Rohit, Daan and Paul! On 11/29/2017 11:14 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi All, > > I’d like to put myself forward as release manager for 4.11. The 4.11 > releases will be the next major version LTS release since 4.9 and will be > supported for 20 months per the LTS manifesto [2] until

Re: CloudStack LTS EOL date?

Hi Paul On 11/27/2017 06:27 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi Rene, > > note: I'm only stating what the original intent was when LTS was originally > proposed. I'm not trying to dictate what we must do now or in the future. > > ... The LTS scheme was designed when there was a release coming out every

Re: CloudStack LTS EOL date?

Hi Paul On 11/22/2017 05:39 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > HI All, > > The current LTS cycle is based on having an LTS release twice a year (at the > time of design, ACS releases were coming out monthly). > > So, twice a year (nominally, January and July) we take the then current > version of CloudS

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate

Hi Rohit First, thank you very much for the effort! On 11/21/2017 01:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Please advise if you can collaborate with me on this, especially around > testing. Thanks! I have some 2 "nice to have"s, AFAICS these haven't been addressed yet: - SNMP readonly listen on "linklo

CloudStack LTS EOL date?

Hi all The current LTS release is 4.9 which is EOL in June 2018 according to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS AFAIK there are no works planed for a new LTS. The release pace has slown down (the high pace and leaving users behind fixes was the reason for the LTS). I am s

Re: POLL: ACL default egress policy rule in VPC

Looks like the winner is 3 for devel. Thanks for the participation. Regards René On 11/13/2017 06:47 PM, Rene Moser wrote: > Hi Devs > > The last days I fought with the ACL egress rule behaviour and I would > like to make a poll in which direction the fix should go. > > Shor

Re: POLL: ACL default egress policy rule in VPC

Hi On 11/16/2017 11:14 AM, Nux! wrote: > 4. I think Jayapal's reply deserves more attention. > > See below. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Jayapal Uradi" >> To: "dev" >> Sent: Tuesday, 14 November,

Re: New committer: Gabriel Beims Bräscher

Welcome Gabriel and congrat! On 11/15/2017 06:22 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > Thank you guys! > > 2017-11-15 12:11 GMT-02:00 Tutkowski, Mike : > >> Congratulations, Gabriel! >> >> On Nov 15, 2017, at 3:36 AM, Sigert GOEMINNE > nuagenetworks.net> w

Re: POLL: ACL default egress policy rule in VPC

Note the typo in the user mailing list email address, don't use reply all... sry

POLL: ACL default egress policy rule in VPC

Hi Devs The last days I fought with the ACL egress rule behaviour and I would like to make a poll in which direction the fix should go. Short Version: We need to define a better default behaviour for acl default egress rule. I see 3 different options: 1. always add a default deny all egress rul

Re: New committers: Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier

Congrats Nathan and Marc-Aurèle! René On 09/22/2017 06:31 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited > Nathan Johnson and Marc-Aurèle Brothier to become committers and we are > pleased to announce that they have accepted. > > They hav

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (RC1)

Thanks Rohit for the efforts! On 09/07/2017 04:22 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > The vote for CloudStack 4.9.3.0 [1] *passes* with > 3 PMC + 3 non-PMC votes. > > +1 (PMC / binding) > 3 persons (Milamber, Daan, Rohit) > > +1 (non binding) > 3 person (Glenn, Boris, René) > > 0 > none > > -1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.3.0 RC1

On 09/04/2017 05:46 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Thank you all for voting, we've enough binding votes to pass the RC, however, > some PMC members have expressed interest in testing/voting so I'll extend the > voting window by another 72 hours and we'll conclude the voting after EOD > Wed, 6th August

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.3.0 RC1

+1 Run Ansible CloudStack simulator test suite with tests for account affinitygroup cluster configuration domain firewall host instance instancegroup nic iso LB network ACL network ACL rules pod portforward project region resourcelimit role router securi

Re: [discuss] log4j2

Hi I would consider https://logback.qos.ch/ as a possible replacement as well. Regards René On 08/04/2017 08:56 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi All, > > My meanderings through various corners of CloudStack caused me to be look at > our logging. > > Log4j v1 has been end of life since May 2015 [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Metadata server IP improvement

On 07/26/2017 09:00 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > This has been discussed before and right now there is a PR for using Config > Drive: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2116 > > The problem with 169.254.169.254 is: > > - It doesn't work with IPv6 > - It doesn't work with Basic Networki

[DISCUSS] Metadata server IP improvement

Hi Speaking about VR improvements: I would like to change the way we need to find the metadata API. Currently we do something like "cat /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-eth0.leases | grep dhcp-server-identifier | tail -1" to find the IP of the service. However, parsing a dhcp lease file is not the bes

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate

Hi Rohit On 07/23/2017 06:08 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > Just want to kick an initial discussion around migration to Debian9 based > systemvmtemplate, and get your feedback on the same. > > Here's a work-in-progress PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2198 Have you consider

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate

Hi On 07/23/2017 06:21 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > > I think that we should look at lighter Distros like Arch Linux in order to > get the boot times of the system VMs down. > That in conjunction with improving the configuration will gives as a much > leaner, meaner System VM. I tend to -1 for Arch

Re: next major release

Hi Rajani, Wei On 07/10/2017 08:40 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > It depends on how many new futures or improvements will be merged. > > Here are some features we are interested (and in progress) > - CloudStack Container Service (by shapeblue) > - NoVNC console (GSoC project) > - Config Drive (by wido) >

Re: JIRA - PLEASE READ

Hi Paul On 06/29/2017 11:06 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi, Mr Grumpy here! > > I was looking the commits and I'm seeing commits going in with no Jira Issue > assigned. > My understanding is that there must be a Jira ticket for EVERY > fix/enhancement/feature, so that we have a way to search and

[DISCUSS] API versioning

Hi I recently developed ansible modules for the ACL API and ... found this has a really inconsistent API naming. E.g. createNetworkACL <<-- this creates an ACL rule createNetworkACLList <<-- this create the ACL updateNetworkACLItem <<-- this updates an ACL rule updateNetworkACLList <<-- this upd

Re: [apache/cloudstack] Vyos router plugin (#2105)

Hi Matthew On 06/03/2017 01:50 PM, Matthew Smart wrote: > This didn't go through the first time for some reason... > > Hey guys, > > I know this is going to take some time to merge. In the meantime, I am > preparing my design for the next iteration of the plugin which will > tentatively add DNS,

Re: Miami CCC '17 Roundtable/Hackathon Summary

Hi On 05/23/2017 02:16 PM, Simon Weller wrote: > We floated some ideas related to short term VR fixes in order to make it more > modular, as well as API driven, rather than the currently SSH JSON injections. Speaking about endless possibilities... ;) I support the initiative (+1) to make the r

Re: Awesome CloudStack

Hi Will On 05/10/2017 07:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Awesome!!! Great initiative Rene. You going to be at ApacheCon in Miami? Sad to say but no, I can not make it. > Maybe we can give this list a bit of airtime to give it some more > visibility. :) That would be awesome! ;)

Re: Awesome CloudStack

On 05/10/2017 08:50 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > I work in the development of the Autonomiccs plugin; a plugin that > autonomously manages environments orchestrated by Apache CloudStack (more > details at [1]). Do you believe that it would be interesting adding plugins > such as Autonomicc

Re: Awesome CloudStack

Hi Gabriel On 05/10/2017 08:50 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > Hi Rene, > > That is a great idea! > > Is the content related to any project that is linked somehow with Apache > CloudStack? As simple as anything "awesome" or let's say useful that is related to the CloudStack ecosystem. What

Awesome CloudStack

Hi I started "A curated list of bookmarks, packages, tutorials, videos and other cool resources from the CloudStack ecosystem" on https://github.com/resmo/awesome-cloudstack Feel free to extend it by sending PRs ;) René

Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features

I am +1 Even though git is distributed, the github workflow (PRs) has some scale limitations. Having a lots of small PRs can lead into a maintenance hell for keeping them mergeable. One way around it is to either have a "next"-branch or branch of master. Either way, branching is required. Since w

Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0

Thanks Remi for the hint and Daan for pick it up! That is why I like open source software development and this project ;) On 05/03/2017 02:49 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Happy to pick this up, Remi. I'm travelling now but will look at both on > Friday.

Re: Github messages on dev list

Hi Wido There have been messages from github in the past (you probably had a filter?). I already wrote I don't like it and suggested to use comm...@cloudstack.apache.org for automated and bot messages. But a few devs insisted they like to keep them here that filtering would be an option (for all

Re: IMPORTANT: Moving to Gitbox/Github

Thanks Wido, worked like a charm. ;)

Re: represent the object in the logs

Hi Rafael On 04/12/2017 08:27 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > Well, I think the missing point to understand why we have these different > situations is the understanding of the developer’s mind. It is so diverse > and unique from people to people, and because we do not have a policy on > that, eac

represent the object in the logs

Hi In logs we see all kind variations how an object is printed to the users. E.g. for VMs we have seen, the DB ID, UUID, internal name, name etc. in different debug log messages. And this makes debugging harder than it should. I wondered, why don't we just use the "toString()" in VO classes. E.g

CloudStack related changes in Ansible 2.3

Hi CloudStack users Ansible 2.3 is about to be released, I would like to summarize the CloudStack related features and changes in this release. New modules --- - cs_host - cs_nic - cs_region - cs_role - cs_vpc Examples and usage for these modules can be found in the docs, http://docs.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack should join the gitbox experiment.

On 04/10/2017 06:22 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host > mirrors of Apache project on github with more write access then just > to the mirror-bot. For those projects committers can merge on github > and put labels on PRs. > > I move to have

Re: MySQL 5.7 and SQL Mode

Hi Wido On 04/10/2017 05:00 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > While testing with Ubuntu 16.04 and CloudStack 4.10 (from master) I've ran > into this error on the management server: > > com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Expression #1 of > SELECT list is not in GRO

Re: Welcoming Wido as the new ACS VP

Thanks Will for all the efforts! Congrats Wido and I have no doubts you keep up the good work ;) -Rene

Re: Return VPC ID of VM

call. > > Regards, Remi > > > On 11/03/2017, 09:57, "Rene Moser" wrote: > > Hi Remi > > Perfect! Thanks for the clarification. I still wonder how to do it but > that is another story :) > > René > > On 03/11/

Re: Return VPC ID of VM

screenshots) so please have a look at > Github. > > Regards, Remi > > On 10/03/2017, 17:52, "Rene Moser" wrote: > > Hi > > I created https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1999 to return the > vpcid the VM belongs to in listVirtualM

Return VPC ID of VM

Hi I created https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1999 to return the vpcid the VM belongs to in listVirtualMachines- I need this for the cloudstack ansible modules to fully determine VMs uniquely as listVirtualMachines returns all VMs (non-vpc and vpc) and they can be named identically. (I

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

Hi While not be directly related to the clodustack java source code, any RPM created using the specs from the repo e.g. from packages/centos7 and proceeding an upgrade, will hit CLOUDSTACK-9765, PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923 fixes the issue. Regards René On 03/01/2017 02:12

  1   2   >