Hey Nicolas,
The .install file should be used by dpkg when the deb packages are built
with dpkg-buildpackage, i don't know about .postinstall extension, usually
you have to specify post-install scripts somewhere.. a grep -r on the code
base should expose if that postinstall file is called from deb
Its probably the issue i fixed in this PR ->
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/329
It was only merged on 4.4
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 14-07-15 14:11, lavaf...@163.com wrote:
> >
> > hi:
> >
> >
Well deserved indeed. Parabéns Wilder!
Sent from my iThing
On Jul 1, 2015 7:13 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased
> to announce that Wilder Rodrigues (ekho) has accepted our invitation to
> join the PMC.
>
> Please join me in cong
/github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/dhcpoffload
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> On 26-Jun-2015, at 5:57 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> Travis has been failing for several reasons, that's why i made the fixes
> that are currently on master. Make sure y
Hi Daan, from the output it's exactly the same issue that is causing some
of the test suites to not run on some of the travis runs, and that
prevented me to fix the fact that tests are considered success when they
throw exceptions as we discussed. If you figure it out in the mean while
let me know
That's what the _Extended suffix i added means :)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Rafael Fonseca
> wrote:
> > Or if we really want the extra overhead:
> >
> > ( Green_Travis && 2LGTM) || ( Red_Trav
and
wrote:
> I said that red travis is requiring extra explanation by the LGTMers
> to justify overrinding travis as an alternative to green travis. Not
> that red travis is fine.
>
> your logic is too boolean, not fuzzy enough
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Raf
gt;> I still don't think travis is reliable enough to give a definite 'no'.
> >> Two LGTMs is fine and a good argument if travis is red on why this is
> >> not a problem for this case.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Fonseca
&
Hi Jayapal,
Travis has been failing for several reasons, that's why i made the fixes
that are currently on master. Make sure you merge that into whatever branch
you're testing if it's over a week old, that will make it a lot less prone
to failure.
These changes should also be backported to other b
t 12:51 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> So I don't have access to any of the Travis slaves - that's all
> managed by Travis-CI the company.
> I do have Admin access to the github org and by extension to all of
> the travis settings, but not employed by travis.
>
> On Thu, J
I meant expand before_install.sh, not before_script.sh :)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> Hi David,
> How much permissions do you have on the Travis Infra?
> It seems some slaves have a full /tmp and are causing some failures due to
> that... can you fix i
Hi David,
How much permissions do you have on the Travis Infra?
It seems some slaves have a full /tmp and are causing some failures due to
that... can you fix it, or should i just draft a command that will try to
safely cleanup the /tmp files before build starts ... something like rm -f
all files o
avis is red on why this is
> not a problem for this case.
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Rafael Fonseca
> wrote:
> > Couldn't make it either :'(
> >
> > I think it's a very sound idea in principle, but afraid waiting for two
> > LGTM might slow
Couldn't make it either :'(
I think it's a very sound idea in principle, but afraid waiting for two
LGTM might slow things down even further... up to the majority vote i guess
it's a good principle either way :)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
IMO, asserts should be completely removed in most classes.
It's mostly used in early development stages and ACS has been production
grade for quite some time.
The assert statement won't even run on production, because it's disabled by
default in the JVM in production runtime, and we're of course no
r later and focus on some more needed fixes not
related to packaging that everyone should agree to get into releases ASAP.
Looking forward for Pyr's input on this :)
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:28 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
>
Hi guys,
I plan on getting started on dissecting the embedded Tomcat/Jetty PR this
week, it would be nice to get it into 4.6.0, since it's quite a change in
functional packaging to do it in a minor like 4.6.1 (documentation wise and
stuff), and i guess 4.7.0 is still far down the road.
Want to hol
Hi all,
Sorry for the 100+ SPAM mails from asfbot caused by me, this was a good
weekend for the Cloudstack build environment though :)
- jenkins-slow-build is now sucessful:
Daan worked very hard on this to get it running properly, we now have
proper alerting for bad practice/bugs on new code ...
Great work Daan :D
I will help out on cleaning up some more of those 164 findbugs, i'll focus
on non-encoding stuff first :)
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> victory is imminent, We have 164 to go. most of them are the encoding
> kind which are mostly boring. The others w
just a guess, sorry
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Rafael Fonseca
>> wrote:
>> > But how did you go from that to .git permissions issue? :)
>> > Trying to understand it better to see if there's anyway i can help out
>> in
>> > fixing it
Hi ilya,
Since MIT is not an evil entity such as Oracle (regarding last ongoing
licensing discussion hehe) i guess it is compatible :)
It's listed here -> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
Cheers,
RF
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:53 AM, ilya wrote:
> General question, can we add/use compone
Thank you Daan, glad to help :)
Also, take a look at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/399 , this
one will bring the "14 new issues" down to 10. The other ones still open
are for issues not considered "new" to jenkins.
Full count was 257 (yesterday) down to 188 (this morning) :)
On Mon, J
Not all the PRs are commited yet, but it's looking a bit better now :)
Will trigger a travis re-run on the failed PRs when i get a chance..
[FINDBUGS] Plug-in Result: Failed - 14 new
warnings of priority High exceed the
threshold of 0 by 14
Build step 'Publish FindBugs analysis results' changed bu
Hi Devender,
I've experience a similar issue a few times in my test environments, so i
took a closer look at what was causing it... If you're experiencing the
same issue, here's the symptoms, cause and resolution:
Symptoms:
- SSL fails to start on tomcat;
- SSL connection fails to establish betwe
You guys can also count on me for whatever help you need to make it happen
smoothly :)
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can jump in and work with Rohit and Daan to make 4.6 happen.
>
> +1 for the QA on master. It would be best if we could then all focus on
> stabi
Do you have a firewall in between that might be closing long or idle
sessions?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Will try Simon.
>
> I expect no latency issues, since these 3 VMs are all on same
> bridge/physical host. Other 2 Galera nodes are remote, but still low
> latenc
Congrats milamber :-D
On Jun 8, 2015 12:38 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack is pleased to
> announce that Bruno Demion has accepted our invitation to join the PMC.
>
> Please join me in congratulating him.
>
> On behalf of the Apache C
Sorry about the SPAM guys, was trying to pinpoint this issue to fix it..
though it was bad timing because builds.apache.org has been unresponsive
for the last 20 minutes... either under attack or maintenance.
Will try it some other time :)
Ubuntu-1 node was one of the ovm3 problem nodes, but has b
l check this, and let you know - there is compile flag to compile
> without LRO, which I did, but... :)
>
> Thanks, as usuall :)
>
> On 4 June 2015 at 00:22, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrija,
> >
> > I guess you're running 3.23.2.1 driver?
> > If so,
Hi Andrija,
I guess you're running 3.23.2.1 driver?
If so, try going to the source dir and run:
sed -i -e '/#include /a #define IXGBE_NO_LRO'
src/kcompat.h
recompile & test
give feedback :)
Good luck,
Rafael
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I'm wondering i
What OS was that on? I can test it :)
Btw.. if there's already a cert in the DB and you delete the
cloudmanagement.keystore, a corrupted one gets exported to the filesystem
which makes the server fail to talk to the agent throwing an error on the
agent side (java.io.IOException: Connection closed
There are also a few kvm bugs which could be related, what kernel and
qemu-kvm versions are you running?
Rafael
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> What does arp show you on the VR when this occurs?
> Can you isolate this VR to a different physical host and upstream switch?
>
1, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Andrija, Rafael, I took a few minutes to look at it. It doesn't apply even
> after some simple tinkering. Hope you will once forgive me for not taking
> this in the next RC. baking it now
>
> Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 15:22 schreef Andrij
M, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Daan, Rafael,
>
> what about Rafael's https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/308 - it
> need
> to be reviewsed by security time - fine, but can we merge this, and undo
> alter, if necessary ?
>
> On 1 June 2015 at 14:26, Rafael Fonsec
This will fix the deb tests on jenkins permanently :)
The packaging always needed a manual update in deb/changelog after a change
in pom.xml version. If this step was forgotten or skipped, it would break.
Fixed for now and forever hopefully :)
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
Hey Daan,
I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb packaging issues for 4.4
Have a look here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/339
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me.
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wr
Hi Eric,
I've stumbled into the same issue, already reported it to Wilder, who is
having a look at fixing this the proper way :)
It happens because you have some native KVM libraries installed.
You can either skiptests to get the packaging built or you can change what
the test expects if you want
By the way, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/291 should also be
ported to 4.4
The build
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-deb/ has
been failing for the past eight months and this will fix it.
This should not depend on parsing the version in the changelog, a
Here's one for current versions :)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/329
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> making a new rc as I don't have time the rest of the weekend. no problem if
> I need to do another. vote thread coming up
>
> Op vr 29 mei 2015 om 16:00 schre
n peer into what's going on and
> >> > why - though I think Rafael's later response is perhaps pragmatic.
> >> >
> >> > --David
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com&
hehe
Rafael
On May 27, 2015 12:56 PM, "Stephen Turner"
wrote:
> I've got no specific view on your change, Rafael: I just think security
> matters should be discussed on the security list. I'm copying this email to
> them.
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
&g
> change a claimed security fix without taking it back to the security list.
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael Fonseca [mailto:rsafons...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 May 2015 11:16
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: refresh brow
want us to restore the old behaviour without a
> proper audit from security experts.
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Rafael Fonseca [mailto:rsafons...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 May 2015 10:39
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: refre
gt; > > > that was causing this side effect due to the way sessionids were
> > handled..
> > > >
> > > > On 5/26/15 8:15 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> > > >> Thx Rafael, as usuall :)
> > > >>
> > > >> I remember there wa
Hi Andrija,
I noticed the same is also happening on the 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT .. it's a bit
annoying.
I'll have a closer look later today if i can find the time for it :)
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> just wondering - when I refresh browser/UI I get logged out
I am getting the same in my environments, can't you put that
UnsatistfiedLinkError in a try/catch to let it not fail if the exception
isn't thrown? :)
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Wilder,
>
> In my environment, when building the kvm plugin on master branch I’m
> getti
ut this. i have no idea how to access those
> slaves. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-81
>
> Op vr 22 mei 2015 om 19:37 schreef Rafael Fonseca :
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > This Jenkins build failure in OVM3 is starting to annoy me.. can anyone
> > help/gra
Hi guys,
This Jenkins build failure in OVM3 is starting to annoy me.. can anyone
help/grant access to the apache build site/slaves, either to add some
config to the Jenkins job to produce useful output on failures or to track
the issue on the failing slaves themselves?
This is failing only on spe
>
>
> Thanks for taking the time!
>
> Cheers
>
> On 21 May 2015 at 18:08, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrija,
> >
> > This was a possible workaround for the first problem in that jira issue,
> to
> > clarify:
> >
> > Are you
use of that - sorry if I was not clear on this...
>
> But this Tomcat version replacement - is also related to the first issue ?
>
>
> Thanks for taking the time!
>
> Cheers
>
> On 21 May 2015 at 18:08, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrija,
> >
> >
ay 21, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Thx Rafael, added, restated, but still see issue :(
>
> On 21 May 2015 at 17:32, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Hi again Andrija,
> >
> > I saw on that issue that upgrading to tomcat 6.0.43 doesn't seem to fix
>
- this is officialy fixed by replacing Tomcat
> version AFAIK, as you will see from comments.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Andrija
>
> On 21 May 2015 at 16:01, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrija,
> >
> > No.. this sed is unrelated to any breadcrumb issue, can you ell
ael,
>
> this SED is also related to the breadcrumb issue we are seeing in UI ?
>
> Thx for inputs :)
>
> Cheers
>
> On 21 May 2015 at 15:38, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
> > Btw.. if you're worried about latency on the UI, run this and you will
> have
> > inst
Btw.. if you're worried about latency on the UI, run this and you will have
instant page reloads :)
sed -i -e 's/?t=<%=now%>//'
/usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/index.jsp
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> Hi Andrija,
>
>
Hi Andrija,
Those sort of problems will no longer affect anyone when my PR gets merged:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238
In the meanwhile, if you want to run tomcat 6.0.43 in any distro, just do
the following:
- Download
http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.43/bin/apac
Hi :)
The jdk 7 is always installed because of the requires in the spec file.
BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel
BuildRequires: ws-commons-util
The ws-commons-util is downloaded through maven and is not needed as a OS
package, in rhel 7 this depends on java 7, so it's always installed if
li
python scripts touch all sorts of
> things and require a post-agent reconfigure. If we make the ports
> configurable, the script should probably just not bother touching the
> firewall and let an admin do it, or prompt during cloud-setup-management.
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:32
I would agree to having that for safety in IE if it wasn't hurting the
other browsers so much.
I'd do some testing to find out exactly if there is an issue and if
reproducible, find a different workaround.. this just isn't worth the time
waiting for reply from everyone else...
Carlos suggested a ha
should I force dynamic compression or not, does not mean that creating a
duplicate file with .gz extension will make it serve compressed :)
All that this was doing was duplicating content (both files compressed and
uncompressed were being shipped) and installed, but only the uncompressed
version wa
May 12, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
>
> https://www.adminsub.net/tcp-udp-port-finder/9090
>
> vs
>
> https://www.adminsub.net/tcp-udp-port-finder/9190
>
> The latter would most likely hurt the less to a broad user base :)
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:2
https://www.adminsub.net/tcp-udp-port-finder/9090
vs
https://www.adminsub.net/tcp-udp-port-finder/9190
The latter would most likely hurt the less to a broad user base :)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> There are some handy tools to get the sense of having lik
s I lean toward not inconveniencing our existing
> user base by changing ports, to avoid a minor and fairly expected
> inconvenience that a new setup might experience port conflicts with
> unrelated services on common app ports.
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Rafael Fonseca
>
s httpd/nginx more secure than tomcat?
>
> Best regards,
> Laszlo
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rafael Fonseca
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like to
> gather
> > your opinion on the fo
12, 2015 at 4:37 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Rafael Fonseca
> wrote:
> > I'll stay away from touching port 80 for now, but isn't saving work to
> the
> > admin one of cloudstack's main goals?
> >
> > That is also the ma
Hi Paul,
I'd like to have time to do what you proposed, but unfortunately after
tomorrow i'll be away for almost a week (maybe then, if my changes haven't
been merged yet)
These are just some small details, the bigger changes are noted here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238
Have a l
other processes when tomcat is stopped
- Listen on port 80 with an empty connector to grab hold of the port
(throwing a warning to the user launching httpd as a separate process that
the port is in use)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:30 PM
Keeping a couple of config files for httpd/nginx should be quite easy, we
could configure it optionally (with a prompt) when running the
cloud-setup-management script, for instance.
We can optionally also just configure a redirect rule for port 80 on the
same prompt if user doesn't want proxying, t
sysadmins and developers ;)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 05/12/2015 12:03 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
> > Wido,
> >
> > If we were to recommend proxying with httpd,
vement independent from using or not httpd/nginx in
front of tomcat.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 05/12/2015 11:37 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM,
Weber wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rafael Fonseca
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like to
> gather
> > your opinion on the following:
> >
> > - Fedora 2x runs systemd's c
Hi all,
I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like to gather
your opinion on the following:
- Fedora 2x runs systemd's cockpit on port 9090 by default
This is a deal breaker for the cluster servlet port on this OS, the two
possibilities would be to either pack changes to f
That is a great change Sebastien :)
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:03 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> >
> >> On May 11, 2015, at 4:59 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> >>
> >> So - you can now have git based websites [1]
> >>
> >> Those websites will publish
Parabéns Marco :-)
On May 11, 2015 10:50 AM, "sebgoa" wrote:
> It seems we forgot to announce that Marco was made a committer, my sincere
> apologies
> -
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Marco Sinhoreli to become a comm
What user are you trying to mount with? If using root, try to add
no_root_squash to the exports file on the NFS server, or just mount as a
different user.
Check SELinux, depending on the mountpoint's location, this may be an issue
(check the audit log for avc's or just set to permissive/disabled t
Sorry it took me a few days to get back to you on this.. but here's my
first proposal to fix a few of those issues, plus a few others :)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Apr 26, 2015, at 4:34 PM, Rafael Fon
Congrats Remi :)
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> Congrats Remi!
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> > has asked Remi Bergsma to become a committer and we are pleased to
> > annou
//packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing
>
> > On 27-Apr-2015, at 6:09 pm, ilya wrote:
> >
> > perhaps we need to patch and hard set java to = 1.7 (vs =>1.7) with arch
> type of x86_64 - until we are ready with 1.8..
> >
> > On 4/27/15 7:01 AM, Rafael Fonseca wr
es and
> then reviewed the directory structure)?
>
> In case of the second instance, cloudstack will modify things in
> systemvm.iso it may use the content from the zip file to modify/make the
> iso. Please confirm what route you've taken..
>
> Regards
> ilya
>
> On
Hi there :)
You didn't mention if you were running 32 or 64 bit OS... 32 bit JVM can't
scale over 1.4/1.6Gb Heap size, no matter what you put in the -Xmx option ;)
RF
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Timothy Lothering <
tlother...@datacentrix.co.za> wrote:
> Hi Keerthiraja,
>
> We are on 4.3.0.
branches instead, as these are
> most up to date and actively maintained.
>
> Feel free to send a PR to fix what you think is broken.
>
> Regards,
> Remi
>
>
> > On 26 Apr 2015, at 15:30 , Rafael Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm n
I've started taking a look at the size of the RPMs and the contents.. and
it's really nasty :)
The cloudstack-common package for instance.. has been over 100MB for at
least a few versions... looking into that.. there's a duplication of files
regarding the systemvm iso...
rpm -qlp cloudstack-commo
Hi all,
I'm new to the cloudstack community, but i'm a seasoned developer and
systems engineer and i'm sure i'll be able to help out a lot :)
I've just started on getting cloudstack running on Centos 7.1 and noticed
many problems, which make it NOT work out of the box.
I'll be doing a series of
82 matches
Mail list logo
