RE: Primary Storage algorithm - when having more primary storages

By Default it is first fit - and that means the first one found with enough capacity. This results in the first one returned by the Db ordering to get allocated first until it has capacity. One can choose the algorithm using vm.allocation.algorithm as Abhi mentioned. -Prachi -Original Mess

RE: Unable to add affinity group to instances in project

s in project On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Erik, > Hi Prachi, thanks for coming back to me :-) > Affinity groups feature does not support Projects. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups > >

RE: [QUESTION] Integration Port

From: Stephen Turner Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:59 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Vania Xu; Min Chen; Prachi Damle Subject: RE: [QUESTION] Integration Port Min or Prachi might have some information on this. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Mike

RE: Unable to add affinity group to instances in project

Hi Erik, Affinity groups feature does not support Projects. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups >> It fails for new deployments having affinity group rules as well. Are these new deployments using projectId parameter too? Thanks, Prachi ___

RE: [DISCUSS] Major business logic refactoring: Move from Account to UserAccount

ersonation semantics. Note: the fix will be simple, won't change IAM and this is just to add capability to list VMs for a user ID. > On 21-Nov-2014, at 11:57 pm, Prachi Damle wrote: > > Hi Rohit, > The accountId in deployVm API is serving the purpose of impersonation and can >

RE: [DISCUSS] Major business logic refactoring: Move from Account to UserAccount

cify user_id in both list/deploy VM commands. In case the >userid is not specified, in that case the logged in user¹s ID will be used. > >It¹s open for discussion of course, let me know if it¹s a good idea to >follow the same pattern or strictly use the logged-in user¹s ID? > &g

RE: [DISCUSS] Major business logic refactoring: Move from Account to UserAccount

Rohit, I checked the code here https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/useraccount-refactoring and I don't understand why we need to expose the userId parameter in the deployVm API. I think we should be using the userId of the logged in user always. Ex

RE: [DISCUSS] Major business logic refactoring: Move from Account to UserAccount

Rohit, Just on note on: >>>Min, you’re right I don’t propose to change the IAM model just some >>>additional data that notes who *actually* owns the resource (VM, volume, >>>etc.) in an account which can be useful for sysadmins to list resource by >>>userid etc. Adding 'user_id' column but not

Re: Review Request 26776: CLOUDSTACK-7732 - Automate test cases relating to enabling/disabling of zone/pod/cluster/host

.org/r/26776/ > --- > > (Updated Oct. 15, 2014, 10:43 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, Chandan Purushothama, Prachi Damle, and > Santhosh Edukulla. > > > Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7732 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7732 > > > Repository:

RE: Using Cloudstack API from PHP issue

Here are the steps documented to sign an API request for CloudStack: https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/API_Developers_Guide/signing-api-requests.html I guess, you need to add sorting of query parameters. Prachi -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n.

RE: 4.5 RM

+1 Agree that we need to have some form of CI to control basic quality -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.5 RM > > IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upo

RE: [VOTE] git workflow

-Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 3:23 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: Re: [VOTE] git workflow On Aug 6, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > >> Edison, thank you for raising th

RE: [VOTE] git workflow

>Edison, thank you for raising the concern about the BVT/CI. Somebody mentioned >earlier that we should separate git workflow implementation from the CI >effort, but I do think we have to do in in conjunction. Otherwise what is the >point in introducing staging/develop branch? If there is no da

RE: [VOTE] git workflow

I fail to understand how will this model help us with the maintenance releases? For CloudStack we also keep working on prior releases and ship out maintenance releases. I suppose we will be cutting the maintenance releases from the release branches? So we will have to keep around the release br

RE: [VOTE] git workflow

Sorry if this is already discussed, but few areas that are unclear to me with this process are: - does every fix, however minor it be(say a signle line), needs to be developed in a separate branch? And then we have to merge these individual branches to develop for every fix? - In that case will

Re: Review Request 21776: AWSAPI: cloudstack api on POST requests (instead GET), ssl enabling fixed

> On June 24, 2014, 7:28 p.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 1) EC2Engine.java: I see a lot of new line breaks introduced and its hard > > to know what the changes are. > > Is it possible to clean this or provide a list of changes/line

RE: [HELP] CS GUI does not come up...

logs. Why would the GUI not come up then? Thanks & Regards, Ritu S. -Original Message- From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:54 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Hugo Trippaers Subject: RE: [HELP] CS GUI does not come up... update configura

RE: Comparing storage tags

Mike, Checkout StringUtils might be a potential utility class for handling the tags comparison. cloud-utils/src/com/cloud/utils/StringUtils.java Prachi -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:27 PM To: dev@cloudstack

RE: Documentation on cloud-engine and cloudstack-framework

Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alex Huang; Kelven Yang; Prachi Damle Subject: Re: Documentation on cloud-engine and cloudstack-framework Hi Rohit, Regarding IAM, here is the FS for the work Prachi and I have done: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack

RE: [HELP] CS GUI does not come up...

update configuration set value='false' where name='developer'; This should resolve the error - after updating the db, you will still see some stack trace regarding " CreateProcess error=2" but it will not stop the server from running. Prachi -Original Message- From: Ritu Sabharwal [mail

RE: VM HA on xenserver 6.2

If you set the global setting 'ha.tag' and tag the hosts then those hosts become dedicated HA hosts as you observed. If you want to use all your hosts for regular VM deployments, then you should not ha tag them. Just using 'ha.enabled' service offering while deploying the VMs should be sufficie

RE: Cant build master

I had faced this problem sometime back, here is the thread, check if this applies to your setup: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201403.mbox/%3c75942ed3fd12d64eabe71209bd0f62cc1ba...@sjcpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E Prachi -Original Message- From: Amogh Vasekar [mailt

[ACS 4.4] cherry-pick CLOUDSTACK-7047

Hi Daan, Please can you cherry-pick the following 2 commits to 4.4 CLOUDSTACK-7047 Commit# 40e28de7275804f4483868ba8a737878ff54fba8 Commit# f37b1524892ab805615dbff2c59e5a1d10c116d3 Thanks, Prachi

RE: Why to have API Commands for Admin actions?

To elaborate further, I would like to add that even if this is adding some if-else code around checking the enum value when generating the response, it is replacing several other if-else's that were present in the code earlier that used to check if the user is an Admin/Domain Admin/regular user

Re: Review Request 21776: AWSAPI: cloudstack api on POST requests (instead GET), ssl enabling fixed

handling 3)CloudStackApi.java: - What are the reasons to replace CloudStackCommand by CloudStackQueryBuilder? - Prachi Damle On May 27, 2014, 8:04 p.m., Dmitry Batkovich wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail.

RE: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

>Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements "filter" method (and doesn't call >that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? >ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care "avoid" >parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. T

RE: [DISCUSS] Introducing Gerrit for quality? was: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code quality...

+ 1 to gerrit -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 4:27 PM To: Subject: [DISCUSS] Introducing Gerrit for quality? was: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code quality... Hi all, Seems it's a good timing to bring

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Demetrius Tsitrelis as committer

Congratulations Demetrius! -Original Message- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 4:18 PM To: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Demetrius Tsitrelis as committer Folks - this one's a little belated - we went through the invite process around the time of the mai

RE: Need to revert CLOUDSTACK-5853

Hi Marcus, I have reopened this ticket for 4.4 release, fix needed for this is reverting the code added as part of this in earlier versions. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 1:04 PM To: Marcus Cc: dev

RE: [ACS5.0] IAM feature postponed from 4.4 to 5.0?

Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Prachi Damle wrote: > >For example, there are two accounts and they belong to a group with > >Allow all permissions. If I have to remove some permissions for only > >account 1 but keep them for account 2 is it possible? > > This will

Need to revert CLOUDSTACK-5853

Hi Marcus, This is regarding bug fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5853 I see that as a fix, in ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator we remove the storage pools from avoid set if they happen to match the tag but are found in avoid set. However this fix is not correct since it bre

RE: [ACS5.0] IAM feature postponed from 4.4 to 5.0?

>For example, there are two accounts and they belong to a group with >Allow all permissions. If I have to remove some permissions for only >account 1 but keep them for account 2 is it possible? This will be decided depending on whether Deny has higher precedence over Allow or the other way. If

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer

Congratulations Amogh! -Original Message- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 11:14 AM To: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Amogh Vasekar to become a committer an

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congratulations Saksham! -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer Congrats Saksham :) On 28/05/14 11:47 PM, "sebgoa" wrote: >The Proj

Re: [ACS44]Cherry-pick CLOUDSTACK-6476

t; wrote: >> Prachi, >> >> It seems to me that this is only a refactor/rename of a function. What >> has functionally changed/am I missing? >> >> regards, >> Daan (all for the refactor but it doesn't pertain to the comment of the

[ACS44]Cherry-pick CLOUDSTACK-6476

Hi Daan, Can you please cherry-pick the following commit to 4.4: Commit 3448ab7f1c5c15949855788b029028ddac01327b CLOUDSTACK-6476 Basic Zone with Multiple Pods Setup: DHCP server doesnt get deployed in the pod where the VM gets deployed Tha

RE: [ACS5.0] IAM feature postponed from 4.4 to 5.0?

Few of the areas of current APIs which are not compatible with a correct IAM model: A]For List APIs: 1) Current implementation of the list APIs is tied tightly with the default roles (root admin,domainadmin, regular user). 2) The List APIs do not follow the listing parameters in a standard way

[ACS44]cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6581

Hi Hugo/Daan, Can you please cherry-pick following to 4.4: Commit hash:eb28f77d1a07e902577a38194196b463ba5aef42 CLOUDSTACK-6581: IAM - Shared Network -Root Admin user is allowed to deploy VM in a shared network that is scoped for a specific domain/account. Contained in branches: 4.4-forward

[ACS44]cherry pick 2 IAM bugs

Hi Daan/Hugo, Can you please cherry-pick following 2 commits to 4.4 branch: 1. CLOUDSTACK-6558 IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group. Commit hash:e89c628843692c9e7046192f5b6d4893b7a45ec6 1.

RE: [ACS44]cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6517

Yes, I will check my work environment again for this. Prachi -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:37 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [ACS44]cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6517 On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Prachi Damle wrote

[ACS44]cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6517

Hi Hugo/Daan, Can you please cherry-pick following to 4.4: Commit hash:e14c2ec7241ec2333ea3ac3d56a0e938fe1bf131 CLOUDSTACK-6517: IAM - Admin is allowed to create PortFowarding rule for a regular user, when admin does not have " UseEntry" permission for IpAddress. Contained in branches: 4.4-

RE: 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start

/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-engine-schema -core-daos-context.xml. Thanks -min On 4/30/14 10:57 AM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: >I synced to latest 4.4-forward and the server fails to start. > >Anyone seeing this? > >Thanks, >Prachi

4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start

I synced to latest 4.4-forward and the server fails to start. Anyone seeing this? Thanks, Prachi

[ACS44] cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6458

Hi Hugo/Daan, Could you please cherry-pick following 2 commits to 4.4 branch? Commit bc3a8378d0e58ad53f862b6102c0dfa39d97a06a Commit 81adee346cd5135234207717d0243d174e0f116c CLOUDSTACK-6458 IAM - When a domain is deleted , the group created

RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

ve been so slow today in getting those logs...been in a lot of meetings. If the fix works, I guess I can skip sending the logs to you. Thanks! On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Mike, > > I think I know what's going on with basic zone shared network, I will >

[ACS44] cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-6474

Hi Hugo/Daan, Could you please cherry-pick following commit to 4.4 branch? Commit hash:be10b32b273bed1a1492f02b943b168195e762c0 CLOUDSTACK-6474: IAM - Not able to list shared networks that is created with scope="all" Thanks, Prachi

4.4 release dashboard in ACS JIRA

Hi Hugo/Daan, Will it be possible for you to setup a 4.4 release dashboard in JIRA and share it? It will be helpful to track all issues getting logged for 4.4. Thanks, Prachi

RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

14 11:36 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?) Sure, np Let me retrieve that and get back to you. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Thanks Mike. Will you be able to share your management server logs and >

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba

Congratulations Go! -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:50 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Go Chiba On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > The Project Managemen

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk

Congratulations Alena! -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Menber: Alena Prokharchyk On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > The Projec

Re: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

code. > No upgrade involved. > > Thanks! > Mike > >> On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Prachi Damle wrote: >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while checking access >> to the network but this user. >> >> F

RE: [ACS4.4] Error while deploying VM (network related?)

Hi Mike, This looks to be an error thrown by the IAM service while checking access to the network by this user. Few questions to track down the problem: 1) Was this network newly created on 4.4? Or did you upgrade to 4.4 and this network already existed? 2) Do you know if this is a shared netwo

Re: Review Request 20389: CLOUDSTACK-6416: fixed postinstall.sh script to fetch cloudstack snapshot from appropriate branch.

correct branch - 4.2 in this case, looks ok. This changes is to be applied on 4.2 only. - Prachi Damle On April 15, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit

Re: 4.4 Automation blocked - CLOUDSTACK-6324

Yes, this is fixed by 2 commits: 43ce83202d9370f49c389fd06e7d258df057dc9d 3ee55cd17b941b1fdb1e0bb150bebfb8ece8155d Sorry for the blocking error. Prachi > On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:44 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" > wrote: > > I believe Prachi fixed it yesterday. Prachi? > > -Alena. > > On 4/1/14, 10:

RE: [ACS4.4][QA] https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/CLOUDSTACK-6303

It was a bug in IAMService during Project account cleanup. This bug affected only if Projects feature was being used. This has been fixed in 4.4 and master now. Prachi -Original Message- From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 2:08 PM To: dev

RE: [ACS4.4][QA] https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/CLOUDSTACK-6303

I took a look at it, will provide the fix soon. Prachi -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 12:27 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS4.4][QA] https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/CLOUDSTACK-6303 Can s

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

. I am afraid I do not know why these jars are needed or were added to this project. Prachi From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 2:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Likitha Shetty; Prachi Damle Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round

IAM guidelines for CS APIs

Hi there, With the introduction of the IAM feature, there are some new annotations/mechanisms to implement access control at CS API and Service layer. Min and I have documented guidelines to follow while adding APIs to CloudStack: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack

RE: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Just a thought about the squashed merge, if there are multiple developers working on a feature branch as in this case, won't it be better to preserve the change history? -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 9:35 AM To: dev@cloudstac

RE: Affinity Groups and Project

Yes Affinity Groups feature does not support projects. This is mentioned in the FS for that feature, check the FAQ part https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups You should probably log a ticket to change the display result for project view. Thank

RE: 4.3 vote

John, I could not reproduce this broken build on 4.3 after wiping out my entire repository. 1. rm -rf ~/.m2/repository 2. mvn clean install -Pawsapi My build is successful. Can someone who is able to reproduce this check this further? Prachi [INFO] --

RE: master branch DbUtilTest failure

that EncryptionSecretKeyChecker won't look for \etc\cloudstack\management\key)] Prachi -Original Message----- From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 3:35 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: master branch DbUtilTest failure Yes! The surefire log prints this:

RE: master branch DbUtilTest failure

, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi, > > I am facing this error while doing a clean install on latest master. > > It fails running 'com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest' with error 'Could not > initialize class com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy' > > I am on Windows. A

master branch DbUtilTest failure

Hi, I am facing this error while doing a clean install on latest master. It fails running 'com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest' with error 'Could not initialize class com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy' I am on Windows. Anyone seeing this? Any ideas to fix? Prachi [INFO] ---

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Hugo, Just wanted to inform that myself and Min had proposed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5920 which was not listed below due to wrong ticket type it had. I updated the type and now it should show in your list. Thanks, Prachi From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Beh

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

+1 for pushing out the feature freeze to 3/28. Most of us have been busy with 4.3 and so it will be good to have some extra room to focus fully on our 4.4 features. Myself and Min are working on the IAM feature (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5920) and I feel that 3/28 will g

RE: [PROPOSAL] List VM API enhancement

Yes, agree to this as well. Accordingly we need to handle the getEntityOwnerId() dependency. -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 10:06 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] List VM API enhancement +1 It's

RE: Run In memory event bus by default

Murali, Also we already have a MessageBus being used at couple of places to publish messages to other components about certain scenario. e.g: When reserved capacity for a VM that is stopped for time greater than configured threshold is freed up, CapacityManager publishes a message that is being

RE: AWS EC2 Compatibility Interface

Hi Ian, For EC2 REST authentication you do not need to use the script cloudstack-aws-api-register - the script is useful for SOAP only to register the certificate. For REST you just need the keys that you can obtain by logging in to CloudStack UI as a root admin and generate the signature for t

RE: [DISCUSS] api level access controll

Hi Anton and Dan, Yes these usecases can be satisfied with the IAM feature being developed (CLOUDSTACK-5920) Anton, For the customer care portal case - the steps will be to create a custom policy and choose the specifc APIs the accounts/group of accounts having this policy can invoke. For read

Re: Review Request 17120: added an extra column to mark the imported ldap users as from ldap

> On Jan. 24, 2014, 6:52 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > I see many files unrelated to this fix have been updated and present in the > > patch. > > Please can you update the patch with changes needed for the fix only? > > > > Following are some such

Re: Review Request 17120: added an extra column to mark the imported ldap users as from ldap

> On Jan. 24, 2014, 6:52 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > I see many files unrelated to this fix have been updated and present in the > > patch. > > Please can you update the patch with changes needed for the fix only? > > > > Following are some such

RE: Tags on storagePool

rage_tag' >> >>>>>>>>>> instead of 'true'. This wouldn't require any major logic >> changes, >> >>>>> just the >> >>>>>>>>>> value used to check whether someth

Re: Review Request 17120: added an extra column to mark the imported ldap users as from ldap

/VmwareDatacenterApiUnitTest.java - Prachi Damle On Jan. 22, 2014, 7:24 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

RE: [Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920)

-Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:41 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920) On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:57 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Min and myself would like

RE: [Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920)

s per API per group/policy anyway analogous to current commands.properties. And maintaining it in two different sets (api permissions + permissions for entity access per broader category) can make it tricky when we need to create custom policies. > > >- >Thanks, >Rajani >_____

RE: [Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920)

is a separate service that can be enhanced by 3rd parties. >As an example, I want to provide my DBaaS service on an ACS-powered cloud. >I want to utilize the same Principals (and IAM infrastructure) rather >than provide my own. > >-- >Chiradeep > > > >On 1/21/14 2:01 PM, &quo

RE: [Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920)

n an ACS-powered cloud. I want to utilize the same Principals (and IAM infrastructure) rather than provide my own. -- Chiradeep On 1/21/14 2:01 PM, "Erik Weber" wrote: >On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Prachi Damle >wrote: > >> Min and myself would like to propose an identity and

[Proposal]CloudStack IAM plugin feature (CLOUDSTACK-5920)

Min and myself would like to propose an identity and access management plugin for CloudStack for the ACS 4.4 release. Here is the functional spec we have drafted for the first phase: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Identity+and+Access+Management+%28IAM%29+Plugin

RE: AWSAPI not working in 4.3

@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Prachi Damle Subject: RE: AWSAPI not working in 4.3 Copying Prachi to the thread. Animesh -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 7:01 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: AWSAPI not working in 4.3 Hi, In

RE: Increase max number of VMs in a host?

Hi Indra, You need to call the updateHypervisorCapabilities API and set the 'maxguestslimit' to a new value for the KVM hypervisor. The listHypervisorCapabilities API will let you know the necessary ID of the capability to be updated. Prachi -Original Message- From: Indra Pramana [mail

RE: Best wishes this holiday season, and here's to a strong 2014 for CloudStack!

Wishing all happy holidays and a happy new year!! Prachi -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 6:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Best wishes this holiday season, and here's to a strong 2014 for CloudStack! H

RE: Loading order of Adapter components

Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:30 PM To: Prachi Damle Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Loading order of Adapter components The names are cases sensitive. Is there a reason you put the name as lowercase in the global configuration? Darren

Loading order of Adapter components

Hi Darren, I am trying to add a new implementation of SecurityChecker interface which is an Adapter. I am adding a plugin - RoleBasedChecker, and I want to add it to the list of SecurityCheckers at first position. However the new checker gets added to the list at the last position. The order

RE: VMEntityVO and VMInstanceVO

Koushik, My comments inline. Prachi -Original Message- From: Koushik Das Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:06 AM To: Prachi Damle; Subject: Re: VMEntityVO and VMInstanceVO Thanks Prachi. I was looking at CLOUDSTACK-5458 when I came across this. I don't quite follow the log

RE: VMEntityVO and VMInstanceVO

many other entities for which this has been done so far, Alex has put everything under cloud-engine-schema recently where you can find some more of such examples. Prachi -Original Message- From: Koushik Das Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:50 PM To: Cc: Prachi Damle Subject: Re: VMEn

Re: Help In Launch instance Schedule policy

used, > it all use the algorithm of firstfit algorithm, cause it implement the plan > method. > Is this a bug or developer should implement this method, or did i miss > something in the global configuration ? > > > > 2013/11/23 Prachi Damle > >> Hi Yitao

RE: Help In Launch instance Schedule policy

Hi Yitao, CloudStack scheduling policies are implemented by the DeploymentPlanner and HostAllocator/StoragePoolAllocator components. If you want to take a look at the source code of these components, this will tell you where to look: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Dep

RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ?

But in general, is there a way to get hold of a particular bean by name or type? -Original Message- From: Prachi Damle Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 1:19 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ? I used to call getComponent() to get the

RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ?

already have a list of AffinityGroupProcessors injected to the class. Can't you just loop through those? Darren On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Thanks Darren, it is the listAffinityGroupTypes API, specific code is in > AffinityGroupServiceImpl :: listAffinit

RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ?

ren > On Nov 5, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > > Hi, > > Before the Spring modularization, we have some usecases that were using the > com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext class directly to inject or to > find a bean of given type or name by invoking

ComponentContext :: getComponent() ?

Hi, Before the Spring modularization, we have some usecases that were using the com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext class directly to inject or to find a bean of given type or name by invoking ComponentContext :: getComponent(). How should these usecases be ported now after the modulariz

RE: haPlanners error in fresh 4.2 checkout

rver.handle(Server.java:326) > >> at > >> org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:542) > >> at > >> > org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection > .jav > >> a:945) > >>

RE: haPlanners error in fresh 4.2 checkout

I had encountered this sometime back ... you need to check if your componentContext.xml or its equivalent has following defined. However I do see it is present in the 4.2 branch -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, O

RE: Tags on storagePool

Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:36 PM To: Prachi Damle; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Tags on storagePool I came across a potential bug in the way allocators do volumes placement on storage, based on storage tags. Prachi, can you please confirm if the bug is real. The tags ar

RE: S3 API broken in 4.2

, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Yes, either moving the line to constructor or using a local SearchBuilder > will fix it - however the S3 APIs part in awsapi project is not supported or > updated for a long time and may have many other issues to get it working. > >

RE: S3 API broken in 4.2

Yes, either moving the line to constructor or using a local SearchBuilder will fix it - however the S3 APIs part in awsapi project is not supported or updated for a long time and may have many other issues to get it working. Prachi -Original Message- From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darre

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi

Congrats Animesh! -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Animesh Chaturvedi Congrats Animesh. On 21/10/13 12:51 PM, "La Motta, David" wrote: >Awe

RE: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner?

-Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:50 AM To: Subject: Re: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner? On 17-Oct-2013, at 11:29 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Koushik, > > I don't think you should add this check

RE: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner?

} } -Koushik On 17-Oct-2013, at 3:21 AM, Prachi Damle mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com>> wrote: -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com<http://citrix.com>] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:21 AM To: mailto:dev@

  1   2   >