Rohit,
On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> This looks great, Chiradeep can you share with us how the networking will
> work in case of using systemvms in LXC containers, how it will communicate
> with outside world and with other instances running in shared/separate LXC
> container
tenant (e.g. think database-as-a-service).
There is a lot of ground to cover... I would also like us to put together a
test rig like devstack where all of these pieces can come together.
Pedro.
On Dec 1, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath
wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Is there a docum
Daan,
On Nov 28, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H,
>
> Someone queried for the status of the contrail plugin and I noticed
> that the package structure is different then the other network
> plugins. The difference being that the contrail classes have
> 'contrail' in their package name
Hugo,
Small correction bellow...
On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my
> presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like
> to check it against your combined knowledg
Darren,
On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> This is fixed now.
Maybe i'm doing something really dumb... but i still see the problem.
I do see the commit afaf637 in the branch history.
Steps to reproduce:
1. plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/test/resources/mysql_db_st
Darren,
On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> Yeah I think it would be great to talk about this at CCC. I'm
> hesitant to further narrow down the definition of the network. For
> example, I think OpenStack's Neutron is fundamentally flawed because
> they defined a network as
On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> I definitely don't want the setup to be done at a zone level.
Why ? That seems to me the most obvious way to do it.
There are different networking solutions: e.g. VLANs and overlays such as
OpenContrail that assume an L3 switching topolog
Prasana,
On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:18:29AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote:
>>
>> We have an integration test which requires spawning a "mysql" db,
>> initialize it and then go through the process of creati
Darren,
I generally agree with you... just trying to point out what could be pitfalls
on the way to evolve the system.
On Oct 9, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
>
> I wish we were doing transaction per API, but I don't think that was
> ever a consideration. I do think the sync portion
Darren,
My assumption when I tried to make sense of the transaction code is that the
underlying motivation is that the code is trying to create a transaction per
API call and then allow multiple modules to implement that API call...
i.e. the intent is do use a bit of what i would call a "web-serv
Darren,
On Oct 9, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
> Pedro,
>
> I completely understand what you are saying as I think this is a gap
> too I would like to address. I'm thinking of something a little
> bigger and grander than what you would need right now so that's not
> helpful, as I wo
Darren,
Using ActionEvents is not desirable for the plugin either... today CloudStack
lacks the ability for a component/plugin to associate itself to the life-cycle
of an object. It would be ideal if there was a generic way to accomplish that...
The contrail plugin wants to know about project cre
Chip,
On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail
> branch.
>
> I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new files in
> that branch. I think we have to complete the following in order to merg
On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:36 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:59:24PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>>> 3) I'd love if we could get some consensus on what additional tests and /
>>> or changes to the test approach
On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Pedro Roque Marques
> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>>
>>> Ideally, we would have a design document on the wiki that would help
>
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> Ideally, we would have a design document on the wiki that would help
> everyone understand the implementation. We're not looking for a design
> doc for Contrail / OpenContrail... we're looking for information about
> the integration itself.
nth release cycle and we are just concluding the current release. The
>> next release is ACS 4.3.0 and for which tentative feature freeze date is
>> October 31st. Let us know if you have any questions
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Animesh
>>
>>
>>
>
Myself and a few others in the Contrail team have been working on a cloudstack
network plugin that interfaces with the contrail VNC
(http://www.opencontrail.org). At the moment the plugin provides isolated guest
networks (and a virtualized "Public" network) as an overlay that is capable of
inte
Mike,
If you create a cloudstack-management package and run
"cloudstack-setup-management" before starting the management server you can
run the MS as user cloud without experiencing these issues...
It sets up the correct privileges.
Pedro.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
I've bumped into exceptions with similar signature in the past when the
database schema has not been updated to match the Dao objects.
Check whether the cloud.cluster database has all the fields listed in the
select statement displayed in the exception.
Pedro.
On Aug 10, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Vi
On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal Lafferty
> wrote:
>
>> I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned to
>> CloudMonkey to automate setup of my test environment.
>>
>> This led to a blog on automating with CloudMonk
21 matches
Mail list logo
