4.15.1/Vmware
When you create reoccurring volume snapshot task, instead of transferring only
that volume all volumes that are associated with VM are transferred to
secondary storage.
Way how we find this is that we have some VM with 8~TB disks that should not be
backed up and our secondary sto
@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks
>
> Thanks Kristaps, Wido, Rohit and Alex for your replies.
>
> I am fine with not having stateful dhcpv6 and privacy extension/temporary
> address in phase 1. If community decides not to do eventually , it
Hi Wei,
Published this month’s RFC 9099 and explains in different words/perspective
what has been written by Alex, Rohit and Wido.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9099.html
On 2021/08/17 09:20:21, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> (cc to Rohit and Alex)
>
> It is a good suggestion to use F
gt; /64 network
>
> And voila all done! I create a domain record that points to my guest
> VM IPv6 address a test webserver on
> http://ipv6-isolated-ntwk-demo.yadav.cloud/
>
> (Note: I'll get rid of the tunnel and request a new /48 block after a few
> days, sharing
_dvd_KVM\123.iso
Oscdimg.exe -u2 -bC:\ \expandedSetup\boot\etfsboot.com -h
C:\ \expandedSetup C:\ \Win7.iso
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 at 14:08, technologyrss.mail <
technologyrss.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *yes some is ok.*
>
> but how can I check
>
> iso contain correct drivers for h
10:50:41, "technologyrss.mail"
wrote:
> when windows installation done,
> then I remove iso and reboot vm then I see this error.
>
> *--**
> **Alamin*
>
> On 7/30/2021 4:46 PM, Kristaps Cudars wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Usually it indicates
Hello,
Usually it indicates that installation media/iso is corrupted.
Its polite toon to ask such questions in users mailing list.
On 2021/07/30 10:37:20, "technologyrss.mail"
wrote:
> *Hi,*
>
> I install windows 10 vm but can't access. I see some error.
>
> What is issue? Please help me.
>
Hi Wido,
In context of size I would recommend sticking with RIPE guidelines.
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690
Reminder:
/56 256 LAN segments
/48 65,536 LAN segments
Maybe it will sound counter intuitive but I’m also not excited about OSPFv3 or
BGP on VR.
As in our case it
.
On 2021/07/19 09:05:54, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> Op 16-07-2021 om 21:46 schreef Kristaps Cudars:
> > Hi Wido,
> >
> > Your proposal is to sacrifice ability to reassign IPv6 to instance, have
> > internal domain prefix, and list/db in ACS what IPv6
Hi Wido,
Your proposal is to sacrifice ability to reassign IPv6 to instance, have
internal domain prefix, and list/db in ACS what IPv6 has been assigned to what
instance and go with RA and SLAAC. For route signaling to switch use BGP/OSPFv3
or manual pre-creation.
Option with RA and managed fl
Hi Wido,
DHCPv6 is not an option?
It enables feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6 in context of VR.
Or there are some advantages in RA and SLAAC?
On 2021/07/15 15:10:38, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> Op 15-07-2021 om 17:05 schreef Kristaps Cudars:
> > Hi Wido,
> >
uter Advertisements with SLAAC is much better supported in Operating
> Systems then DHCPv6 is.
>
> Wido
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kristaps Cudars
> > Sent: 13 July 2
Hi Wido,
What is benefit of using Route Advertisement on internal VR networks?
In drawing VR is in VPC mode how it will work for isolated network where
external link/ip is not assigned initially?
On 2021/07/15 14:47:24, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> But you still need routing. See the attache
Hi Hean,
You still need to create route on L3 SW that will point /64 VM
On 2021/07/15 10:39:13, Hean Seng wrote:
> Or explain like this :
>
> 1) Cloudstack generate list of /64 subnet from /48 that Network admin
> assigned to Cloudstack
> 2) Cloudsack allocated the subnet (that generated from
Hi Wido,
Can you explain why “DHCPv6 as much as possible as that's not really the
intended use-case” it’s not intended use-case?
On 2021/07/15 09:31:26, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> Op 14-07-2021 om 16:44 schreef Hean Seng:
> > Hi
> >
> > I replied in another thread, i think do not need
t may not allow you larger email and
> doc/attachments. If there are any documents you want to share, can you say
> put them on Google docs and share the link with dev list? Thanks.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> ________
> From: Kristaps Cudars
> Sent: Wedn
Hi Alex,
No BGP or NAT66 on VR.
Route insert in to L3 handled or list acquired from ACS api.
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 19:05, Hean Seng wrote:
> Yes, sorry for that, can use NAT 6 also .I mentiioned DHCP6 , and you
> can point the gateway to /48 gw, and this does not need any BGP. Maintain
>
Pony Mail is blocking me :(
Hi,
Elaborating on my previous email.
In my opinion SLAAC (StateLess Address Auto Configuration) is not good
candidate for VR as it was created for situations of connecting million
devices with less amount of effort and no micromanagement needed.
One example that com
Hi,
I would like to argue that implementer dynamic routing protocol and associated
security problems/challenges with it to have IPv6 route inserted in L3 router/s
is not a good goal.
In my opinion dynamic routing on VR would be interesting to scale availability
of service across several datace
OpenVPN is SSL/TLS VPN and it has no support for IPSec. OpenVPN should coexist
with Strongswan. OpenVPN is ment for vpn client connective many to one.
Strongswan is meant for P2P connectivity.
On 2021/06/10 08:39:14, Rudraksh MK wrote:
> Hey!
>
> I’m personally a strong proponent of Wireguard
20 matches
Mail list logo
