Been a while since I looked at this stuff. It might be worth it to look at
the VSphere implementation as that does something similar to what you're
trying to achieve and what Rafael mentions. In effect you could view
CloudStack as the federation of multiple VSphere endpoints, in your case
one or mo
Perhaps it would be nice to put the logging in all the GURUs so you can
actually see which
ones are used, and how it is used ?
Cheers,
Funs
> On 23 Oct 2015, at 11:21, Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> As I said in previous mail, the request should be sent to
> KVMHypervisorGuru, not others.
> Mike, can yo
Congrats and welcome back :)
On Thursday, 1 October 2015, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Congrats Daan !
> Welcome !
>
> -Wei
>
>
> 2015-10-01 12:07 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland >:
>
> > Hello fellow stackers,
> >
> > This to let you know that I just entered the building of Leaseweb, in
> order
> > to be working
Hi Seb,
Love the idea, let’s do it!
Cheers,
Funs
> On 26 Jun 2015, at 10:14, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> A few of us are in Amsterdam at DevOps days. We are chatting about release
>> management procedure.
>> Remi is w
Hi Seb,
Great way of wording it, and I completely agree! You should be able to pick up
master and roll it out into production and keep running with it!
Cheers,
Funs
> On 11 Jun 2015, at 23:43, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 6:43 PM, John Burwell wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
eeds to be decided what is the best way to manage lifecycle.
> If CS is able to manage the lifecycle then it can be similar to existing VR
> (spinning up instances when required). If managed externally, then a
> pre-created pool of appliances needs to be registered from CS and used.
>
>
Hi Christian and Paul,
I agree that the VR/VPC construct could do with some improvements, the biggest
being that it should actually be api driven and allow for more flexible
networking/services combined with scale out itself (we’re looking into this
actually). All of these things bring along th
Hi,
For the record, VMware nsx-mh not VMware nsx-vsphere, as they are different
products.
Cheers,
Funs
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi Alireza,
>
> Yes, NSX works just fine with CloudStack. We run this in production on
> XenServer and KVM and are currently running 4.4. There
Daan,
I can confirm that a fresh checkout of master and a build of marvin after the
apidoc works for
me too.
Cheers,
Funs
> On 16 Apr 2015, at 21:46, Funs Kessen wrote:
>
> Daan,
>
> I did the same, but noticed it’s the cloudstack-marvin plugin, so am doing it
> aga
k at other marvin jobs. At first glance they all seem to
> feel. (4.4, 4.5 etc.)
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Funs Kessen wrote:
>> Hi Raja,
>>
>> It seems there is no relation between what Daan was talking about and this
>> problem as far as I can see.
&
-marvin/1723/console
>
> Daan, not sure if the change you were planning to do will address this issue?
>
> Raj
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:47 PM
> To: Roger Crerie
> Cc: dev@cloudstac
it now.
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Funs Kessen wrote:
>> Hi Daan,
>>
>>> On 27 Mar 2015, at 11:58, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>>
>>> Funs, I commented on it, I think it has a typo in it.
>>> Roger, can you apply that patch and test (
i, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Funs Kessen wrote:
>> Hi Daan,
>>
>> Had a fix ready yesterday, but after having slept on it, I crushed the fix
>> as it was wrong. I’ve fixed it by setting the separator hard, and not to
>> File.separator.
>>
>> The logic
instead of making it work, as the code
should not be platform independent but specifically for the Agent.
I’ve got pull request #133 open which should resolve the issues on Windows.
Cheers,
Funs
> On 26 Mar 2015, at 21:53, Funs Kessen wrote:
>
>
>> On 26 Mar 2015, at 21:41, Daan
Congrats Rohit, awesome!
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 09:20, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>
> Congratz Rohit, well deserved! :-)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 27 Mar 2015, at 09:08, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased to
>> announce that
Hi Rohit,
At the moment I’m looking into doing something with a much lighter and quite
flexible alternative for the VR. I was actually thinking of using Tiny Core OS
as a base, it has a great packaging system with loop mounts and is very simple
and tiny compared to the VR we have now (tens of M
> On 26 Mar 2015, at 21:41, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Funs Kessen wrote:
>> Hi Roger/Daan,
>>
>> Sorry for coming late to the party, and my apologies in advance!
>
> that's alright, i learned something about cs;)
>
Di
through a build. My biggest issue I guess is an update from the
> source cause a slew of new build problems which didn't exist before. I guess
> that teaches me to update my source ;).
>
> Roger
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Funs Kessen [mailto:fozzielump
d not '\' as defined by
>> File.serparator.
>>
>> Again this is probably a Cygwin on windows issue BUT the wiki does say to
>> use Cygwin when developing on windows. Thoughts?
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
t;
> Regards
>
>
>
> Paul Angus
>
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Funs Kessen [mailto:fozzielumpk...@gmail.com
> ] *On Behalf Of
> *Funs Kessen
> *Sent:* 13 Ma
Hey Paul,
OVM and OVM3 have nothing to do with each other, they are completely separated
code wise. The stats collection in OVM3 is done via the cloudstack plugin in
the agent rather than native via the agent report socket. In Ovm3.2 and Ovm 3.3
the implementation also differs as 3.3 supports a
le deployed a data center post the revert on simulator, it worked.
>
> Please check. It seems, TransactionLegacy now implements Closeable, new
> change under master, will check the reported issues for coverity to this file
> separately post the analysis.
>
> Regards,
>
e method is based on the right runId it
> throws an exception.
> And I suspect the original transaction is getting rolled back because we are
> trying to close a transaction that is already closed.
>
> Thanks,
> Likitha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Funs Kesse
{
> txn.rollback();
> s_logger.warn("Unexpected exception, ", e);
> throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage(), e);
> }finally {
> txn.close();
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Likitha
>
> -Original Mes
gt; Hugo
>
> On 10 jul. 2014, at 10:58, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>
> > Doesn't seem related to that particular commit, the function
> invalidateRunSession appears to be dead code.
> >
> > I'll do some digging.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
&
introduced by part of commit
> a600d8408ea86782318139c17cf346c8497943d0
>
> Funs, Santhosh fixed this problem yesterday.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7079 has more details.
>
> Thanks,
> Likitha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Funs Kessen [mailto:fkes...@schube
Hi Devs,
I recently noticed on master that after starting, stopping and starting the
management server again I get stacktraces about every second.
After some digging with Daan we found that part of the
a600d8408ea86782318139c17cf346c84979943d0 commit causes this. The problem is
however deeper r
: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:42 PM
To: Funs Kessen
Cc: CloudStack Dev; Sebastien Goasguen; Funs Kessen
Subject: Re: Review Request 22814: The OVM3 module itself
OK, Thanks Funs. Will give it a go sometime later this week.
On 23 June 2014 13:32, Funs Kessen
mailto:fkes...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
2014 9:06 PM
> To: CloudStack Dev; Sebastien Goasguen
> Cc: Funs Kessen
> Subject: Re: Review Request 22814: The OVM3 module itself
>
> Is there any initial setup to be done on OVM Server or is it as simple as
> selecting OVM on cloudstack with the username / password?
>
-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22814/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Funs Kessen
/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Funs Kessen
-410to420.sql ebbcfef
setup/db/templates.sql 20180f5
ui/dictionary.jsp 16ecbab
ui/scripts/docs.js 32237f3
ui/scripts/system.js 64e4f5c
ui/scripts/templates.js 8c63ce2
ui/scripts/zoneWizard.js 13630c1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22809/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Funs
release are you aiming
> > for?
> >
> > The 100,000 euro question is... are you looking at x86 and/or SPARC
> > architectures?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Paul Angus
> > Cloud Architect
> > S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: Cloudy
uot; demand for it.
>
>
>
>
> From: "Paul Angus"
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:59 PM
> To: "Funs Kessen" , "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
>
> Subject: RE: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support
> We certainly get clients/potential
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Funs Kessen [mailto:]
> Sent: 23 April 2014 14:00
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Donal Lafferty
> Subject: Re: Oracle VM (OVM) Server support
>
> Hi Donal and others,
>
> I've been working p
Hi Donal and others,
I've been working part timeon the code for literally a bit over a month,
based on snippets I had. The need for the OVM3 integration was initially
something that had quite some pressure behind it when the discussion
started, but unfortunately evaporated.
The initial work I did
n.c...@citrix.com'; 'sudi...@gmail.com'
Cc: 'Daan Hoogland (daan.hoogl...@gmail.com)'; Funs Kessen;
'dev@cloudstack.apache.org'; 'Hugo Trippaers'
Subject: FW: (CLOUDSTACK-692) The CleanupSnapshotBackup process on SSVM deletes
snapshots that are still in t
ode change.
> Can we do something in userspace? What about the software watchdog
> that is available?
> Along the lines of: http://goo.gl/oO3Lzr
> http://linux.die.net/man/8/watchdog
>
>
> On 9/5/13 7:13 AM, "Funs Kessen" wrote:
>
> >
> >> Well, y
> Well, you can't as far as I've looked in the source of panic.c. So I'm
> thinking of
> investigating of adding -1 as an option and seeing if I can push halt in,
> let's hope
> the guys that do kernel stuff find this useful too.
>
So it seems the patch, I conjured up for panic.c, is seen
Well, you can't as far as I've looked in the source of panic.c. So I'm thinking
of investigating of adding -1 as an option and seeing if I can push halt in,
let's hope the guys that do kernel stuff find this useful too.
Cheers,
Funs
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 sep. 2013, at 23:35, "Marcus S
Hi There,
Well to be honest this is something on my, ever expanding, shortlist.
There are a couple of "interesting" challenges here. The first and foremost is
that an integration with OVM 3.2.X is different than 2.x. As Oracle decided to
rewrite the entire API layer which renders the Cloudstack
,
networking, pod, cluster, hypervisors, primary and secondary storage.
Thanks,
Funs Kessen
Hi Guys,
After doing a fresh checkout yesterday I noticed that 4.1 would not build due
to the client/pom.xml still containing UCS (so I commented it out) and the
"plugins/network-elements/dns-notifier/resources/components-example.xml" still
had addDefaultBaremetalProvidersToPhysicalNetwork whic
10150/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
Took a fresh checkout, did the changes, compiled, ran cloudmonkey and presto I
had a couple of VMs
Thanks,
Funs Kessen
44 matches
Mail list logo
