What all happened with the work to embed tomcat or jetty? Seems like that
could help with these issues.
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 9:23 PM, ilya wrote:
>
> The stock tomcat 6.0.24 is poorly maintained by CentOS/RedHat.
>
> We've seen several issues with latest 6.0.24.x tomcat builds.
>
> We also
>
> Can you make a PR that updates the README with this config option…
Done.
>
> thanks
>
>> On Aug 6, 2015, at 3:07 AM, Carlos Reategui wrote:
>>
>> BTW I figured out how to force the cli to send v2. It would still be nice
>> to update Ec2Stack though:
>>
>> aws configure set profile..
How about having the installer check if 9090 is in use and ask for an
alternative port if so.
I guess this would mean you first have to make the port configurable. During
upgrades the check would not be made and leave the config as is.
> On May 12, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
>
>I have no IE righ here, but the 'never' setting seems to be a problem. I
> would love to see it going away but if that creates bugreports or confusion
> for users then it is no fun. Would you agree in having that 'now' thing only
> for IE for safety?
>
Here you go: http://dev.modern.ie/
BTW If anyone wants to upvote the the key management GUI Jira here it is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1230
> On Dec 2, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
>
> I’m all for providing choice, but not when one of them is not a good/secure
> one.
>
>
I’m all for providing choice, but not when one of them is not a good/secure one.
> On Dec 2, 2014, at 9:48 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>
> It's not our place to enforce how users authenticate to their VMs. We provide
> flexible options, suggest best practices, and let them use the tool as best
>
d will
> port it to later versions.
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> What is it looking for?
>
> Where is that code? Maybe I can have a look.
>
> On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9
What is it looking for?
Where is that code? Maybe I can have a look.
On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> 2014-09-29 09:56:03,519 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade430to431] (main:null) updating
> vlan URIs
> 2
Oct 6, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I am not sure Carlos, but I think it was due to a fix of some other network
> related issue in 4.3.1. I thought we wrote an update/fix for it. So I am
> looking at how your env missed out.
>
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Carlos
it. So I am
> looking at how your env missed out.
>
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Sure, but I am not sure if the problem happened when I upgraded to 4.3.0 or
> 4.3.1. When (what version) did the broadcast_uri in the network table
> require an entr
bug in our upgrade scripts. Can you describe the
> scenario in a ticket?
>
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Hmm. I just checked another deployment I did with 4.4.0 using the same zone
> type and network offering and it has the broadcast_uri set to vlan:
ll? Should be vlan://untagged
>
>
> From: Carlos Reátegui
> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
> Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 12:48 PM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
> Cc: Daan Hoogland
> Subject: Re: Can't launch VMs
>
>
er hits line 1025 instead.
> So, check your Œnetworks¹ table and see if the URI is correct.
>
>
> From: Carlos Reátegui
> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
> Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 12:15 PM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
> Subject
Thanks for having a look. Inline...
On Oct 3, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Not sure what is a “basic zone no security groups”.
Basic Zone type with the following Network Offering:
DefaultSharedNetworkOffering as opposed to the default/first option
DefaultSharedNetworkOffering
Any clues in your logs?
After stopping tomcat and CS make sure nothing is listening on 8080 before
attempting to start CS.
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 7:03 AM, mo wrote:
>
> Seems that did not work, still getting 404. :-(
>
>
>
>> On September 11, 2014 at 10:01:28 AM,
Tomcat probably got updated and restarted after the update causing the prob.
Stop tomcat and cloudstack manger then start cloudstack manager again. You
should be all set.
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 6:47 AM, mo wrote:
>
> I am presently getting 404 error when attempting to access the UI. I believe
On Aug 25, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Carlos Reátegui
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure about this ‘fix’. If the goal is to match AWS here is the way it
>> works compared to 4.3.
>>
>>
> The actual fix was just
Not sure about this ‘fix’. If the goal is to match AWS here is the way it
works compared to 4.3.
1) /latest/user-data
On AWS one can query /latest/user-data with or without the trailing slash and
BOTH return the user-data
On ACS 4.3 /latest/user-data works but with trailing / returns a 404.
Did you create a libvirt rpm and install that way?
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:08 PM, Yitao Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi,
> When install cloudstack-agent from my own repos which built from source, it
> failed
>
> [root@devstack ~]# rpm -ivh
> http://192.168.129.7/ieureka/cloudstack-agent-4.3.0-1.el6.x86_64.
@arhont.com and delete and
> purge the email and any attachments without making a copy.
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Carlos Reátegui"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, 26 July, 2014 8:16:19 PM
> Subject: Re: VR will not start af
I already destroyed it once and that didn’t do it. I guess I can try again
unless you mean something else.
On Jul 26, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Can you just delete the router and let it create a new one?
> On Jul 26, 2014 12:44 PM, "Carlos Reátegui" wrote:
&
tried using the one from
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/id_rsa.cloud but it did not
work.
thanks,
_Carlos
On Jul 26, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Adding dev list
>
> Thanks Andrei, although not what I wanted to hear.
>
> I decided to try upgr
t you are hereby
> notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
> immediately advise us by return email at and...@arhont.com and delete and
> purge the email and any attachments without
Feeling good about moving my basic network deployment from one subnet to
another, I would now like to move the System VM ip range and expand the guest
VM range.
I had been sharing the previous subnet with others and only had from .150 up
through .249. The new subnet is all mine. As part of th
is derived from the MAC wouldn’t I have encountered
this same problem and not been able to have the new machine connect to the
hosts?
thanks,
Carlos
On Jul 25, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Any thoughts out there?
>
> It keeps trying to connect to the hosts but it is
re-ordered in a random fashion
which is why I could not make sense out of the diff during the install. Not
sure how that happened but my concern mentioned below is probably a non-issue.
regards,
-Carlos
On Jun 30, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> I set encryption to none
On Jul 2, 2014, at 9:31 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> For the xen 5.6, 6.0 and 6.0.2 CSP packages are available.
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/citrix-xenserver-installation.html#xenserver-support-pkg-installation
Yes
On Jul 1, 2014, at 3:25 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Carlos Reátegui wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> When does stuff get copied from [1] to [2] ?
>>
>> I ask because the docs
>> (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-install
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
Hi All,
When does stuff get copied from [1] to [2] ?
I ask because the docs
(http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/installation.html)
say to download vhd-util and place it in [1] however the script that pushes it
to the hosts looks for it in [2].
In my
DEBUG [c.c.u.c.DBEncryptionUtil] (main:null) Error
while decrypting: true
The key is still the default password and I have decrypted all the ENC
parameters from the db.properties file and they seem ok. What am I missing?
thanks,
Carlos
On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote
something the keeps updating the db key and re-ecrypts the host
passwords?
On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am having problems bringing my system back up. I have not checked the
> credentials of my hosts but the upgraded management server is unable to
[c.c.s.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-4:ctx-d66c71fb) AutoScaling Monitor is running...
On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Hi Sudha,
> Thanks for checking in. I was out for the weekend and just getting back to
> this now.
>
> My main question at this point is if it is ok
I am trying out the upgrade instructions from
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
but going to 4.4 built from source today.
My setup: XenServer 6.0.2 Hosts, Management Server on Ubuntu 12.04, Primary and
Secondary on N
On Jun 20, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Carlos Reátegui
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rohit,
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 201
Hi Rohit,
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Carlos Reategui
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rohit,
>> Thanks for the info, but I was asking about the non-oss. Is that included
>> in Wido's released versions?
>>
>
> This is oss (I checked th
:
> Carlos, please export your db and do a test upgrade on a lab machine?
> Now is the time to solve any upgrade issues in 4.4.
>
> Have you tried the 4.3 upgrade already?
>
> regards,
> Daan
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
>> Hi Rohit,
Hi Rohit,
The awsapi was one of the reasons we chose to use ACS. We have developed some
internal tools and apps to manage our deployments on AWS that we want to re-use
on ACS. We have not been able to use it yet because it was broken in 4.1.1.
We tried to upgrade to 4.2 and were unsuccessful
38 matches
Mail list logo