CodeBleu commented on PR #78:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/78#issuecomment-3576953849
> Code looks good. But it doesn't handle when the CIDR list is updated in
the annotation.
This is because that API didn't exist when the PR was first created. -
vishesh92 commented on PR #78:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/78#issuecomment-3576360580
Code looks good. But it doesn't handle when the CIDR list is updated in the
annotation.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
Copilot commented on code in PR #84:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/84#discussion_r2560510005
##
.golangci.yml:
##
@@ -1,53 +1,46 @@
-# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
-# or more contributor license agreements. See
vishesh92 opened a new pull request, #84:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/84
This pull request updates the project's development tooling and
documentation to improve compatibility, maintainability, and developer
experience. The most significant changes are
Copilot commented on code in PR #83:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/83#discussion_r2560173545
##
cloudstack.go:
##
@@ -234,7 +238,14 @@ func (cs *CSCloud) GetZoneByNodeName(ctx context.Context,
nodeName types.NodeNam
klog.V(2).Info
vishesh92 closed issue #80: Need docker image build for arm64 platform
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/80
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
vishesh92 merged PR #81:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/81
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
Copilot commented on code in PR #83:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/83#discussion_r2560016685
##
cloudstack.go:
##
@@ -190,7 +193,12 @@ func (cs *CSCloud) GetZone(ctx context.Context)
(cloudprovider.Zone, error) {
klog.V(2).Infof("
vishesh92 opened a new pull request, #83:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/83
Fixes https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/39
Details
This pull request introduces support for a configurable `region` parameter
in the
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #81:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/81#discussion_r2559854070
##
.github/workflows/build-docker-image.yml:
##
@@ -57,8 +50,41 @@ jobs:
- name: Set Docker image FULL TAG
run: echo "FULL_TAG=$(i
vishesh92 commented on code in PR #81:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/81#discussion_r2559853290
##
.github/workflows/build-docker-image.yml:
##
@@ -34,16 +34,9 @@ concurrency:
jobs:
build:
-if: github.repository == 'apache/cloudstac
Copilot commented on code in PR #82:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/82#discussion_r2559828323
##
cloudstack_loadbalancer.go:
##
@@ -127,6 +133,14 @@ func (cs *CSCloud) EnsureLoadBalancer(ctx context.Context,
clusterName string, s
vishesh92 opened a new pull request, #82:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/82
Fixes https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/51
Details
This pull request introduces enhancements to the CloudStack cloud provider
for Ku
Pearl1594 commented on code in PR #81:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/81#discussion_r2559799599
##
.github/workflows/build-docker-image.yml:
##
@@ -34,16 +34,9 @@ concurrency:
jobs:
build:
-if: github.repository == 'apache/cloudstac
+1 should we able to remove this. This does not need deprecation as this was an
unfinished GSoC student project which was never claimed to be
shipped/used/released.
Regards.
From: João Jandre Paraquetti
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 17:27
To: dev@cloudstack
+1 the old / .net-C# one was broadly supported for a limited time and didn't
get much maintenance over the years.
Now that the Hyper-V extension is here, we should be safely able to retire the
java-based plugin.
Regards.
From: Vishesh Jindal
Sent: Tuesday, No
+1 we should be able to deprecate them and eventually remove them. Many
storage/hypervisor/network plugins were created as PoC and were only broadly
supported without much depth. UCS was one of them, and it's likely it does not
work and the s/w - h/w stack is deprecated / vendor EOL'd. We should
Congratulations Vishesh - well deserved!
Regards.
From: Vishesh
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 11:32
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: New PMC member: Vishesh Jindal
Thank you everyone!
Regards
Vishesh
On Fri, Nov
+1 to deprecate and remove the codebase
OVM/OVM3 was quickly killed off as products, we can be certain nobody is using
them and they aren't been maintained for years now.
Regards.
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 12:44
To: dev
Cc: PMC ; us
19 matches
Mail list logo
