Re: [VOTE] Versioning process

2025-05-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
May I propose we hold the vote, this has three different topics being considered which looks like still need to be discussed. Also we cannot vote on some of the things whose details are yet to be completed defined and proposed. Regards. From: João Jandre Sent:

Re: [Discussion] Versioning

2025-05-08 Thread João Jandre
Hello, Rohit I'm very sorry to hear that your country is at war. Do you think that if we extend the voting to a full week, you can participate? Regarding your comments: 1. Semver is very specific on how the version naming should be; it should only contain three version numbers, not four. Fur

Re: [VOTE] Versioning process

2025-05-08 Thread João Jandre
Hi Daan, Regarding your first point, adding default values to the DB is different from changing the DB schema. Changing the DB schema would be creating/removing tables or creating/removing columns. Thus, adding new values to tables would not be an issue. Would you like me to add this definiti

Re: [PR] Update KVM incremental snapshot version [cloudstack-documentation]

2025-05-08 Thread via GitHub
blueorangutan commented on PR #488: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/488#issuecomment-2863753198 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/488. (QA-JID 333) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [PR] Update KVM incremental snapshot version [cloudstack-documentation]

2025-05-08 Thread via GitHub
blueorangutan commented on PR #488: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/488#issuecomment-2863751226 @sureshanaparti a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git S

Re: [PR] Update KVM incremental snapshot version [cloudstack-documentation]

2025-05-08 Thread via GitHub
sureshanaparti commented on PR #488: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/488#issuecomment-2863747549 @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

Re: [Discussion] Versioning

2025-05-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
Sorry all - I'm busy at work but want to chime in after considering the thread (plus my country's at war atm). I need more time and I wouldn't be able to vote within 72 hrs. On the face value - none of the three things needs voting on, we already use the semver & have used deprecation process f

Re: [VOTE] Versioning process

2025-05-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
João, I am completely +1 on item 3. I am missing the exceptions that we need on both other issues. - for DB we add hypervisor types in minor versions and those need DB changes - for both DB and API changes we make exceptions for security releases given a rewording to include those, I would be compl