Re: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC networks

2024-05-20 Thread Dietrich, Alex
Hello Alex, I appreciate this back and forth as I am excited about the potential this feature would hold. * This is a very valid point. We could add network specific BGP peers as well, which would override the automatic AS allocation, in the same way that we now allocate DNS servers in t

Re: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC networks

2024-05-20 Thread Dietrich, Alex
Hi Alex, This may be a difference in perspective in implementation of BGP at the tenant level. I see the ability this would provide to seamlessly establishing those peering relationships with minimal intervention (helping scalability). I think adding the ability to add network specific peers as

Re: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC networks

2024-05-20 Thread Wido den Hollander
Op 20/05/2024 om 14:45 schreef Alex Mattioli: Hi Alex, In this scenario: I think adding the ability to add network specific peers as mentioned in one of >your prior replies would still allow the level of control some operators (myself >included) may desire. How do you propose network spe

RE: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC networks

2024-05-20 Thread Alex Mattioli
Hi Alex, In this scenario: >I think adding the ability to add network specific peers as mentioned in one >of >your prior replies would still allow the level of control some operators >(myself >included) may desire. How do you propose network specific peers to be implemented? Regards Alex

RE: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC networks

2024-05-20 Thread Alex Mattioli
Hi Alex, > I am not convinced that specifying BGP peers at the zone level is a good idea > given the impacts BGP can have on a given network. I would much rather see > both peer and AS specification handled at the >network configuration, or > another more specific level. I don't see how else e

RE: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC networks

2024-05-20 Thread Alex Mattioli
Hi Wido, Thanks for the feedback, comments below: > I would suggest that the upstream router (Juniper, Frr, etc) should then use > Dynamic BGP neihbors. That's the plan. > I do suggest we add BGP passwords/encryption from the start for safety > reasons. That's very likely to be there from d

Re: [I] 6.4.0 add host -> authentication error [cloudstack-cloudmonkey]

2024-05-20 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud commented on issue #151: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues/151#issuecomment-2120145537 Fixed by https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/150 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, plea

Re: [I] 6.4.0 add host -> authentication error [cloudstack-cloudmonkey]

2024-05-20 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud closed issue #151: 6.4.0 add host -> authentication error URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues/151 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] network: when using API key & secret key drop params [cloudstack-cloudmonkey]

2024-05-20 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud merged PR #150: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/150 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: [PR] List virtual machines with details=min,nics [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider]

2024-05-20 Thread via GitHub
rohityadavcloud merged PR #60: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/60 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev