happy to discuss further (not agreeing at all with the arguments).
This vote is closed without conclusion.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 5:28 PM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Agree with Daniel, I would prefer to discuss this further too. I think we're
> moving too fast with the voting.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
Agree with Daniel, I would prefer to discuss this further too. I think we're
moving too fast with the voting.
Regards.
From: Guto Veronezi
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 20:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] drop first version number an
Hello guys,
I just replied the discussion thread and I would like to discuss it a
little bit further before voting.
Best regards,
Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
On 1/25/24 11:47, Daan Hoogland wrote:
LS,
As previously discussed [1] there is a growing wish to no longer carry
the version numb
Hello guys,
It is nice that we are discussing this topic; however, what is the
point? Is it just a semantic change? Or we will be able to introduce
changes that cause incompatibility between versions (although some
incompatibilities are already introduced even when they should not)? By
the wa
LS,
As previously discussed [1] there is a growing wish to no longer carry
the version number 4 in future versions. The proposal is to proceed as
usual but just drop the first number. This means the next version will
be called 20.0, in addition to a possible 4.18.2 and/or 4.19.1
+1 for agree
0 fo
DaanHoogland merged PR #376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/376
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #79:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/79#discussion_r1466275228
##
cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_instance.go:
##
@@ -144,7 +144,12 @@ func resourceCloudStackInstance() *schema.Resource {
kiranchavala commented on code in PR #79:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/79#discussion_r1466273040
##
cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_instance.go:
##
@@ -144,7 +144,12 @@ func resourceCloudStackInstance() *schema.Resource {
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #374:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/374#discussion_r1466265836
##
source/adminguide/clusters.rst:
##
@@ -74,6 +74,30 @@ Following are the configuration parameters for DRS.
Very high value for ``drs.max.mi
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #374:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/374#discussion_r1466265505
##
source/adminguide/clusters.rst:
##
@@ -74,6 +74,30 @@ Following are the configuration parameters for DRS.
Very high value for ``drs.max.mi
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #374:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/374#discussion_r1466263602
##
source/adminguide/clusters.rst:
##
@@ -74,6 +74,30 @@ Following are the configuration parameters for DRS.
Very high value for ``drs.max.mi
sureshanaparti commented on code in PR #79:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/79#discussion_r1466261875
##
cloudstack/resource_cloudstack_instance.go:
##
@@ -144,7 +144,12 @@ func resourceCloudStackInstance() *schema.Resource {
vishesh92 commented on PR #374:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/374#issuecomment-1910028475
> @vishesh92 is this for 4.19? or next release?
I was thinking of getting this in 4.19.1.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
DaanHoogland commented on PR #374:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/374#issuecomment-1910017237
@vishesh92 is this for 4.19? or next release?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
14 matches
Mail list logo
