blueorangutan commented on PR #313:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/313#issuecomment-1580002597
QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/313.
(QA-JID 85)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
blueorangutan commented on PR #313:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/313#issuecomment-158384
@vishesh92 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
vishesh92 commented on PR #313:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/313#issuecomment-1579998398
@blueorangutan docbuild
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
lgtm. go ahead Vishesh.
-Wei
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 14:17, Vishesh Jindal
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on upgrading Mockito's version & phasing out powermock. For
> new maven modules, I would request all to use Mockito's mockStatic instead
> of Powermock.
>
> Why?
> Powermock's last releas
Your approach LGTM Vishes, and we need to ensure build stability and smoketests
continue to pass as-is. It would be great if unit tests using powermock runner
are refactored or supported/counted in the codecoverage.
Regards.
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Tuesday,
I like your approach Vishesh +1 from me
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:18 PM Vishesh Jindal
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on upgrading Mockito's version & phasing out powermock. For new
> maven modules, I would request all to use Mockito's mockStatic instead of
> Powermock.
>
> Why?
> Powermock
Hi all,
I am working on upgrading Mockito's version & phasing out powermock. For new
maven modules, I would request all to use Mockito's mockStatic instead of
Powermock.
Why?
Powermock's last release was on Nov 2, 2020. The project seems to have been
abandoned. Powermock has compatibility issu
João,
Technically, for lazy consensus a vote thread needs three +1 (binding) votes
which are only counted towards a decision or approval [1].
Since there are no objections but concerns shared so far, the PR can be
reviewed, tested and merged as any other PR as long as it meets the community
re
Z-eeshan opened a new pull request, #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/62
1. This PR adds vApp Properties field for VMWare related configs and also
nicnetworklist paramters from Cloudstack API
2. Also code on main branch is not compilble due to an extr
Hi,
I would like CloudStack to support Object Storage as a first-class end user
feature. It can be added using plugin framework to support various Object
Storage providers.
CloudStack will manage the lifecycle of ObjectStoragePools and Buckets. Any S3
compliant client should be able to manage th
10 matches
Mail list logo
