[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland merged pull request #292: fix RPM package repository url

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
DaanHoogland merged PR #292: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/292 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #292: fix RPM package repository url

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on PR #292: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/292#issuecomment-1367927106 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/292. (QA-JID 21) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #292: fix RPM package repository url

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on PR #292: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/292#issuecomment-1367926875 @DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland commented on pull request #292: fix RPM package repository url

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
DaanHoogland commented on PR #292: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/292#issuecomment-1367926534 @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go t

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL][4.19] remove juniper plugins F5 and SRX

2022-12-30 Thread Daan Hoogland
The reason I deleted both was because they both depend on the vulnerable jar iControl, for which there is no update. On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:35 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: > I think there are two plugins in question. What you've advised makes sense > for F5, I'm not sure if SRX plugin is already re

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL][4.19] remove juniper plugins F5 and SRX

2022-12-30 Thread Rohit Yadav
I think there are two plugins in question. What you've advised makes sense for F5, I'm not sure if SRX plugin is already removed from the build system. Nevertheless, if there are no objections then you may execute your proposal as the RM. Regards. From: Daan H

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #294: metrics notes

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on PR #294: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/294#issuecomment-1367844193 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/294. (QA-JID 20) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #294: metrics notes

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
blueorangutan commented on PR #294: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/294#issuecomment-1367843940 @shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] shwstppr commented on pull request #294: metrics notes

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
shwstppr commented on PR #294: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/294#issuecomment-1367843539 Thanks @DaanHoogland for pointing it out. Made the changes @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mess