[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] utchoang opened a new pull request #232: ui - Multiple server management documentation

utchoang opened a new pull request #232: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/232 Related https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4885 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

[GitHub] [cloudstack-go] rhtyd merged pull request #1: Update go module path with Apache home

rhtyd merged pull request #1: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/1 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@

[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] rhtyd commented on issue #16: [DISCUSS] Work on next release

rhtyd commented on issue #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-887231506 @davidjumani I've created/pushed latest build to https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags?page=1&ordering=last_updated When you've

[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] rhtyd commented on issue #16: [DISCUSS] Work on next release

rhtyd commented on issue #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-887228952 +1, if @onitake and @joschi36 don't respond, I would say let's do some basic smoke-testing to ensure it is working and cut RC. -- This is an automated message fro

[GitHub] [cloudstack-kubernetes-provider] davidjumani commented on issue #16: [DISCUSS] Work on next release

davidjumani commented on issue #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/issues/16#issuecomment-887220783 Ping @rhtyd @onitake @joschi36 shall I take it as an overwhelmingly yes ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mess

RE: Cloudstack GPU

Thanks Rohit, Those are the articles I'm basing my ideas on as well, looks like the only available alternative is passthrough, with it's limitations. Am wondering if anyone out there is actually running this in production. Cheers, Alex -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: 26

Re: Cloudstack GPU

Hi Alex, I've heard/seen some users using GPUs with XenServer for graphical rendering and I remember somebody discussing about GPU in KVM which is possible by using the extraconfig feature while deploying VM (the only limitation is on KVM you cannot share one GPU across VMs; however if your ser

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware network rate for network and VMs

Hi Vivek, Thank you for your response. I understand the scenarios you have explained but the issue I face right now is that portgroup for user VMs is not updated when network offering (with network rate difference) for that network is changed from ACS. I tried to show that here, https://youtu.be

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware network rate for network and VMs

Hello Abhishek, Everything is useful and it completely depends on your requirements..! * Is having VM-level (using compute offering and global setting for VMs) useful? Having a higher network rate for VMs and a lower network rate for VRs(network) will make it useless. Ans - Yes definitely it

[DISCUSS] VMware network rate for network and VMs

Hi all, I've been working on fixing/refactoring VMware portgroup reconfigure on network offering change, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5181 While working on it I found different portgroups on the same VLAN can be used based on the different network rates used in the network offering