+1
I think that since Cenots8 / Rocky / Alma are binary compatible it would be
sufficient to support Rocky since it is looking like the go to alternative, and
supporting any one would pretty much be supporting the other
About dropping support, I'm for supporting it until EOL this year
___
I’m also not sure how CloudStack’s CI/CD setup works and how easy/complicated
it may be to run a full build on Rocky. But we could always run a build of the
4.15.0 release on a standalone Rocky server - planning to do that in the next
couple of days, once I build a Rocky template on our test inf
All,
Since CentOS8 (not stream) is officially EOL at the end of this
year, I'd say keep supporting it until then, but don't support it past
then. This may be a good 6-month transition to support
Rocky/Alma/Springdale/whatever. Realistically, I'd be surprised if one
of those worked and one didn'
Outraged as I was initially, having thought more about CentOS Stream now
that the dust has settled imho it should continue to be supported as
first class platform.
For most/many intents and purposes it'll be RHEL, only supported for 5
years.
I think it's going to be as good or better (considerin
Both I guess, 8-Stream may not same kind of stability like an LTS release.
Regards.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
From: n...@li.nux.ro
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 8:11:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Rocky 8.4
Hi,
Drop support for CentOS8, 8-Stream or both?
Regards
On 2021-06-22 08:41, Rohit Yadav wrote:
All,
With GA release of Rocky Linux 8.4
(https://docs.rockylinux.org/release_notes/8.4) does it make sense now
to completely drop support for CentOS8 in the next major release? I
did a quick test a
Spaceman1984 opened a new pull request #223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/223
Added some documentation around Host HA and management-server internal load
balancing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, plea
+1. We were planning to run a few experiments with Rocky on ACS 4.15 sometime
this week, across VMware, Xen and KVM to make sure there are no kinks around
RPM packages, cloud-init and so on. Will message on this thread if something
does come up.
Best!
Rudraksh Mukta Kulshreshtha
Vice-Presiden
davidjumani commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/pull/32#issuecomment-865517226
@rhtyd @joschi36 Can this be merged after 1.0 is released? Since there only
exist isos for 1.16. Post release isos for 1.18, 1.20 can be created and teste
All,
With GA release of Rocky Linux 8.4
(https://docs.rockylinux.org/release_notes/8.4) does it make sense now to
completely drop support for CentOS8 in the next major release? I did a quick
test and it seems rpms built on centos8 container continue to work on Rocky
release. Thoughts?
Regards
Thanks for the update and testing it out. It may be my browser/issue only.
I have 3 physical networks and for whatever reason only 1 of them didn’t save.
Even going next and previous in the wizard it would show sometimes and others
not show. Its not a show stopper since I know what to look fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
