Re: [DISCUSS] [IMPORTANT] CloudStack 4.14 release WITH updated UI

All, I discussed the issue with few colleagues and came with the following commentary and proposal with their inputs: Problems with the current setup observed over last year: * Two different Github repositories (apache/cloudstack and apache/cloudstack-primate) with their own issue tracking

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] DaanHoogland opened a new issue #889: [BUG] OS type combo box is not reponding

DaanHoogland opened a new issue #889: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/889 **Describe the bug** When registering a template, after going through the motion up to selecting the os type, during selction of the template os nothing happens. typing a partial name do

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] slavkap opened a new issue #888: Question - How to create primary storage with SharedMountPoint

slavkap opened a new issue #888: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/888 Hi all, I'm trying to create primary storage with SharedMountPoint but the command fails because "server" has to be provided (but there isn't such field) ![image](https://user-images

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] GabrielBrascher commented on pull request #863: [UI] Allow VM Snapshot for stopped VM on KVM hypervisor and PowerFlex/ScaleIO storage pool

GabrielBrascher commented on pull request #863: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/863#issuecomment-738801874 @sureshanaparti is this ready to review/test? This is an automated message from the Apache Git

RE: [DISCUSS]/[PROPOSAL] draft PRs

+1 I've also created a script that trawls our PRs to both label and create a report. Right now it uses the Draft 'type' to figure out what's 'coming soon'. Ps. Once polished I plan to contribute the docker containers that takes away all 'environment creation' hassles. paul.an...@shapeblue.com

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland commented on pull request #132: cloud-init and UserData service documentation cleanup

DaanHoogland commented on pull request #132: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/132#issuecomment-738775203 @onitake can you address the conflict and the comments? This is an automated message from t

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] PaulAngus merged pull request #885: createnetworkform: Displaying api errors

PaulAngus merged pull request #885: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/885 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL abov

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] PaulAngus commented on pull request #885: createnetworkform: Displaying api errors

PaulAngus commented on pull request #885: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/885#issuecomment-738752315 +1, reverting back to the old user experience is definitely better than the new UX. Ideally, we'd find a way such that the admin can't get CloudStack networkin

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #887: compute: startVirtualMachine - Fetching pods, clusters && hosts from the vm's zone

blueorangutan commented on pull request #887: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/887#issuecomment-738750540 Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian :heavy_check_mark:archive. QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/887 (JID-3

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] blueorangutan commented on pull request #887: compute: startVirtualMachine - Fetching pods, clusters && hosts from the vm's zone

blueorangutan commented on pull request #887: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/887#issuecomment-738746547 @davidjumani a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani commented on pull request #887: compute: startVirtualMachine - Fetching pods, clusters && hosts from the vm's zone

davidjumani commented on pull request #887: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/887#issuecomment-738746196 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [DISCUSS] [IMPORTANT] CloudStack 4.14 release WITH updated UI

I agree to it. Having one package which deploys both backend and frontend is better Sent from my iPhone > On 03-Dec-2020, at 7:09 PM, pau...@apache.org wrote: > > PMC members, PLEASE ONLY RESPOND ON THE DEV THREAD. > > > > Hi all, > > > > Please read all of this, I know it's a bit wordy.

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd merged pull request #886: Disable edit and delete of UI read-only settings

rhtyd merged pull request #886: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/886 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd merged pull request #880: Close snapshot form in case of an error

rhtyd merged pull request #880: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/880 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: [DISCUSS] [IMPORTANT] CloudStack 4.14 release WITH updated UI

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 7:09 PM wrote: > > Hi all, > [ snip ] > > 1. I think that the repo 'apache/cloudstack-primate' should be renamed to > '/apache/cloudstack-ui', to keep everything just 'cloudstack'. No big opinion here. 'cloudstack-ui' makes it a bit clearer what it is/does > 2. In the repo