Re: Heads-up - Debian 10 Systemvmtemplate

2020-06-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
Typo - "the 4.14 Debian 10 systemvmtemplate will", was supposed to be "the 4.14 Debian 9 systemvmtemplate may". Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue https://www.shapeblue.com From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 08:50 To: dev@cloudstac

Heads-up - Debian 10 Systemvmtemplate

2020-06-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, Debian 9 (https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases#Production_Releases) EOL date is in July 2020 (while the LTS EOL date is still far away in 2022 for security updates). We've moved to a Debian 10 based systemvmtemplate on master/4.15-snapshot now which will contain python3 (python2 still d

Re: apidocs build failure

2020-06-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Sina, Are you seeing this on latest master? You can debug what's causing failure by either running the mvn command for -pl tools/apidocs, or run the command manually: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/tools/apidoc/pom.xml#L63 It could a jdk/java issue, you may install jenv and

Re: Managed Storage and HA

2020-06-08 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
I am thinking you would make the ListVolumeStats API call to the SF cluster from a management server because we know that management servers should have access to the management network of the SF cluster. I know some KVM hosts might have access to the management network of the SF cluster that su

Re: Managed Storage and HA

2020-06-08 Thread Sven Vogel
Hi Paul, Hi Mike, Hi Syed, @Paul > Doesn’t the same problem exist with that? If the agent dies, then the fake > volume will stop being updated but the VMs would still be running. Do you mean we don’t know if a machine is running and get an false positive? I think about if we had only one fake

apidocs build failure

2020-06-08 Thread Sina Kashipazha
Hi, I have trouble building apidocs on mac (see below). Any idea? Kind Regards, Sina [INFO] Apache CloudStack apidocs .. FAILURE [ 31.185 s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack marvin ... SKIPPED [INFO] Apache CloudStack DevCloud4 SKI

Re: [DISCUSS] New default template

2020-06-08 Thread Sven Vogel
My small additions. I would go with an LTS version. For me it would be CentOS 8 minimal. I agree with Paul sometimes the upstream repo are gone or in archive state and its not for production use. Maybe we can put one of them to „our“ Cloudstack repo. If we use Ubuntu or CentOS is not so import

Re: [DISCUSS] New default template

2020-06-08 Thread Andrija Panic
I agree with Paul - a single, well-configured one. (Considering the Marvin tests are run using the current default template, I think it might make sense to consider CentOS 7/8, bug again, just my opinion) On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 16:22, Paul Angus wrote: > My 2 cents: > > The default template is n

Re: Managed Storage and HA

2020-06-08 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Since you know which (SolidFire) volumes are connected to a particular KVM host, I would think you could just use the ListVolumeStats API (described below) from a management server to determine if there is disk activity to any of those volumes. On 6/8/20, 10:32 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: Ne

Re: Managed Storage and HA

2020-06-08 Thread Syed Ahmed
Yeah that's true. I wonder if we could get iscsi information from the Solidfire API that way the agent is just responsible for the iscsi login of the fake volume and then we just monitor the API for connect time On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:17 PM Paul Angus wrote: > Doesn’t the same problem exist w

RE: Managed Storage and HA

2020-06-08 Thread Paul Angus
Doesn’t the same problem exist with that? If the agent dies, then the fake volume will stop being updated but the VMs would still be running. paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK @shapeblue -Original Message--

Re: Managed Storage and HA

2020-06-08 Thread Syed Ahmed
My suggestion would be to use a "fake" volume for each host and use that to check the activity of a host. The volume can be updated by the agent periodically and then we can use the above API from the management server to query the volume activity. On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:18 PM Tutkowski, Mike w

RE: [DISCUSS] New default template

2020-06-08 Thread Paul Angus
My 2 cents: The default template is not there for general or even production use, it’s there for people to 'kick the tires' and either see if CloudStack is what they want or check that their installation is generally OK. Therefore (IMO) the pre-requisites are: - small download size - compatibi

[DISCUSS] Dev and Users participation for Primate GA

2020-06-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, Primate Tech Preview is out [1] with the 4.14.0.0 release, and following our agreement and vote [2][3] we need to work towards GA with 4.15 (next major release). With this thread, I want to kick start a discussion and welcome your feedback on how our community can work towards the GA. On

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] davidjumani opened a new pull request #407: Adding API messages

2020-06-08 Thread GitBox
davidjumani opened a new pull request #407: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/407 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] utchoang commented on pull request #401: [FIX] New Instance dialog

2020-06-08 Thread GitBox
utchoang commented on pull request #401: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/401#issuecomment-640477781 @rhtyd cc @svenvogel I've completed. Please review and testing. Thanks. This is an automated message

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] utchoang commented on pull request #401: [FIX] New Instance dialog

2020-06-08 Thread GitBox
utchoang commented on pull request #401: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/401#issuecomment-640477013 * Add scroller in VM info ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13766648/84013014-918db200-a9a2-11ea-88a3-da51b9d247d9.png) * Add "Default" option i