Fair enough. I modified our Jenkins job to differentiate between versions.
I might open a PR to emphasis this in README, to prevent further confusion.
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Khosrow,
>
>
> Your argument about the ability to have a given name be used as
HI Again Simon,
thanks for these, we also had something commited (actually the whole RBD
snap deletion logic on CEPH side, which was initially missing):
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1230/commits and some stuff were
also handled here.
But what we have here, is, afaik a new case, where
Also these -
https://github.com/myENA/cloudstack/pull/20/commits/1948ce5d24b87433ae9e8f4faebdfc20b56b751a
https://github.com/myENA/cloudstack/pull/12/commits
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 5:23 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: HA issues
Hi Simo
Hi Simon,
a big thank you for this, will have our devs check this!
Thanks!
On 19 February 2018 at 09:02, Simon Weller wrote:
> Andrija,
>
>
> We pushed quite a few PRs on the exception and lockup issues related to
> Ceph in the agent.
>
>
> We have a PR for the deletion issue. See if you have
Khosrow,
Your argument about the ability to have a given name be used as the final
artifact name is not correct for prior 4.11 versions, as that only was a
specific case/condition for systemvm template to copy/rename and then use an
existing definition, and not with rest of the veewee definiti
Andrija,
We pushed quite a few PRs on the exception and lockup issues related to Ceph in
the agent.
We have a PR for the deletion issue. See if you have it pulled into your
release - https://github.com/myENA/cloudstack/pull/9
- Si
From: Andrija Panic
Se
