Sound good for me too
On 21/11/2017 11:04, Rene Moser wrote:
Hi all
The current LTS release is 4.9 which is EOL in June 2018 according to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
AFAIK there are no works planed for a new LTS. The release pace has
slown down (the high pace an
Please review the PR.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2334
-Jayapal
On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Jayapal - nice, can you send a PR please?
- Rohit
From: Jayapal Uradi
mailto:jayapal.ur...@accele
Hi Lucian,
Try the the following in config, ‘-‘ instead of ‘;’ after the aes256 in the
config.
New: "sha1-aes256-modp3072”
Old: "sha1-aes256;modp3072”
Thanks,
Jayapal
On Nov 22, 2017, at 5:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion
mailto:pd...@cloudops.com>> wrote:
Hi Nux,
Could it be your cloudstack version ?
Hi Nux,
Could it be your cloudstack version ? modp3072 is recent I think in
CloudStack so if you run a older version maybe it's not there?
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Thanks Chiradeep,
>
> Checked but brain says no. What should I have learned from there?
>
> AFAIK this is
Thanks Chiradeep,
Checked but brain says no. What should I have learned from there?
AFAIK this is a terraform fail.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Chiradeep Vittal"
> To: "dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 November,
Check
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/77864992fe8f80dbabd1240f6373d2ba3e98713c/utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java#L1221
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying out terraform and had success so far, except for the vpn
> customer gateway feat
Hi,
I'm trying out terraform and had success so far, except for the vpn customer
gateway feature.
For some reason, terraform fails to create it, though I use the same options as
in UI/cloudmonkey where it works just fine.
The snippet for it is:
resource "cloudstack_vpn_customer_gateway" "defau
Hi Rohit
First, thank you very much for the effort!
On 11/21/2017 01:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Please advise if you can collaborate with me on this, especially around
> testing. Thanks!
I have some 2 "nice to have"s, AFAICS these haven't been addressed yet:
- SNMP readonly listen on "linklo
Hello, it sounds very reasonable. The more lifecycle information the better
for adopters.
21 нояб. 2017 г. 8:56 ПП пользователь "Marc-Aurèle Brothier - Exoscale" <
ma...@exoscale.ch> написал:
> It makes more sense to me too.
>
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 12:04 +0100, Rene Moser wrote:
> > Hi all
>
It makes more sense to me too.
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 12:04 +0100, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The current LTS release is 4.9 which is EOL in June 2018 according to
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
>
> AFAIK there are no works planed for a new LTS. The release pace
Jayapal - nice, can you send a PR please?
- Rohit
From: Jayapal Uradi
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 5:33:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: egress fw problems in 4.10?
Hi,
When there is 0.0.0.0/0 for dest cidr, while adding iptables do not inc
All,
I wanted to revive this thread and bring recent progress to your attention:
- We're now able to build debian9 based systemvmtemplates successfully that
work okay-ish as CPVM/SSVM host and some initial networking support (dns, dhcp,
basic zone, advanced zone: firewall, pf, snat etc.) for
Hi,
When there is 0.0.0.0/0 for dest cidr, while adding iptables do not include '
-m set --match-set destCidrIpset-4 dst’ .
For 0.0.0.0/0 no need to add this in ipset.
This should be fixed in VR code.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Jayapal - I tried
Jayapal - I tried that, that leaves the ipset empty and egress traffic does not
work for guest VMs.
This is seen in iptables (filter):
[..snipped..]
-A FW_EGRESS_RULES -m set --match-set destCidrIpset-4 dst -j ACCEPT
-A FW_EGRESS_RULES -j DROP
[..snipped..]
And no members are seen:
root@r-4
When there is 0.0.0.0/0 for dest cidr do not add/skip the ipset match option in
iptables. This will fix the issue.
-Jayapal
On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Hi Lucian,
It looks like a legit bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12
Hi Lucian,
It looks like a legit bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297092
When you add 0.0.0.0/0 as destination cidr, this execute on VR and fails:
# ipset add destCidrIpset-4 1.0.0.0/0
ipset v6.30: The value of the CIDR parameter of the IP address is invalid
The workaround a
Hi all
The current LTS release is 4.9 which is EOL in June 2018 according to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
AFAIK there are no works planed for a new LTS. The release pace has
slown down (the high pace and leaving users behind fixes was the reason
for the LTS).
I am s
I should say that I'm using a cluster of MariaDB on Galera with 3
nodes. All of them are master but I'm using one node at a time by
assign a virtual IP to it.
Here is db.properties on node1:
# management server clustering parameters, change cluster.node.IP to
the machine IP address
# in which the
Rohit,
I see it accepts 0.0.0.0/0 on the source CIDR, but then transforms that into
10.1.1.0/24 (or whatever), I'd imagine it could do the same with the
destination CIDR and just "rename" 0.0.0.0/0 into 0.0.0.0/1.
However this is not a Cloudstack problem as I see it, it's an ipset
bug/feature,
I hit the same issue with the debian9-systemvmtemplate PR. Earlier, the egress
traffic option used to accept 0.0.0.0/0.
- Rohit
From: Nux!
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 11:09:26 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: egress fw problems in 4.10?
Thanks Jayapal,
Indeed, I c
Alireza,
Can you share your db.properties file (you may replace password/ips with dummy
ones)?
- Rohit
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 2:32:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No database selected for the transaction
Also
Also, have seen that with 4.10 with two management servers on one of them.
21 нояб. 2017 г. 3:36 ПП пользователь "Alireza Eskandari" <
astro.alir...@gmail.com> написал:
> Hi all,
> I'm using a cluster of CS 4.9.3 with 2 nodes.
> After couple of weeks, I get "No database selected for the
> transac
Hi all,
I'm using a cluster of CS 4.9.3 with 2 nodes.
After couple of weeks, I get "No database selected for the
transaction" error in logs and I have to restart the CS services to
resolve the issue.
Could you help me about it?
Here is the logs:
2017-11-21 10:37:35,641 WARN [c.c.c.d.ManagementSe
23 matches
Mail list logo
