Re: [DISCUSS][SECURITY] Feature: Secure CloudStack Communications

2017-08-23 Thread ilya
Awesome work - thank you Rohit. On 8/23/17 12:49 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > No regression is seen in the smoke test run, however, I'll leave the PR open > for some time to gather further feedback and reviews. > > > - Rohit > > > From: Rohit Yadav >

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-08-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, Based on last Trilian based test runs, no regressions are seen. We'll aim for following changes and afterwards works towards merging the PR; - An option to provide explicit webapp directory, for custom UI etc. The default UI would be bundled in the fat jar, with the UI assets/files also

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

2017-08-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, Over the past couple of weeks, we've reviewed, tested and merge several PRs. In the recent Trillian test run against latest 4.9 branch, against KVM, VMware and XenServer all smoke tests passed except for rVR and rVPC related failures which are same as the failures in 4.9.2.0. The most com

Re: [DISCUSS][SECURITY] Feature: Secure CloudStack Communications

2017-08-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, No regression is seen in the smoke test run, however, I'll leave the PR open for some time to gather further feedback and reviews. - Rohit From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:09:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][SEC