Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899
@SudharmaJain its taken care
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/921
unable to reproduce in ACS environment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883
Tested the PUll Request.
Logs are rotated as expected in /var/log/cloud folder
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
Wonderful. Seeing green travis after a long time :) ð
Thanks @nvazquez and @SudharmaJain
merging now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
LGTM for the code changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1756
Tested the scenario, xen tools version is visible
---
If
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
Trillian test result (tid-970)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 49701 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
OK. Will have to test again. Maybe there was another change since I last
tested.
On Mar 30, 2017 8:59 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy"
wrote:
> It still works in our environment with 7.3 and biosdevname=0.
>
> [root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Ma
It still works in our environment with 7.3 and biosdevname=0.
[root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Maipo)
[root@ecs-b9a4b830 ~]# ifconfig |grep eth
eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
ether 1e:00:34:00:07:ce txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
This does not work anymore after 7.3 because it gets overridden by this
'fix'. I tried all of the previously working techniques before finally
having to modify the hard coded naming in the file I mentioned previously.
On Mar 30, 2017 8:42 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy"
wrote:
> There is another fix.
There is another fix. Adding this line to grub.conf as boot argument
biosdevname=0
will make all network device names reverted back to ethX
We set this for all our templates right when we started supporting RHEL/CentOS
7 and had no issues so far.
Thanks,
Sergey
Yes. Centos 7 changed the name of the interface. There were ways to change
it prior to 7.3:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/205010/centos-7-rename-network-interface-without-rebooting
As of 7.3, the details in that thread do not work (unless you see my
comment). This is because of this:
ht
I tried the one you provided however, it still has the same problem
... DHCP doesn't seem to pick up. I also see that the interface is not
named eth0 .. could this be the problem? I can try changing the
network driver and see if that helps. Will report back.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Nux!
Hi, I am working on a new set of templates, you can try this one:
http://jenkins.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/x86_64/centos-7-vmware.ova
If still no luck, happy to debug if you can provide me an account. The only
templates I (can) test are the KVM ones.
The official templates from various distros
osboxes also only has VMDK and not OVA. Cloudstack currently only
supports OVA for VMWare
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately.
> I found something on osboxes. I am trying that.
>
> http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C
The official CentOS site does not build OVA for VMWare unfortunately.
I found something on osboxes. I am trying that.
http://pasteboard.co/PNdpMkn1C.png is the screenshot of the error btw
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> I thought the centos images from the official site did
I thought the centos images from the official site did not have the
cloudstack datasource. I'll try and report!
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build
> cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.
>
>
> On Mar 3
Hi Syed, have you tried coud images from centos site, i think centos build
cloudimage as canonical for ubuntu.
On Mar 30, 2017 5:24 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner"
wrote:
> Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
>
> > FYI I'm attaching the sc
Attachments are not forwarded with emails.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
FYI I'm attaching the screenshot of the cloud-init error
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
> somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
> default template which is bundled with
Hi All,
I'm trying to run a CentOS 7 template on VMWare and ACS 4.9 but
somehow cloud-init doesn't seem to pick up the IP form the VR. The
default template which is bundled with ACS (CentOS 5) works.
I got the CentOS7 template from
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/CentOS-7-x
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-607
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
Trillian test result (tid-968)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32527 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
LGTM on the code review. @borisstoyanov @rhtyd Can you kick off tests for
this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
@karuturi sure, done! I rebased master and pushed, now Travis passes!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Thanks for you reply, Rajani, you are doging good job !
在2017年03月30 22时15分, "Rajani Karuturi"写道:
We do that until rc1 is created. After that it's mostly blockers. If there
is less gap between RC and release, that would solve it. But unfortunately,
we have very few people who test/vote on a
We can wait. When do you expect the pr to be out?
~Rajani
Sent from phone.
On 30 Mar 2017 6:50 p.m., "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
> We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?
>
We do that until rc1 is created. After that it's mostly blockers. If there
is less gap between RC and release, that would solve it. But unfortunately,
we have very few people who test/vote on a release and taking more and more
fixes after RC delays it even more if the merged fixes uncover more
bloc
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@priyankparihar Fortunately those API are already written. As per PR1767
you can get VM details including rootdiskcontroller using listVirtualMachines
API and listTemplates.
So if we are talk
There are still 2-3 blockers reported I think according to this mail thread.
Personally I would suggest 'leap frogging tactics' that we put bug fix and
features as many as possible in 4.10.x as long as they meet criterias. It would
give commutity who would like to embrace and try the 'new thing
Hello,
Would it worth to wait few days for the next 4.10 RC if it's not too late?
We might have a PR to support XenServer 7.1 it's under test at the moment ?
Thanks,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect t
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
@karuturi I think it is easiest to just reapply and not search for the
cause of an 8 month old PR resulting in conflicts. (if the original code has
the right URLS in it)
---
If your proje
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022#discussion_r108918688
--- Diff:
vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HypervisorHostHelper.java ---
@@ -1477,6 +1493,40 @@ public static String
resolveHostName
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
code LGTM. Need to check why xenserver and KVM still have wrong urls on PR
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582#issuecomment-288310796
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
I requested @sateesh-chodapuneedi for a review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
This may be seen as a blocker for vmware dv-switch based environments where
at the moment we cannot use the systemvmtemplates.
Pinging for review - @DaanHoogland @abhinandanprateek @borisstoyan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-606
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Cannot revert that pr(1982) because it did everything with respect to
master and it's working fine on master.
This pr(1582) was created on a previous state of master and needs to be
checked why they cannot co exist.
~Rajani
Sent from phone.
On 30 Mar 2017 3:55 p.m., "Daan Hoogland"
wrote:
Raj
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883
@jayakarteek Thanks for testing. I have made the respective code changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
Hi,
I'll remove the NICs. Thanks for the notification.
I assume I'll have to do the same for all my templates as I am using the
same script to generate the ova.
---
If your project i
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
LGTM
@kishankavala did you check what went wrong with the kvm template.
@karuturi reported that and it was probably some auto-conflict-resolution.
---
If your project is set up for it,
GitHub user kishankavala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023
BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-9808 Added system Vm upgrade path for LXC and OVM
`mysql> select id,unique_name,name,type,url,updated,created from
vm_template where type='SYSTEM';
++--
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/883
Test results;
when I executed the setupxenserver.sh file , following is the output
iptables: Bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?).
mv: invalid option -- n
Try `m
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
LGTM on the code changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
@serg38
Added changes for failure case. If migration fails the old pod id will be
restored.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
>I'm happy that you agree with my comments, as far as resizing root disk
for runnign VM, I think checking both full.clone and root.disk.controller
global settings puts us in a good positi
Mike, can you confirm that this is not also an issue in 4.9?
On 30/03/17 08:21, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
This one may be a blocker (it’s currently marked as such):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
It would be nice if one of our VMware gurus could take a
Rajani, will you revert the PR that does the SVM upgrades now?
On 30/03/17 10:13, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
Hi @borisstoyanov,
>Here are some recommendations that would make user experience better. What
I'm suggesting is to implement 2 standalone checks.
Check if vmware.create.full.clone
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2012
LGTM for the code changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899
@yvsubhash your template related changes are not relevant to the issue
fixed. Please remove the changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-605
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@NuxRo hi Lucian, I tested your Macchinina template as well:
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/macchinina-vmware.ova It too
has network/nics defined so it fails to deploy on dvswitc
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
@nvazquez PR #2019 is merged. Can you force push and kick travis again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2019
merging now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
CLOUDSTACK-9591: Fix systemvmtemplate to not include network details
This removes nic/network specific details while exporting the
systemvmtemplate for vmware (ova file). Having this causes the s
Yes and I am not getting time to spend on it. It would be great
if anyone could help(there are more details on the PR)
If blockers are resolved, I will create RC2 on Monday.
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Daan Hoogland
(daan.hoogl...@shapeb
Github user cloudsadhu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r108862410
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py ---
@@ -114,36 +134,46 @@ def test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize(self):
# 2. ro
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-604
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
To be clear; the references to download.cloud.com have been removed. What is
blocking us now is that the update to new system VMs isn’t working properly.
On 30/03/17 08:06, "Haijiao" <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
Seems only one blocker left. Are we close to release the RC2 ?
C
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2021
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
75 matches
Mail list logo
