All,
Using blueorganutan, Rohit, Murali, Boris, Paul, Abhi, and I are executing the
smoke tests for the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches against the following
environments:
* CentOS 7.2 Management Server + VMware 5.5u3 + NFS Primary/Secondary
Storage
* CentOS 7.2 Management Server
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-41
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1644
@jburwell @kiwiflyer @bvbharatk I've gotten this to a place where I'm
feeling more comfortable with how it works, would you all like me to close this
PR, reopen it against 4.9 then?
---
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@wido I misunderstood. I thought was fixing one or more bugs. Given that
it is an enhancement, you are correct that it should only target master. As
soon as we iron the smoke test issues in
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1673
@wido thank you for re-targeting the PR. Do you think running the smoke
tests against one of the hypervisors is sufficient to verify this defect?
Should we update a Marvin test to cover it?
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@rhtyd we have a case where two experienced users (and likely more to come)
have gotten tripped up by this case. Therefore, we need to address it. As I
mentioned previously, the solution to t
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
Trillian test result (tid-82)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 27946 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@mike-tutkowski sounds good. I am putting together a test results email
which should be out shortly. It outlines the issues we have found thus far. As
such, I expect the testing period for th
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@rhtyd 4.8 is still supported. However, support is for bug fixes, and this
change is not a bug fix. 4.9 is an LTS branch which can take changes such as
these. So I am cool with it being 4.9+
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
I am closing this pull request, and pushed the changes as part of PR #1692,
which will cover overall marvin test failures
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user murali-reddy closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@jburwell Yes, the managed-storage tests should be re-executed. I can do
this over the weekend as my CloudStack systems in the lab here are being fully
utilized for the time being with an
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
Trillian test result (tid-79)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30443 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed @mike-tutkowski should the tests be re-executed to make sure
everything is super green?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@borisstoyanov could you please amend the first line of commit 62f4826 to
be : ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@PaulAngus but it's up to the admin and how they want to upgrade/setup a
new mgmt server. Assuming you want to create a new mgmt server for each old
mgmt server, one strategy could be to copy the
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
That isnt correct @bhaisaab. commands.properties can be different on every
mgmt server. Cloudstack would not know which version to use.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
Trillian test result (tid-81)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 25885 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Sounds good, @syed Since what you added is the same as what's currently in
master, it looks like your list of changed files for this PR is down to 35
(only one of which is a Python file,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@jburwell when a fresh mgmt server is deployed for upgrading an existing
CloudStack environment, several files from `/etc/cloudstack/management` are
copied to the new server, especially the `db.pr
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@jburwell As per our maintenance policy we only maintain n, n-1 branches
i.e. master (upcoming 4.10) and 4.9. At no point we had ever maintained three
branches, it's too much overhead. So, which i
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@rhtyd do you think we should include this update in 4.8.2.0 as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
With a manually deployed Trillian environment based on XenServer 6.5sp1, I
was able to register Ubuntu 16.04 and launch a VM. Screenshots attached:
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 26599 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@rhtyd discussing this issue with @paul, there is a scenario where this
wedged condition can occur. If you perform an upgrade by creating a new
management server VM then no commands.properties
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@pdion891 @jburwell as I've already explained, there should be no need to
enable dynamic apichecker if you're upgrading from an older system that has a
commands.properties file. I think the upgrad
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@mike-tutkowski I've added your updated tests and rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-78)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 26135 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1676
@jburwell This is already in master. @nvazquez opened this to target 4.9
and forward merge. It is completely fine for fix to be 4.10 only since it only
affects rather special circumstances.
--
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1673
@jburwell Ah, that went wrong with the rebase. Fixed!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
If it's similar to what happened to me, it's caused by ssl. By default
the SSVM listens on https for template POST's. Also by default it
doesn't have a valid certificate (listening on ip address, without
domain etc). Most browsers disallow posting to insecure url's.
As a workaround, you can go
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
Right, I forgot to mention that. Thanks @pdion891.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
in case of HTTPs issue registering the template
http://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/5ef827605f884961b94881e928e7a250/swill/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-xen.vhd.bz2
can be use.
---
If your p
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
Here is the template (for xen anyway):
https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/5ef827605f884961b94881e928e7a250/swill/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-xen.vhd.bz2
So far I have not been able to get
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@pdion891 based on the behavior reported, I believe we can make this
experience much smoother if not completely consistent. Do you have time to
grab a quick GTM to discuss tomorrow (29 Sept 20
When I just tried a couple days ago it was not working. It looked like an
ssl issue, but I didn't investigate.
On Sep 29, 2016 9:16 AM, "Jeroen Baten" wrote:
>
>
> So, I could upload templates using an url after setting up a webserver.
>
> Am I correct in assuming it is a bug that I can not use
So, I could upload templates using an url after setting up a webserver.
Am I correct in assuming it is a bug that I can not use the webgui to upload a
template?
Using 4.9.0
Jeroen Baten
Specialist ICT
T +31(0)88335 7941
M+31(0)6 4691 4649
[Description: Description: cid:image002.png@01CE9846.E
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1690
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
LGTM. Since basic checks are all green and we've enough votes, I'll merge
this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1690
LGTM. Since it's a translation change, we've enough votes to merge this.
I'll proceed with merging this on master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
Thanks @abhinandanprateek. So I guest it's an LGTM for this PR but it's
not solving the whole issue for CLOUDSTACK-9489 which is configuration
inconsistency between fresh install and upgrade.
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
I've manually kicked a trillian env (tid-84) to get an env against
xenserver 6.5sp1, as soon as it comes up I'll perform the test to launch a
Ubuntu 16.04 VM using templates from
http://dl.openv
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1673
@wido the Travis and Jenkins are failing due a compilation error. It
appears to be that `StringUtils` has not been imported into `StatsCollector`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-40
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@milamberspace I've started a new ticket to track progress on migration of
transifex to json format: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9513
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
Thanks @ustcweizhou I'll fix as suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@rhtyd I think it is not an issue in KVM/LXC.
the guest pv is checked by this line in
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/927
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
With the tests and lgtms, I'll go with merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
I think switching to Transifex's json format should be okay. I don't know the
downside of switching to json format as well, which is why at the moment we can
continue to use the current workflow and format. I would, therefore, avoid
doing too many changes so I'll proceed with merging the PR and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@milamberspace thanks, yes please proceed with changing transifex format
following merge of this PR. I lack experience with Transifex usage, but I can
help with transforming the current messages.p
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/927
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 107
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=101
Failed=2
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder (search
Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@rhtyd Yes LGTM.
Now (and in another PR), I would like work to try to use directly the json
key/value files from Transifex.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
Thanks @milamberspace is that a LGTM?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@rhtyd I've just tests successfully the last version of the PR. Now if the
value isn't translate, the default language is display.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1685
@rhtyd I understand these words: "help", "hello", "thanks", "package",
"test"
Test run usage: test (mgmt server, one of: centos6, centos7, ubuntu)
(hypervisor, one of: kvm-centos6, kvm
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1685
@blueorangutan help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-39
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@ustcweizhou Hi, I think I used your changes here. VMware is sane to
interpret Ubuntu guest vms as either ubuntuGuest or ubuntu64Guest (identifier
used), while to XS and KVM full names are passed
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
Hi @rhtyd there are some typo in my comment, it should be "Ubuntu 16.04"
not "Ubuntu 14.04" in some lines.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
@abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy please review, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
[4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a guest OS
Adds Ubuntu 16.04 as a supported guest os. This allows users to select
the OS when creating a template etc.
SQL queries teste
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-38
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@jburwell @milamberspace with the current changes, no explicit change in
workflow is needed but may be change in future. Since the aim of the PR was to
get rid of jsps, I would like to avoid too m
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1650
LGTM. @abhinandanprateek is the changes okay, or we should refactor move
them to the default test_data file?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
LGTM. Jenkins failure is not caused by change from the PR.
@abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy a second review please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
The previous test run was incorrect, several tests were run from master the
features that don't exist on 4.8.
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
LGTM based on code review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
On investigation, it was found that Trillian was falling back on master
branch's tests which is why the test failures were high. Some of the feature
such as oobm don't exist in 4.8. I've rekicked
GitHub user murali-reddy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1695
CLOUDSTACK-9511: fix test_privategw_acl.py to handle multiple physical
networks
modified script to handle case where there can be multple physical networks
in the zone
ch
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-37
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/928
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 106
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=0
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder (search
91 matches
Mail list logo
