Github user PaulAngus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1683
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user PaulAngus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1652
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
thank you for replying。
But CloudStack4.6 mysql database cloud table configuration has no this name.
mysql> use cloud
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A
Database changed
mysql> select database()
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@pdion891 The root of this issue is that 4.9 uses dynamic api checker,
which by default is not enabled. So even when the login succeed it does not go
anywhere as the access to any api
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@serg38 no problem
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@jburwell @rhtyd Thanks in advance
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@rhytd can you help @serg38 craft a template with KVM installed and the
virsh commands to create a nested VM?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Did a code walk-thru and review with @murali-reddy, LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@jburwell The only BUILTIN Centos template for Vmware is 5.3 that doesn't
have KVM support to my knowledge. Are you proposing to introduce another
BUILTIN template so that it is available for any
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1678
@jburwell there was some issue with jenkins, force pushing PR resolved it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi awaiting feature enhancement to blueorangutan which was delayed
due to an medical emergency. Also, I want to wait to perform further testing
until #1692 is tested and merged as it fi
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@serg38 the goal is not only verify that functionality works now, but in
the future to protect against regressions. My thinking is that we could deploy
a CentOS VM, install KVM, and verify tha
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed #1692 is testing now. It addresses ping test related failures in the
smoke test suite. I am hoping the tests pass, and we can merge it first thing
tomorrow. Once it has, we can rebase
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1693
LGTM on the testing
```
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups for project ... === TestName:
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | Status : SUCCESS ===
test DeployVM in anti-affi
Matthew,
From an Engineers viewpoint and someone who has a production deployment of
CloudStack now offering VPC services to providers, I think the approach of a
plugin is a wise move. As you mentioned, a full blown replacement of the VR,
since it is such a vital piece of ACS, would require ext
Will,
I think that would be very helpful to me at least and for posterity for
sure. I am in the process of rolling out my first production deployment
of Cloudstack so I have been busier than expected (plus I have been
jumping back and forth between different offices). What I intended to
propo
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@milamberspace I agree because it appears to remove the need to maintain
the Python compilation script which reduces complexity and doesn't add any more
build time.
---
If your project is set
Github user milamberspace commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@rhtyd in the normal case, if the key label.affinity.groups doesn't exists,
the default language is display ("Affinity Groups" in this case). The PR is a
regression for this case (vs the c
Yes. That is why I did the vote and release, even though we did not
advertise it, it makes things easier for dev going forward. :)
On Sep 27, 2016 5:05 PM, "John Burwell" wrote:
> Will,
>
> We make a announcement for 4.8.2.0. I just wanted to make sure that there
> was a 4.8.1 since we are work
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-34
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Will,
We make a announcement for 4.8.2.0. I just wanted to make sure that there was
a 4.8.1 since we are working on 4.8.2.0 …
Thanks,
-John
>
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Sep 27, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Will
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@jburwell a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1681
Trillian test result (tid-58)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 33200 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed @jburwell I should be able to run the tests toward the end of the
week or during the weekend. At the moment, my resources in the lab are devoted
to other CloudStack dev activities.
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@jburwell Squashed the commits. You can run the smoke tests on this. This
change is mostly on the managed storage side so running any volume related
tests would be helpful apart from the tests @mik
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed could you please squash your commits? Once that is done, the
following items will be need to be completed:
* [ ] Re-execute functional test since the code has changed since they
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@jburwell I've rebased against the master. The merge should be good now.
I've addressed your comments as well. @mike-tutkowski has ran his tests on this
functionality.
https://github.com/
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@nathanejohnson thank you for your confirmation
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@jburwell that is correct, the lab I tested on is running KVM + ceph.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@nathanejohnson to confirm, the test results in your [26 Aug
comment](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645#issuecomment-242715452)
comment were from a run on KVM + Ceph?
---
If your
Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@jburwell , test results were posted earlier in the thread.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@jburwell Creating Marvin test for this PR will be a huge undertaking. It
would require building and configuring a hypervisor in a deployed VM and then
creating VM in VM. Considering storage, env
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@nathanejohnson @kiwiflyer do you have test results to share for KVM +
Ceph? If not, we need to rollback this PR until we get test confirmation of
the functionality.
---
If your project is s
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs56sp1, centos7
mgmt + vmware55u3, ubuntu mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Looks like the blueorangutan build didn't complete properly. I am
re-kicking it now.
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
There is a different thread (take two) which has the official votes and
such. I did not do an announcement for the release though.
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue, Sep 27
We did have an official release in the sense that it was voted on and
released, but I did not make a big scene about. You guys were working on
4.8.2 and I just wanted to get it released before you guys modified the
branch so the release branching didn't get messed up.
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Develop
Will,
Have we had an official 4.8.1 release?
Thanks,
-John
>
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Aug 15, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> Thanks Milamber. I will add my own vote.
>
> *Will STEVENS*
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@rhtyd @milamberspace I have started a conversation on dev@ to discuss
transitioning to the JSON format. Is acceptable to hold this PR until we come
to consensus on that thread?
---
If your
All,
As part of the effort to remove the requirement for JSPs and streamline the
development process, Milamber has raised the option of replacing the
message*.properties files with a JSON key/value format [1]. As I understand
it, Transifex supports this file format, and it appears that it woul
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1689
@mike-tutkowski excellent -- thanks for adding that configuration bit. I
am LGTM once the Jenkins and Travis complete successfully.
@karuturi @rhtyd are you able to review for a second
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694#discussion_r80714655
--- Diff:
server/test/com/cloud/storage/listener/StoragePoolMonitorTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694#discussion_r80714972
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/listener/StoragePoolMonitor.java ---
@@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ public void processConnect(Host host, StartupCommand
cmd
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1689
@jburwell I just added that to requirements.txt. I also put a link to
solidfire-sdk-python 1.1.0.92 in the description of this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@serg38 I have this PR on a list to re-review. In my view, using a global
setting for this value is whole inappropriate. I have been busy with other
items, and haven't had a chance to get bac
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
Yes LGTM from my side.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-33
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@koushik-das are you LGTM on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@rhtyd can you add the configuration data to blueorangutan for the changes
to `test_ssvm.py`?
@serg38 @nvazquez once my review comments are addressed and blueorganutan
has been updated
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80701705
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80702685
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80704271
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80701833
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80702827
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80701499
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80700964
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r80702139
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -42,12 +43,19 @@
class TestSSVMs(cloudstackTestCase):
def setUp(self):
+ t
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@serg38 giving your explanations I am ok with your proposal. Just one
addendum, I think we should document it as much as possible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@jburwell a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@serg38 @nvazquez I apologize that I am late to the review. I would like
to see a Marvin test added that verifies that nested virtualization works when
the global setting is enabled (i.e. succ
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@rafaelweingartner @rhtyd Do we make any decision on this? The scope of
this PR was very limited initially. It would be much easier if we don't expand
it too far.
---
If your project is set up
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1677
@serg38 I just kicked a smoke test run on VMware. Assuming that passes, it
will be good for 4.9.1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1677
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@jburwell @karuturi @rafaelweingartner Can you check if this PR can be
merged by the upcoming release?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1677
@jburwell It would be nice to include this PR to the upcoming release. Are
there anything else needed ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@rafaelweingartner @jburwell @karuturi Looks like this PR has everything to
get merged. Can we do it by the release freeze?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@abhinandanprateek did you ran a fresh install of 4.9.x or did an upgrade
from example 4.4.4 ?
The way I'm testing is as follow, in case I do something wrong:
1) ``git checkou
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1674
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 104
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=101
Failed=2
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1673
@wido sorry for the delayed response -- I lost track of this browser tab.
The quickest way may be to create a new branch from 4.8, cherry pick this
commit into it, push the new branch, and ope
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1684
@pdion891 I am unable to reproduce the issue. All the authenticators
configured are tried.
I find it strange that there are no logs. Will it be possible to take a
second look. I ne
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
@wido based on that feedback, sounds like a good items to get into 4.8.2.0
and 4.9.1.0. Does changing the base branch for this PR work?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1678
@abhinandanprateek it appears that there is a Findbugs issue that needs to
be addressed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1686
@rhtyd @serg38 while I agree that this change makes logical sense, it
breaks the API compatibility which we
[guarantee](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases#Releases-
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1686
@rhytd Current implementation has a bug as well that returns GuestOsId in
place of GuestOsTypeId. I am for not only switching to UUID but also for fixing
it and returning correct output.
---
If
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1689
@mike-tutkowski is the SolidFire Python SDK available via pip? If so,
could you please add it to `requirements.txt` in the project root directory?
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-32
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1685
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-31
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1685
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1689
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1685
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1678
I think the build timed out.
> [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.3:findbugs (findbugs) @
cloud-plugin-network-bigswitch ---
> [INFO] Fork Value is true
> Build timed out (af
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan @jburwell any update on the tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
@blueorangutan test centos6 kvm-centos7
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Hi Murali,
Thank you for the quick response.
We will try out your PR, and will keep you updated.
I have couple of questions for you:
Do you know of any other issues in ACS 4.9/master with VMware ?
Is ACS 4.9/master with VMware being supported and qualified by the
community ?
Thanking you in a
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1678
@karuturi Jenkins fail on find-bug: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.codehaus.mojo:findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.3:findbugs (findbugs) on project
cloud-plugin-network-bigswitch: Executio
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-30
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1686
@serg38 I mean the os_type_id, which was previously returned as an integer
but should be returned as a uuid. The uuid would be consumeable by the
listGuestOsMapping API.
---
If your project is s
All,
The listVirtualMachines API response contains a guest os_type_id field which is
an integer, and therefore not useful or easily consumable [1].
All new/modern APIs for example should only return UUIDs for client/users to
consume, returning integers (as in database id) may not be
consumeab
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
CLOUDSTACK-9509: Host Connects Without Storage
KVM hosts on shared storage failure was accepted by mgmt server with the
host state as Up, even though there was no primary/shared storage availa
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
@milamberspace I've fixed the issues that were raised and few other
unescaped characters I found from the generated l10n js files. The
`label.affinity.groups` translation does not exist in korean
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
Thanks @milamberspace I'll fix them, the issues come up due to differences
in how java/jsp urlencoded the translation strings and how the python based
messages.properties->l10n js file converter e
95 matches
Mail list logo
