Hi Will and Team
Can someone point me to upgrade instructions if such exist.
Would like to avoid learning through trial and error if possible.
I will be testing upgrade and functionality of KVM & VMware Advanced
Shared Zones from ACS4.5.2 to latest.
Thanks
ilya
On 7/29/16 11:06 AM, ilya wrote:
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
Thanks @koushik-das!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1619
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1622
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511
Let's have another attempt at this? /cc @karuturi @jburwell @DaanHoogland
@wido @swill @koushik-das @abhinandanprateek and others
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531
systemvmtemplate: fix build and upgrade to debian 7.11 iso
- Bumps base debian iso to version 7.11
- Upgrade ruby version to 2.3.0 (latest/stable)
- Fix Gemfile
- Update README
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531
@karuturi @jburwell this PR has enough review, can we merge this?
The changes are necessary without them the systemvm template appliance
building fails, tested and built these templates:
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1531
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
Pinging for review - @wido @koushik-das @karuturi @abhinandanprateek
@jburwell
This enables `cloudstackAPI` api cmd/resp classes generation against a live
running mgmt server.
---
If your p
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611
Pinging for review - @wido @karuturi @koushik-das @abhinandanprateek
@murali-reddy @jburwell
This is marvin specific change, Travis validation is enough to show that
deployDatacenter wor
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611
marvin: deploy clusters in separate threads
This speeds up cluster deployment by Marvin, each cluster deployment can be
executed in separate threads. This for example, allows for setting up
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
Pinging for review -- @karuturi @koushik-das @abhinandanprateek @jburwell
If we can get this merged soon, all new PRs etc can be tested easily with
CI systems as we'll get the marvin and integ
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620
oobm: simply change password transactional logic
- Simplifies change password transactional logic without using pessmistic
locks
- Adds a re-enter password field in the UI to valid ipmi/oob
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
ouch.. looks like my email client stripped all the new lines.
Re-sending from webmail
Hi All,
These are the proposed dates for 4.10 release (copied from another thread
by John Burwell)
* Development (master open to features and defect fixes): 1 August 2016 -
11 September 2016
* Testing: 12 - 18 Se
> Op 2 augustus 2016 om 4:36 schreef John Burwell :
>
>
> All,
>
> First, thank you to Will for taking on 4.9 and getting it out the door. I
> have updated the proposed release schedule [1] to reflect the release of
> 4.9.0 on 1 August 2016. Please review the release schedule. If you have
A newline or two wouldn't hurt, this is pretty hard to read tbh.
--
Erik
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> Hi All,These are the proposed dates for 4.10 release (copied from
> another thread by John Burwell)* Development (master open to
> features and defect fixes): 1 Aug
Hi All,These are the proposed dates for 4.10 release (copied from
another thread by John Burwell)* Development (master open to
features and defect fixes): 1 August 2016 - 11 September 2016*
Testing: 12 - 18 September 2016* RC Voting: 19 - 25 September
2016* Release: 26 September 2016
master is open
19 matches
Mail list logo
