Dear all,
Is there an alternative solution for now where I can download below URL?
http://download.cloud.com/releases/2.2.0/eec2209b-9875-3c8d-92be-c001bd8a0faf.qcow2.bz2
It's the default CentOS 5.5 (64-bit) no GUI template for KVM. I checked and
the above copy is not yet on cloudstack.apt-get.e
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1546#issuecomment-219203300
@jburwell Thanks, I'll split the changes into separate PR if everyone
demands that. Otherwise each distinct pieces are implemented as separate
commits that can be rev
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1540#issuecomment-219203017
@swill done, closed and reopened to kick CIs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1540
CLOUDSTACK-9377: Fix metrics pagesize issue
Fixes listing of clusters and host to list all clusters/hosts by passing
pagesize=-1.
/cc @koushik-das @swill @DaanHoogland -- fixes the
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1540
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Raja,
I've just picked up on this.
There are a number of URLs which are hardcoded into the CloudStack database for
the small built-in templates. These are in just about every copy of CloudStack
out there.
http://download.cloud.com/templates/builtin/f59f18fb-ae94-4f97-afd2-f84755767aca.vhd.bz2
https://jira.spring.io/browse/SPR-11656
has a pretty good description of spring 3.2.13 support for Java 8
They did add support for Java 8 bytecode.
I am only at 3.2.4 and have no problems but we are pretty explicit about
wiring and do not use autowiring.
In the end, we will all end up moving
All my code is compiled with Java 8.
I have not had any problem since I moved my stuff to Java 8 with Spring
3 but I may just be lucky.
I am not sure how much of a change to code or configurations is required
to upgrade to Spring 4 so it may not be a big deal to do both upgrades
in one rele
Sorry. You misunderstood my comment.
I was noting that users who want to run ACS which requires Java 8 could
also run applications that can not run on Java 8 (although I have never
heard of an application that would not run with the Java 8 JRE) by
running both jre7 and jre8.
Of course once y
Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297#issuecomment-219173152
It still doesn't look. I've tested this in a real setup and it seems to do
what it's supposed to.
Anything I can help with to get past these errors?
---
If
That is helpful, but I need to release an official ACS template with the
release and it needs to be built from the RC candidate, so I need to figure
out the process.
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com
Will,
Rohit has built a new systemvm template that includes strongswan and quagga.
He can point you to images, as well as, help with understanding the
build/release process.
Thanks,
-John
>
Regards,
John Burwell
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden,
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1212#issuecomment-219169448
Ok, what I will do is merge it into 4.6 and forward merge it to 4.7 and
then run CI on it there. I also need to verify what is forward merged from 4.6
because I don'
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1212#issuecomment-219169003
That is fine, I don't mind doing that. Is that the process here? This is
the first time I have handled a 4.6 PR. Will a 4.6 ever be released, or is
that just not i
Ok, thank you John. I need to sort out the process for testing and
releasing a new system VM template. Another thing to do...
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Fri, May 13, 20
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545#issuecomment-219168754
ok, thank you sir. ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545#issuecomment-219168529
@swill I added a small fix for inside the SSVM. During some additional
manual testing I found that the SSVM is picky in the order in the XML
definition.
My se
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#issuecomment-219168493
Please verify why the jobs are failing and re-push this PR to try to get it
green. I need to verify the process to test new system templates and how to
build and dis
Github user syed commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-219166142
@DaanHoogland sure ... doesn't hurt
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
GitHub user syed reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331
Fix Sync of template.properties in Swift
When using Swift as a secondary storage, we create a template.properties
file which stores the metadata about the template. Currently the data which is
Github user syed closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1212#issuecomment-219165095
@swill why not just test against 4.6 and then merge forward? if not, we
need to rebase the branch. Pretty sure @ustcweizhou already did that in-house.
---
If
Will,
1371 includes new Marvin test cases to verify the operation of OSPF. Bobby
Stoyanov will be running these tests, as well as, manual rating of the UI
features added to support it.
Thanks,
-John
>
Regards,
John Burwell
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Cov
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-219163616
@syed can you close and reopen to see if the error is persistent?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Ron,
According to Spring's documentation, Spring 3 only supports running byte code
compiled for 1.7 on a Java8 VM [1]. Spring 4 is the first release to support
byte code compiled to 1.8 running on a Java8 VM.
Our experience with CloudStack 4.5 and master on Java8 has been that it runs,
but
Github user syed commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-219163000
https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/1323/artifact/target/rat.txt
here is the link to the file
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user syed commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-219162095
@swill I got the file from jenkins and it points to
`utils/testsmallfileinactive` ... I have no idea where this file came from
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Ron,
Upon upgrade, we will start using features and runtime classes/methods
introduced with Java8. Therefore, it will become mandatory upgrade from Java7
to Java8 when adopting the release with these changes.
Thanks,
-John
>
Regards,
John Burwell
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.c
> Op 13 mei 2016 om 22:51 schreef John Burwell :
>
>
> All,
>
> Java8 is targeted for post 4.9. Oracle provides an official PPA for Java6,
> Java7, Java8, and Java9 [1] that supports Ubuntu 14.04. It is important to
> bear in mind that Java7 was EOL’ed on April 2015 [2]. In my opinion, the
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#issuecomment-219161020
Then log the warning with just the message and add a debug statement with
the stacktrace. logging stacktraces at a level even more strict then INFO does
not co
Github user syed commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-219160595
@swill looks like jenkins failed because of some licence issue in one
file. I've checked all the files that I have changed and every one seems to
have the correct lic
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219160164
Ok, we need one more review on this.
tag:needsreview tag:needreview
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1495
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1537
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532#issuecomment-219158465
@swill you should always count the opinion of the RM as that of a real
memeber of the community ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1520
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1280
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1376
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Thank you, I added 1376 to my ready to merge list. I have 6 more ready to
merge, so we should be down to 155 tonight...
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219157668
LGTM, tag:easypr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
It would seem that a major version would be appropriate.
I am not sure why someone could not use both Java 8 and Java 7.
I have Java 3 versions 6, 7, and 8 available on my Windows 7 PC.
I would have thought that Linux would be at least that flexible.
Is it really not possible to run Java 8 on U
All,
Java8 is targeted for post 4.9. Oracle provides an official PPA for Java6,
Java7, Java8, and Java9 [1] that supports Ubuntu 14.04. It is important to
bear in mind that Java7 was EOL’ed on April 2015 [2]. In my opinion, the
recent history of Java vulnerabilities dictates that we cannot a
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-219154273
This doesn't seem to be related to this PR.Can you post
managment-server.log extract around the failure time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
It only means that we are dropping support for newer ACS versions.
It most likely won't get into 4.9, which means 14.04 will be supported a
few more weeks/months.
We could mention in the 4.9 RN that for the next release (call it 5.0
because of the change?) will only be supported by $xyz distributi
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545#issuecomment-219152627
@swill Yes, running this in production on our cloud
I just started an Instance and the Agent (backport to 4.8, clean merge)
produced this XML:
```
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-219150983
@syed failed again. :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#issuecomment-219148309
@DaanHoogland in my experience, stack traces are a critical piece of
information for operationally debugging CloudStack. Unfortunately, our logging
lacks the clar
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#issuecomment-219146275
@jburwell @DaanHoogland I have a solution for quickly looking up if a
cluster supports resigning that I think we'll all be happy with.
Upon a host co
- 1376 - master (ready, pending 1515 conflict)
1376 is ready to merge to master branch (Jenkins and Travis are green).
1515 is already merged on 4.8
On 12/05/2016 22:02, Will Stevens wrote:
ACS PRs
- 1537 - master (ready, pending Jenkins)
- 1514 - 4.7 (pending Jenkins)
-
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1280#issuecomment-219141565
I think we are ok on this one. thanks @rhtyd. I will merge this one...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1470#issuecomment-219137807
LGTM based on the manual testing above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1241#issuecomment-219137690
@kansal can you close and reopen for do a force push to try to get Jenkins
green. I am not sure what to do about this PR because I don't know that I have
a way to ve
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1470#issuecomment-219137482
Kill the Master VR:
---
If your project
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1470#issuecomment-219137126
Hot add static route:
--
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-219137064
I have tried to CI this PR a couple times. I get the following during
Deploy DC.
```
Deploy DC Started
Exception Occurred :['Traceback (most rec
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1212#issuecomment-219134524
@rhtyd I can run CI on this, but it is based against 4.6. I am not sure
what to do about that. Should @ustcweizhou at least rebase against 4.7 so we
can get it in a
I am in favor of Java 8, but it means we would drop Ubuntu 14.04 support.
That would make life a bit easier though, since Ubuntu 16.04 has systemd and
14.04 still has sysvinit and that make packaging a problem.
> Op 13 mei 2016 om 19:10 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> All,
>
>
> I've started som
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/956#issuecomment-219130130
@SudharmaJain can you re-push or close and reopen this PR to kick off
Jenkins again?
@rhtyd and @nvazquez I know you both use VMware. I don't have a way to
v
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#issuecomment-219129109
Thanks @anshul1886. Keep in mind that the freeze date for 4.9 is Monday
next week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1503#issuecomment-219126476
I am running my CI against it again to make sure this does not pop again.
If it doesn't then I will merge it right away as Jenkins and Travis are green.
Thx...
--
I'm keen to sit in on the Ci/CD work, but also the documentation work.
(re-writing the concepts section is 'onging')
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
Regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1495#issuecomment-219123470
I think we should merge this one at this point. @sverrirab my
understanding is that once #1533 is merged, this will be required. If that is
the case, when this one
Github user olivierlemasle commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1503#issuecomment-219121751
In the three tracebacks, the error is located in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/821b2da1267c486bb1f5c9e90d3d1969b6fe947f/tools/marvin/marvin/lib/ba
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1547#issuecomment-219121539
I like the first two.
The third should read something like:
CLOUDSTACK-8303 allow multiple ranges & finite lease time
the 4th and 5th I really need t
Github user PaulAngus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1537#issuecomment-219119839
Thanks Will.
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
Regards
Paul Angus
VP Technology
www.shapeblue.com
From: Will Steven
GitHub user DaanHoogland reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297
CLOUDSTACK-9203 Implement security group move on updateVM API call
cherry-picked from a exoscale internal fix
Conflicts:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/
Github user DaanHoogland closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
I am not sure what you are using in Spring but I have been using Spring
3.x.x with Java 8 for some time.
I can believe that Spring 4 is "better" than Spring 3 but you might see
if you can separate these two technology upgrades just to keep it simple.
There is enough in Java 8 to make a pretty b
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513#issuecomment-219109520
Holy errors batman!!!
It looks like it started like this:
```
[INFO] --- cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:instrument (default-cli) @
cloud-server
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1520#issuecomment-219105793
Awesome, thanks guys. I will merge this...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545#issuecomment-219104928
Ya, I like this. I think this is a nice advancement. If we are going to
try to get this into 4.9, I will need some help getting this moving forward
cause we are pre
All,
I've started some work [pr] that aims to adapt CloudStack to recent changes in
the environments and the ecosystem:
- Java8, Spring 4.x
- SystemD
- MariaDB and MySQL
- Reduce distro provided package dependency
- Packaging, CI and testing
These are long term goals but I've identified
Github user insom commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513#issuecomment-219101084
@swill Hmm. Now it's a _different_ Cobertura error
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-219101062
We have merge conflicts on this one. As soon as the merge conflicts are
sorted out, I will run CI against it and hopefully we can get some code reviews
quickly so we
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297#issuecomment-219100429
This one errored again in both Jenkins and Travis. Not sure if that
signifies an actual problem or if things are just acting up. I fix to some of
the issues in Jenk
Github user swill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1543#discussion_r63215625
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_acl_listvolume.py ---
@@ -357,9 +357,9 @@ def tearDownClass(cls):
cls.apiclient = super(TestVolumeLis
Github user swill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1543#discussion_r63215404
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_acl_listvolume.py ---
@@ -357,9 +357,9 @@ def tearDownClass(cls):
cls.apiclient = super(TestVolumeLis
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/798#issuecomment-219096839
@maneesha-p can you rebase and push so we can get this PR green? I would
love some code review as well. Thx...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1543#issuecomment-219095904
Thanks for the effort stabilizing Jenkins and Travis the last few days.
This has been super helpful as we get close to the freeze. Very much
appreciated. Most of t
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1543#issuecomment-219095201
Thanks @swill
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user The-Loeki commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1547#issuecomment-219094194
Like this then :dart:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-219093988
I will run this through my KVM CI right now...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1532#issuecomment-219093207
I am counting my own code review on this one given the scope of the change
and the fact that a review is the only thing holding this up. I will merge
this one...
-
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/38#issuecomment-219092042
Thanks for taking care of this @rhtyd. ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513#issuecomment-219091474
@insom yes, I tend to agree with you. the main reason I highlighted it was
because the error was network related and the code changed details related to
an interface
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-219088252
This one is coming back with a clean bill of health. I think we are ready
on this one. Can I get some code review? Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#issuecomment-219088009
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 85
Skipped: 0
Failed: 0
Errors: 0
Duration: 9h 21m 07s
```
**Associ
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1494#issuecomment-219087700
The CI does not cover the actual code, but instead makes sure nothing else
is broken by these changes. The test results provided by @nlivens show the
tests for the a
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1494#issuecomment-219086756
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 85
Skipped: 0
Failed: 0
Errors: 0
Duration: 9h 17m 55s
```
**Associ
Github user insom commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513#issuecomment-219085734
@swill I've closed and re-opened. This change is to a shell script only and
the failures are within Marvin, so I'm pretty confident that they are unrelated
to my prop
Github user insom closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user insom reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513
CLOUDSTACK-9362: Skip VXLANs when rewriting the bridge name for migrations
(4.8-2)
From the [JIRA
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9362):
>
https://github.com/
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513#issuecomment-219084969
@insom, @dmabry and @kiwiflyer, the CI failure seems like it could be
related to this change, but I can't be sure. Can you guys provide some
guidance since all of yo
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513#issuecomment-219084090
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 85
Skipped: 0
Failed: 1
Errors: 0
Duration: 9h 01m 07s
```
**Summary of the p
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1503#issuecomment-219083712
I have never seen these test failures before, so I believe they are somehow
related to this change. @olivierlemasle can you review the CI results and post
your feedb
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#issuecomment-219083470
@koushik-das I only use Vmware hypervisor so I couldn't test it for Xen or
KVM. However, I reviewed code and found
`copySnapshotToTemplateFromNfsToNfsXenserver` me
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1503#issuecomment-219082695
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 82
Skipped: 0
Failed: 0
Errors: 3
Duration: 8h 28m 52s
```
**Summary of the p
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
