assuming you are nlivens in cwiki you are added.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Nick LIVENS
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to submit a design document for CloudStack. I don't have any write
> access to the CWiki. I've created a ticket on INFRA, but they redirect me
> here.
> Could anyone give me edit
Hi,
I want to submit a design document for CloudStack. I don't have any write
access to the CWiki. I've created a ticket on INFRA, but they redirect me
here.
Could anyone give me edit permissions to the following page :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design
Or if that's no
Github user kansal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/858#issuecomment-187574951
Can someone else review this as well? Already have unit test cases in the
PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user kansal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1418#issuecomment-187574586
@alexandrelimassantana , I am not sure of how to simulate the actual
traffic sentinel resource. I can create a request with 20148 or more, but the
actual error is en
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-187544886
@pdion891 I did not see the issue you are facing.
I have enabled the remote access vpn from the cloudstack UI. I can see
xl2tpd running. I can also restart the x
Sure, you are now officially invited
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Nicolás Vázquez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I have an invitation to the Slack channel?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> 2015-12-03 11:48 GMT-03:00 Nux! :
>
> > https://drewdevault.com/2015/11/01/Please-stop-using-slack.html
> >
> > --
> > S
Hi,
Can I have an invitation to the Slack channel?
Thanks,
Nicolas
2015-12-03 11:48 GMT-03:00 Nux! :
> https://drewdevault.com/2015/11/01/Please-stop-using-slack.html
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "N
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-187396165
Hi @rafaelweingartner @kishankavala I've run test_ssvm.py,
test_secondary_storage.py and test_vm_life_cycle.py
integration tests under real hardware. This are my r
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1422#issuecomment-187386982
@remibergsma sounds like you got the tone of comment just right.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1422#issuecomment-187368247
@DaanHoogland I debugged so many routers recently that I think it's fair to
say this info on the top is most valuable :-) But feel free to disagree.
---
If you
Github user resmo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1248#issuecomment-187360919
@sureshanaparti yes, that would be great
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Erik
On 02/22/2016 01:50 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> Adding a boilerplate in the install/admin docs that says "If you have no
> other tools in place to handle system vm updates, consider enabling this
> option: x.y.z" is good enough for me.
> This is supposed to be a way for all those who don't have a
Github user davidamorimfaria commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1348#issuecomment-187342982
LGTM, 4.7.1 with this fix was installed on a live environment with success.
Instances can now be migrated to and from the kvm node that has an IP address
w
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-187282499
@DaanHoogland I don't have access on Apache jenkins; also this would
require some S3 storage or large disk space if we want to keep the rpms (say at
least for a mo
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-187261697
@bhaisaab can you port that job to apache?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1422#issuecomment-187260678
I agree with this at first sight. so LGTM but is this debatable? that would
inspire a requirement to have it conigurable or so, no? maybe this is not the
place
Good Initiative Rajsekhar !
I think this document should go into the admin-guide [1]. For sure the wiki
is easier to start with :-)
Thanks !
PL
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Rajsekhar K
wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> Thanks for your responses. I am sure we will be able to create a complete
> refer
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-187236270
PR Jenkins RPM build-regression job:
http://jenkins.bhaisaab.org:/job/cloudstack/160/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9295
On isolated networks, when allowing 0.0.0.0/0 on EGRESS for "ALL" and then
removing that, the rules are not properly cleaned, leaving the chain actually
accepting all traffic!
Please see http://img.nux.ro/fP3-Selection_123.png
--
Sent fro
Github user borisroman closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1400
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user miguelaferreira closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1285
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1348#issuecomment-187167486
@remibergsma @wido can we merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't like the idea cloudstack management handles the "apt-get update
> && apt-get upgrade" (I am -1 for this solution) or at least I would like
> to disable it by configuration, if we go this direction.
>
It should by no means be man
We are comparing different sources, I was comparing the 'official' e.g. the
documented template, not the one regularely built by jenkins.
--
Erik
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Remi Bergsma
wrote:
> It _must_ be lying :-)
>
> When I install a systemvm from this last build:
>
> http://jenkin
I think that there are two parts to this - creating system VMs and installing
them.
The systemvms need to have the automated build with versioning 4.5.2-1234 (I'd
like to see that shown in log on screen of all system vms)
+ we should have some direct control available in CloudStack of which tem
Hi
I don't like the idea cloudstack management handles the "apt-get update
&& apt-get upgrade" (I am -1 for this solution) or at least I would like
to disable it by configuration, if we go this direction.
We use ansible (what a surprise) to update the VR and also add some
custom patches to it. We
It _must_ be lying :-)
When I install a systemvm from this last build:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-xen.vhd.bz2
It has 4.6.0 version, but /etc/cloudstack-version shows it was built today.
cat /
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Remi Bergsma
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> The version might not change, but Jenkins builds new ones every night with
> latest OS patches:
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/
>
> Option 1) and 3) will work once we allow more space on the systemv
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Legit worry point.
>
> IMHO the updates of the VR and so on should be the job of whoever runs the
> cloud, just like it's the same person's job to keep the HVs up to date.
>
Well, to some point I agree, but we should do our best to red
Hi Erik,
The version might not change, but Jenkins builds new ones every night with
latest OS patches:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/
Option 1) and 3) will work once we allow more space on the systemvm template
for it to actually handle installing stuff. You then al
Hi Erik,
Legit worry point.
IMHO the updates of the VR and so on should be the job of whoever runs the
cloud, just like it's the same person's job to keep the HVs up to date.
I'm sure it's possible to get all the VRs registered in some sort of
ansible/puppet thingy and keep track of them this
As of 4.6 or so, we don't really need to distribute new system vm templates
all that often, and that is great for upgrades, but less so from a security
perspective.
With the current approach we ship old system vm templates, with out of date
packages, and there is currently no good out of the box w
Expunging is the final state of the vm. We don't have expunged state.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I ran into that as well, a while ago. IMNSHO the VM record should be
> deleted after the state expunging, so a state of expunged would never make
> sense. Deabatable of
33 matches
Mail list logo
