Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 1:57 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board >> >> Seems with have lazy conse

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: write logfile just before rebooting the h...

GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/145 write logfile just before rebooting the host As discussed with @wido @pyr and @nuxro added an extra log line. Tested it and it logs fine (tested to local disk) when syncing first:

RE: [DISCUSS] How to fix failing VR-mgmt server links

That’s true Somesh ,the recent VR aggregation functionality yielding better VR performance in the customer location. i.e. VR upgrade time reduces from hours to minute and it's there in ACS as well(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5779). Earlier without this feature, MS is to

Re: [DISCUSS] How to fix failing VR-mgmt server links

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/2015 04:52 PM, Somesh Naidu wrote: > It is true and I like the idea. I would just want to make sure the > agent footprint isn't too high. As opposed to CP/SS VM, we expect > to be a lot more VRs running in an environment. > I agree. Wouldn

RE: [DISCUSS] How to fix failing VR-mgmt server links

It is true and I like the idea. I would just want to make sure the agent footprint isn't too high. As opposed to CP/SS VM, we expect to be a lot more VRs running in an environment. Also, the recent VR aggregation, I believe ACS 4.5 has it, did reduce a lot of that barbaric stuff so we are still

Jenkins build issue: build-master-slowbuild

For about 2 weeks we are having this build that is broken. does anyone could have a look at it? is this cause by a recent commit ? I'm not sure what this is and how to mitigate this... Thanks

RE: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board

> -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 1:57 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board > > Seems with have lazy consensus. > > Will Stevens contributed CONTRIBUTING instructions at: >

Dependecy issue with juniper-contrail-api.jar

Hi everyone, I tried to compile cloustack 4.5 and I need some help with the following issue: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-plugin-network-contrail: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-network-contrail:jar:4.5.1-SNAPSHOT: Could not

Re: Doc Need to update for 4.5

Thanks for the clue, I'll update the doc for ACS 4.5. if you want to use ACS + XS6.5 you should use CloudStack 4.5.x you can build package from the 4.5 git branch, 4.5.1 is currently in RC phase hopefully release in less then a month. Regards, On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Keerthiraja SJ wro

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1079

See Changes: [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8361: Adding functionality in marvin to check the port groups in VCenter corresponding to configuration of traffics in physical networks -- [...trunca

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1078

See Changes: [wrodrigues] Adding license headers that made RAT fail -- [...truncated 10374 lines...] > Running query: create database `cloud` > Running query: GRA

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8361: Adding functionality in ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/144 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8361: Adding functionality in ...

Github user srikanteswartalluri commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/144#issuecomment-89240323 well written. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav

[DISCUSS] How to fix failing VR-mgmt server links

Hi, In large environments, one of the issues of a VM deployment or a network rule failing that I find commonly is that the mgmt server is unable to reach to the VR via the host because of network lag or issues between the host and the mgmt server. The sending operation on the link is tried abou

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #196

See

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8361: Adding functionality in ...

GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/144 CLOUDSTACK-8361: Adding functionality in marvin to check the port groups in VCenter corresponding to configuration of traffics in physical networks Adding common function in marvin which c

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #710

See Changes: [runseb] Add CONTRIBUTING instructions -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on coohq-slave-01 (cloudstack-bu

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1077

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] systemvmtemplate: increase /opt parititon by 100MB [runseb] Exclude CONTRIBUTING from RAT and link it on README -- [...truncated 10413 lines...] > Pro

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Adding license headers that made RAT fail

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/143 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Adding license headers that made RAT fail

GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/143 Adding license headers that made RAT fail - Test classes affected Build is passing fine and unit tests also running fine. You can merge this pull request into a Git repositor

Re: RAT failing

On it! Cheers, Wilder On 03 Apr 2015, at 10:14, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Wilder, > > Looks like you committed code without the ASF license header: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/wrapper > > Ca

Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board

Seems with have lazy consensus. Will Stevens contributed CONTRIBUTING instructions at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md I am pushing that to 4.5,4.4 and 4.3 and I will update our website contribution page, removing reference to RB. I will then put a message in the

RAT failing

Wilder, Looks like you committed code without the ASF license header: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/wrapper Can you fix that asap ? As a reminder ASF license header needs to be in every file or it need

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fix yum install require java => 1.7.0 whe...

Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/108#issuecomment-89206971 @ghxandsky I fixed it on master yesterday. Please verify. @bhaisaab This is not pushed to 4.5 -Original Message- From: "Rohit Ya