Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was
able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).
As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a
supported platform for CS 4.5.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
Can you try Server as 10.41.1.202 without appending cifs to it?
-Original Message-
From: Oleksyuk, Vasyl [mailto:oleks...@fizmat.tnpu.edu.ua]
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 6:58 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Not able to add CIFS primary Storage Cloudstack 4.4
Hello
I have tr
-1
A build blocker was fixed - the issue was after upgrade usage server failed to
start. Fixed on latest 4.5 now (CLOUDSTACK-7316). Please still continue to test.
> On 02-Feb-2015, at 7:42 am, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Did test upgrade from 4.2.1 with XenServer 6.2, Managemen
Thanks, Rohit
As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04
(which is what I'm running).
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to
> work for me. I’ve not tested it thorough
+1 (binding)
Did test upgrade from 4.2.1 with XenServer 6.2, Management-server running
on CentOs 6.6.
The Release-notes as been updated.
PL
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Did upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.5.0-snapshot with XenServer 6.2.
>
> Upgrade went smoothly, sys
Hello
I have tried to create zone with hyper-v hypervisor. The Cloudstack agent
is running on Windows Server. While adding CIFS primary storage I am
getting error:
*2015-02-01 13:23:05,010 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-468:ctx-e61355f1) POST response is
[{"com.cloud.ag
Roger, eclipse needs some extra space but also the maven run. you
should tweek it under run configurations. I don't run it from eclipse
a lot and I don't know what option-values are good.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Now that I think about it, I don't know if I ever bo
I just happen to be using 12.04.1, but I'm personally fine with upgrading.
I know that upgrading is sometimes easier said than done in production
environments, though, so it would be interesting to get feedback from users
on this.
On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Marcus wrote:
> Just to add to the
Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock,
even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport
things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though.
I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then
backed out because of the Ubu
If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has
never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working
due to that exception when I try to run a VM).
Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/302
Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Thanks, Marcus
>
> Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
> they resolved the issue, tho
11 matches
Mail list logo
