Re: [GUI Question] Snapshots Table

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I can open a ticket. I'll probably just assign it to myself and do it for 4.6. On Thursday, January 8, 2015, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > Any thoughts on why we don't have the name of the snapshots as a column in > the snapshots table? > > We show this kind of info for VM Snapshots, but not

RE: [GUI Question] Snapshots Table

2015-01-08 Thread Somesh Naidu
Agree. I guess it would be simpler to go to the volume and then list out its snapshots as they would be listed in the order they are created. +1 for the enhancement though, if you plan to raise one. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thur

Re: [GUI Question] Snapshots Table

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Yeah, the first field is Name. I guess the main problem with not having this data in the table is if I have multiple snapshots for the same volume, then I have to know the relative creation date in order to have a good chance at clicking on the right row in the table to get to the correct details

RE: [GUI Question] Snapshots Table

2015-01-08 Thread Somesh Naidu
Can you click on one of the snapshots and see what is the first field being displayed? -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 4:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [GUI Question] Snapshots Table This is

Re: Unable to add affinity group to instances in project

2015-01-08 Thread Erik Weber
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > >>Do you know if there's a reason behind that, or if it just hasn't been > implemented? > > Yes it just was not implemented back then because there was some thought > about deprecating projects eventually, which did not happen really.. > > I s

Re: New "snapshot(s)" text in GUI

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Just an FYI that I opened the following ticket for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8144 On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Suresh Sadhu wrote: > +1 for reverting. > > Sadhu > > -Original Message- > From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] > Sent: 3

Re: [GUI Question] Snapshots Table

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
This is what I see in 4.6 (code is recent as of yesterday): http://i.imgur.com/ogZiZpT.png Thanks! On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Somesh Naidu wrote: > I thought we did include the name both in the table and the UI, unless I > understood your query incorrectly, > > mysql> desc snapshots; > >

RE: [GUI Question] Snapshots Table

2015-01-08 Thread Somesh Naidu
I thought we did include the name both in the table and the UI, unless I understood your query incorrectly, mysql> desc snapshots; +--+-+--+-+-++ | Field| Type| Null | Key | Default | Extra |

[GUI Question] Snapshots Table

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi, Any thoughts on why we don't have the name of the snapshots as a column in the snapshots table? We show this kind of info for VM Snapshots, but not for "backup" Snapshot. Thanks, -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.73

Re: [QUESTION] Integration Port

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks for the response. I was under the impression that listAll used to return all volumes (regardless of account) when I issued the command via a web browser using 8096 in the past. Perhaps I was not remembering that correctly. Thanks again On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:

RE: Unable to add affinity group to instances in project

2015-01-08 Thread Prachi Damle
>>Do you know if there's a reason behind that, or if it just hasn't been implemented? Yes it just was not implemented back then because there was some thought about deprecating projects eventually, which did not happen really.. Supporting it now should not be a big change though, I think there i

RE: [QUESTION] Integration Port

2015-01-08 Thread Prachi Damle
Hey Mike, I am not aware if anything has changed w.r.t listAll recently. But just mentioning that with port 8096, CS assumes that the caller is the System user (ACCOUNT_TYPE_ADMIN) So listVolumes without listAll = true will list only the Volumes owned by the System account, which will be an emp

Re: Unable to add affinity group to instances in project

2015-01-08 Thread Erik Weber
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Erik, > Hi Prachi, thanks for coming back to me :-) > Affinity groups feature does not support Projects. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups > > Do you know if there's a reason beh

RE: Unable to add affinity group to instances in project

2015-01-08 Thread Prachi Damle
Hi Erik, Affinity groups feature does not support Projects. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups >> It fails for new deployments having affinity group rules as well. Are these new deployments using projectId parameter too? Thanks, Prachi ___

RE: [QUESTION] Integration Port

2015-01-08 Thread Stephen Turner
Min or Prachi might have some information on this. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: 08 January 2015 18:54 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Vania Xu Subject: [QUESTION] Integration Port Hi, I noticed with 4.6 that i

[QUESTION] Integration Port

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi, I noticed with 4.6 that if I run this command that I get back no volumes: http://192.168.129.88:8096/api?command=listVolumes This seemed odd (since I have user-facing volumes) and I tracked it down to one parameter: listAll It appears when using the integration port that listAll is null by

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #880

2015-01-08 Thread jenkins
See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #879

2015-01-08 Thread jenkins
See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-jdk18 #2

2015-01-08 Thread jenkins
See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-jdk18 #1

2015-01-08 Thread jenkins
See -- Started by user Hugo [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos7-6b2 (cloudstack-buildslave-centos7) in workspace

Re: CS MS Logging Level

2015-01-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
It seems I had thrown away another log4j conf to get this working:( I did a clean checkout and my trick isn't working anymore. keep you posted On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Great - thanks, Daan! > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > >> I got aroun

Re: CS MS Logging Level

2015-01-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Great - thanks, Daan! On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I got around looking at this (under peer pressure @SBP;) There is a > property to maven jetty plugin: > > > log4j.configuration > ${project.build.directory}/log4j.xml

Re: CS MS Logging Level

2015-01-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
I got around looking at this (under peer pressure @SBP;) There is a property to maven jetty plugin: log4j.configuration ${project.build.directory}/log4j.xml doing some final test before checking in. Not sure what changed

RE: Vlan issue with ACS 4.4 and XenServer 6.2

2015-01-08 Thread Matthew Midgett
Yes I sure did and I can see in xenserver that the vlan is created and the vm is attached to the right vlan. On Jan 8, 2015, 2:25 AM, at 2:25 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote: >Hi Matt, > >Did you specify vlan ID as 501 while creating private network with >public ips in cloudstack? > >-Sanjeev >

Re: for non-committer member , how could we contribute to cwiki pages?

2015-01-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
ChunFeng, you're in, please have a try On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > I think any PMC or person with admin rights on Confluence/Cwiki.a.o > should be able to grant you rights. Hugo, Chip, Daan, others? > > > On Thursday 08 January 2015 04:39 PM, ChunFeng wrote: >> >> Hi all

Re: for non-committer member , how could we contribute to cwiki pages?

2015-01-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
I think any PMC or person with admin rights on Confluence/Cwiki.a.o should be able to grant you rights. Hugo, Chip, Daan, others? On Thursday 08 January 2015 04:39 PM, ChunFeng wrote: Hi all, I want to share some of my configuration experience about cygwin on windows , however I am no

for non-committer member , how could we contribute to cwiki pages?

2015-01-08 Thread ChunFeng
Hi all, I want to share some of my configuration experience about cygwin on windows , however I am not editor to modify below link page : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Setting+up+a+CloudStack+dev+environment+on+Windows for non-committer member , how co

Re: jenkins jobs

2015-01-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
I would say don't delete any job of 4.3/4.2 or old/obsolete releases, remove any builds and disable (older) jobs such as 4.3 systemvms etc. 4.3 jobs are not needed now (unless we'll do some kind of release in future) so I would say we can safely disable them or remove old builds but please DO NOT

Re: jenkins jobs

2015-01-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
I don't seem to have enough rights to do this work so two questions for now: @Rohit/Will: how much of the 4.3 jobs are still needed? Last succesful ones are 20 days old and some (systemvm) seem to have never worked. @Edison: can you have a look at fastbuildserver and linodebuildserver? The slave

Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.3

2015-01-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
people, this thread is obsolete. please look at the 4.4.3 release candidate On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Nux! wrote: > Rohit, > > What do you mean by "a 4.4.2 patch"? > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "

Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.3

2015-01-08 Thread Nux!
Rohit, What do you mean by "a 4.4.2 patch"? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Rohit Yadav" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 8 January, 2015 07:42:35 > Subject: Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.3 > I think we sho

RE: Potential feature: Firewall comments

2015-01-08 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
+1 for adding description and "Deny" option to the firewall API -Original Message- From: Logan Barfield [mailto:lbarfi...@tqhosting.com] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 10:00 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Potential feature: Firewall comments On this same note: Is there c

RE: StorageManager-Scavenger tries to delete VMs that are no longer existing.

2015-01-08 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Hi, If the volume is not needed mark the removed column and set state to "Expunged" for the first entry. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 2:42 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: StorageManag