My suggestions and comments;
- Build a rpm/deb repository before you start voting (we can use
packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing)
- Tag each Voting Candidate (using a -vc or -rc suffix followed by the round
number, for example 4.4.2-rc-01) and we build rpm/deb repo using tags.
- This re
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion
wrote:
> I agree that more tests are welcome, we have to try then :)
>
>
On the other side, how many devs can say that they really like to do
thorough release testing? My guess is that it's a rather small number.
By adding users, and if testing ac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28114/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7923
http
I'm trying to build 4.4.2 from 4.4 branch. I'm having the db deployment
error that schema-441to442.sql does not exist. Could it be the cause of the
problem you are seeing too ?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I run into a strange exception during the spring load phase. Di
I agree that more tests are welcome, we have to try then :)
> Afaik non-pmc's aren't binding and any votes would merely be an
indication,
> or do i misunderstand?
All votes are important [1] and count as indicator, who ever vote mean
something, It also show that the community members did some te
Den søndag 16. november 2014 skrev Pierre-Luc Dion
følgende:
> I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@
> related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an RC
> it would potentially involved more people in the test phases.
>
>
I must disagree. Crea
Hi Pierre,
So advanced and basic are running from code on the host machine. Only a
NFS, MySQL and hypervisor box is supplied.
Testing is for binary-installation-advanced and binary-installation-basic.
On 16 November 2014 19:44, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> I'm trying it as it seams quit
Hi Ian,
I'm trying it as it seams quite strait forward. although, the instruction
to install cloudstack [1]: I should run that in the management VM right,
not locally ? does IPs are hardcoded somewhere?
Thanks, that's awesome to have a local cloudstack running without effort.
I'm testing this on
> I think the general problem here is that for each voting candidate adding
users@ML would be only useful if we also build a deb/rpm repo for them to
test the voting candidate so everyone won’t have to build their own
CloudStack. My suggestion is to do that, and I think we can have the
testing rep
I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@
related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an RC
it would potentially involved more people in the test phases.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
>
> > On 16-Nov-2014, at 9:50 pm, Ian
> On 16-Nov-2014, at 9:50 pm, Ian Duffy wrote:
>
>
> Just out of interest, is there some reason we don't include the users
> mailing list within vote threads for feedback around product stability?
>
> From what I've seen a lot of them have test labs. It would be nice to get
> their feedback befor
+1
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Ian Duffy"
> To: "CloudStack Dev"
> Sent: Sunday, 16 November, 2014 16:20:55
> Subject: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?
> Hi All,
>
> Just out of inter
Hi All,
Just out of interest, is there some reason we don't include the users
mailing list within vote threads for feedback around product stability?
>From what I've seen a lot of them have test labs. It would be nice to get
their feedback before releasing rather than after...
Thanks,
Ian
TL;DR: Devcloud 4 cleaned up a bit, chef attributes no longer hidden,
further user customisation allowed, Testers wanted.
** advanced zone on 4.4.* isn't supported due to a change on some API param
for setting tags on interfaces **
Hi All,
https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/dev/binary-i
Only one table will be affected.
> On 16-Nov-2014, at 3:14 am, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
>
> Question - What happens to the already existing VMs with entries in the
> DB? Do we keep it NULL?
NULL will be and not useful. I think it should be okay to have a db migration
path that sets user_id to the f
15 matches
Mail list logo
