Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1

David, this is very depending on the amount/nature of the upgrade code from 4.3.0 to 4.3.1 In the best case no extra upgrade code has to be written and the 4.3.0 to 4.4.0 code can be used. In the worst case a full set of conditional schema changes has to be created. I am not pessimistic, totally ag

Re: [ACS44] CLOUDSTACK-6908: Enable IPv6 in sysctl when only necessary

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > 60e46293234cccea5d2bd31588123e65af3e9bad is in -- Daan

[ACS44] CLOUDSTACK-6908: Enable IPv6 in sysctl when only necessary

Hi Daan, Please cherry-pick following commit from 4.4-forward. Thanks! commit 60e46293234cccea5d2bd31588123e65af3e9bad Author: Sheng Yang Date: Fri Jun 13 11:05:35 2014 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-6908: Enable IPv6 in sysctl when only necessary This new way would only enable IPv6 when VR is cr

CloudStack-3831

I have created a patch for CloudStack-3831, but unfortunately I am having an issue getting it submitted to the review board. Upon submission I get the following error: Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request

Re: DevCloud replacement

Caching of templates would be great, looking forward to your work on rest of the designs. Cheers. On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Awesome! > > I'm still tweaking things here and there. For whatever reason my internet > connection to S3 is very poor so I'm insuring that cac

Re: DevCloud replacement

Awesome! I'm still tweaking things here and there. For whatever reason my internet connection to S3 is very poor so I'm insuring that caching of templates on the host via vagrant-cachier works 100%. Will do out more in-depth documentation over the next 2 weeks. Will explain what makes up the boxe

Re: DevCloud replacement

Thanks for your work Ian, it's up and running, and I finally have a Xen vm/box to play with. Cheers. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > Thank you for the PR :) was meaning to add a section on the vagrant setup. > > I've recently extended some of it to use vagran

Unable to start primary and secondary storage instances

Hello, I am trying to run the cloudstack (4.4), where the following are warnings shown, Unable to acquire lock on storage vm WARN [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:ctx-23287615) Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm java.lang.RuntimeException: Job failed due to

Re: DevCloud replacement

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Just out of interest. > > Is there any reason we don't use devcloud.sql to modify the service > offerings and disk offerings to use local storage? > > I think we should do it, I used to do it myself (manually though). I was also thinking t

Re: DevCloud replacement

Just out of interest. Is there any reason we don't use devcloud.sql to modify the service offerings and disk offerings to use local storage? On 13 June 2014 19:21, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > Thank you for the PR :) was meaning to add a section on the vagrant setup. > > I've recently

Re: DevCloud replacement

Hi Rohit, Thank you for the PR :) was meaning to add a section on the vagrant setup. I've recently extended some of it to use vagrant-cachier for caching the systemvm templates. On 13 June 2014 19:05, Rohit Yadav wrote: > I've fixed README: https://github.com/imduffy15/GSoC-2014/pull/1 > > I

Re: DevCloud replacement

I've fixed README: https://github.com/imduffy15/GSoC-2014/pull/1 I installed two vagrant plugins and now it has started to work :) Still under progress. Cheers. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I tried to launch using vagrant up and getting following errors r

Re: DevCloud replacement

Hi Ian, I tried to launch using vagrant up and getting following errors related to librarian_chef and omnibus. I just followed the README file - cloned your repo, updated submodules (so they are cloned too) and did vagrant up. Before opening issue on JIRA, I thought I share it here. Here's the fu

Re: 2014-6-09 Japanese CloudStack Community Weekly Update

You guys are doing great work, simply amazing, please keep it up! On 6/8/14, 10:14 PM, Mayumi K wrote: Hi everyone Activities of Japanese CloudStack Community. ## Event [6/12] JCSUG will hold a Meet-up in Hokkaido [6/13] Interop Tokyo 2014 : JCSUG will have a session. http://www.inte

Re: hackathon CCCEU14

Whatever I find company for, because sitting and working alone is what I can do anytime :-) On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > kocka, go ahead and edit (though you can't work on all of those > subjects during the hackathon, hope you realize that) > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 a

Re: Review Request 22554: CLOUDSTACK-6909 - fix marvin's handling of SMB credentials for storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/ --- (Updated June 13, 2014, 4:53 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

Creating BareMetal templates from vmid via API

Hello, Please forgive me for crossposting - I originally sent this to users, but then realized dev was probably a more appropriate mailing list. I am trying to create a BareMetal template based on vm id using the CloudStack API. The API documentations suggests that this should be possible by prov

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collect and provide generic key/value pairs to storage plug-ins

Thanks for the detailed response, John! When Chris Suich (formerly from NetApp) and I talked about this several months ago, we were thinking that this would replace the need for storage tagging. However, as you point out, I now think it does not. We were originally figuring that by specifically s

Re: DevCloud replacement

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Thanks Sebastien and of course Ian, > > I will try. BUT i think the reason is that xcp is not well supported > and devcloud is not based on xenserver but on xcp or even a vanilla > (debian/ubuntu?) xen. So will we continue on Ians path or go

Re: DevCloud replacement

Thanks Sebastien and of course Ian, I will try. BUT i think the reason is that xcp is not well supported and devcloud is not based on xenserver but on xcp or even a vanilla (debian/ubuntu?) xen. So will we continue on Ians path or go back and fix devcloud? On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, sebgoa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collect and provide generic key/value pairs to storage plug-ins

+1 to Johns first comment; I think we need it in a more generic way then for storage plugins. I am sure network providers/loadbalancers/firewalls need such properties as well. John, should we make your ExtensionPropertyType a generic and let the convert-methods deal with the parameter types instea

DevCloud replacement

Hi folks, As you know I love Devcloud, but it has its pains and lately it got broken in 4.3, and I don't think it works with 4.4. So I encourage you to check out: https://github.com/imduffy15/GSoC-2014 This works out of the box. It is from Ian , it uses Vagrant boxes that are available in the

Re: [ACS44] CLOUDSTACK-6464

ok, please note discussions on 4.3.1 and my comment in it. The db upgrade solution will go in the alleged 4.3.1! I changed the bug to fix-version 4.4.0 but will put it back to 4.3.1. It is solved this way in the coming 4.4.0 as well. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Simon Weller wrote: > Daan, >

RE: Unable to create a Template from ROOT Volume Snapshot

I'm using Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 and XenServer 6.0.2. Thank you, Suneel Mallela From: Venkata Suneel Babu Mallela Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 11:31 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Unable to create a Template from ROOT Volume Snapshot Hi All, I tried to cr

Re: Code Documentation

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Santhosh Edukulla < santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Many of code areas under CS, currently don't have enough documentation i > believe, we have few one liner comments at places. But, largely, was > missing at various code areas. > > We in one of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Collect and provide generic key/value pairs to storage plug-ins

Mike, I completely agree with the need to attach driver-specified key-value pairs to a storage driver (we have been batting this around for nearly a year). However, I think this facility should be generalized to support all drivers (e.g. network, compute, etc) where storage maybe the first lay

Re: Review Request 22549: CLOUDSTACK-6887: Fixing account cleanup issue across multiple test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22549/#review45615 --- Commit 59a98839ce895cef6e4864f37fd831805d1da8f1 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22549: CLOUDSTACK-6887: Fixing account cleanup issue across multiple test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22549/#review45614 --- Commit b849b7ee3d9b4a141c2eb3fd689d197ed20c4581 in cloudstack's bran

RE: [ACS44] CLOUDSTACK-6464

Daan, Thanks for following up. Both Marcus and Edison have been involved looking at this bug, and it appears to be related to what CS expects in the cloud.vlan table between releases. This issue affects both untagged networks and tagged networks in the same manner, and simply changing the vlan

Re: [ACS44] cherry-pick request

both pulled On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Murali Reddy wrote: > Daan, > > Please cherry-pick below commits in 4.4-forward into 4.4 > > commit be937a08213f06a801cf07d19867d48dad35d19f > CLOUDSTACK-6832: [OVS]vnet is not released even the network is deleted > > fix ensures allocated VNET is

[ACS44] cherry-pick request

Daan, Please cherry-pick below commits in 4.4-forward into 4.4 commit be937a08213f06a801cf07d19867d48dad35d19f CLOUDSTACK-6832: [OVS]vnet is not released even the network is deleted fix ensures allocated VNET is released during network shutdown commit 9dfbdb5ffd2f0981651bc98f1c5d71718a

Re: Review Request 22549: CLOUDSTACK-6887: Fixing account cleanup issue across multiple test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22549/#review45609 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Girish Shilamkar On June 13, 2014, 7:42 a.m.

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Implementation of DNS Provider for Bind (for 4.5)

Hi Silvano, On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Silvano Nogueira Buback < silv...@corp.globo.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > > I work at Globo.com, a media company in Brazil. Here we use a cloudstack > private network with an advanced zone setup (isolated vlans). > > For some couple of reasons, the nam

Re: [ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6897, CLOUDSTACK-6868, CLOUDSTACK-6872, CLOUDSTACK-6867, CLOUDSTACK-6865

4 picked On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > Hi Daan/Hugo, > > > > Can you please cherry-pick following commits from 4.4-forward to 4.4: > > > > commit 2dc9e2c530b36efc4c4684e13ae0412103925d05 > > Author: Anshul Gangwar > > Date: Thu Jun 12 13:54:56 2014 +0530 > > > >

Re: Review Request 22414: CLOUDSTACK-6865, CLOUDSTACK-6868: [hyper-v] attach volume of vhd format volume is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45607 --- Commit a951b51523069e72e5cd1e503df11b9370b6d6d8 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22415: CLOUDSTACK-6867: added the option for vhdx image format in upload volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22415/#review45606 --- Commit 2c5f352e94e071113ae1bbf74435662568902043 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22452: CLOUDSTACK-6872 : removed the redundant connectToRemote method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22452/#review45605 --- Commit ef0cec938165fdf3531f92dc8f4c2930ff95fa5e in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22414: CLOUDSTACK-6865, CLOUDSTACK-6868: [hyper-v] attach volume of vhd format volume is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45608 --- Commit a951b51523069e72e5cd1e503df11b9370b6d6d8 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22500: CLOUDSTACK-6897: In a Multi cluster setup attach of a uploaded volume to a VM on zwps is failing with scope conflict

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22500/#review45604 --- Commit 117c8fe5b0e1b9f1045cbf65e3285fbf205770bf in cloudstack's bran

[ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6897, CLOUDSTACK-6868, CLOUDSTACK-6872, CLOUDSTACK-6867, CLOUDSTACK-6865

Hi Daan/Hugo, Can you please cherry-pick following commits from 4.4-forward to 4.4: commit 2dc9e2c530b36efc4c4684e13ae0412103925d05 Author: Anshul Gangwar Date: Thu Jun 12 13:54:56 2014 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-6897: when we try to attach the uploaded/allocated volume to a VM on zwps, then we

Re: Review Request 22554: CLOUDSTACK-6909 - fix marvin's handling of SMB credentials for storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/#review45598 --- tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py

Re: Review Request 22500: CLOUDSTACK-6897: In a Multi cluster setup attach of a uploaded volume to a VM on zwps is failing with scope conflict

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22500/#review45600 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On June 13, 2014, 9:08 a.m., A

Re: Review Request 22500: CLOUDSTACK-6897: In a Multi cluster setup attach of a uploaded volume to a VM on zwps is failing with scope conflict

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22500/#review45599 --- Commit aa21cdcd494aff1df119d2e17a3a51da861e3f51 in cloudstack's bran

Review Request 22554: CLOUDSTACK-6909 - fix marvin's handling of SMB credentials for storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22554/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6909 https://issues.apache.

Re: Review Request 22414: CLOUDSTACK-6865, CLOUDSTACK-6868: [hyper-v] attach volume of vhd format volume is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45595 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On June 10, 2014, 11:23 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 22452: CLOUDSTACK-6872 : removed the redundant connectToRemote method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22452/#review45597 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On June 11, 2014, 7:31 a.m., A

Re: Review Request 22415: CLOUDSTACK-6867: added the option for vhdx image format in upload volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22415/#review45596 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On June 11, 2014, 5:20 a.m., A

Re: Review Request 22500: CLOUDSTACK-6897: In a Multi cluster setup attach of a uploaded volume to a VM on zwps is failing with scope conflict

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22500/ --- (Updated June 13, 2014, 9:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1

Sebastian, Please disregard the revert request, Thanks, ilya On 6/12/14, 5:55 PM, ilya musayev wrote: Sebastian, Please cherry-pick following commits: CLOUDSTACK-5891.[VMware] If a template has been registered and "cpu.corespersocket... https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.g

Re: Review Request 22414: CLOUDSTACK-6865, CLOUDSTACK-6868: [hyper-v] attach volume of vhd format volume is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45590 --- Commit 66d1eb92f03c39734dcaf83e20639cd9a338e388 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22452: CLOUDSTACK-6872 : removed the redundant connectToRemote method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22452/#review45592 --- Commit b43036d10e718eea869574780e8ad70b18862b16 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22415: CLOUDSTACK-6867: added the option for vhdx image format in upload volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22415/#review45591 --- Commit 7ea3930ae9770c2c52749de9a523f007b80d8b24 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22414: CLOUDSTACK-6865, CLOUDSTACK-6868: [hyper-v] attach volume of vhd format volume is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45589 --- Commit 66d1eb92f03c39734dcaf83e20639cd9a338e388 in cloudstack's bran

Re: FindBugs report disabled ?

I disabled it as it did no longer give output on where new issues were found. I started building a new job called master-slowbuild. It is not fully functional and it slipped my mind. there is non for 4.4 On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for Find

[ACS44] moving issues to 4.5

tagging the subject On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >>> [Animesh] Every release has a filter for new features and improvements. >>> Here is one for 4.4 that I had setup a while back >>> https://issues.apache.o

moving issues to 4.5

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> [Animesh] Every release has a filter for new features and improvements. >> Here is one for 4.4 that I had setup a while back >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326986 > [Animesh] 9 of these issues are still open and I s

Re: hackathon CCCEU14

kocka, go ahead and edit (though you can't work on all of those subjects during the hackathon, hope you realize that) On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Hi, > > Could you give me write permission to the wiki? Or you can just add me to > the wikipage, I will want to work a li

Review Request 22549: CLOUDSTACK-6887: Fixing account cleanup issue across multiple test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22549/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6887 h

Re: Review Request 22414: CLOUDSTACK-6865, CLOUDSTACK-6868: [hyper-v] attach volume of vhd format volume is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45582 --- Commit ebff469b46551f8613013e80aa0386203a9c7912 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22500: CLOUDSTACK-6897: In a Multi cluster setup attach of a uploaded volume to a VM on zwps is failing with scope conflict

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22500/#review45585 --- Commit 2dc9e2c530b36efc4c4684e13ae0412103925d05 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22415: CLOUDSTACK-6867: added the option for vhdx image format in upload volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22415/#review45583 --- Commit 2e49ef73bfcb548cf19d1230f00a0510b7d09150 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22452: CLOUDSTACK-6872 : removed the redundant connectToRemote method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22452/#review45584 --- Commit cef29948a708fbbae1261dbd8b6a13e4da19c703 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22414: CLOUDSTACK-6865, CLOUDSTACK-6868: [hyper-v] attach volume of vhd format volume is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22414/#review45581 --- Commit ebff469b46551f8613013e80aa0386203a9c7912 in cloudstack's bran