RE: AWS api when running mvn jetty

Chris, 'mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run' doesn't run awsapi. To run awsapi you will have to run maven jetty goal 'mvn -Pawsapi -pl :cloud-awsapi jetty:run'. Also, don't forget to use the awsapi profile while building the code 'mvn clean install -P systemvm -P awsapi -Dnoredist'. Thanks, L

AWS api when running mvn jetty

Hi forum, Does the maven jetty goal "mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run" also run the AWS api? I can't see anything running on port 7080 after starting jetty. Is it possible to run the AWS api from the maven jetty goal? How? Many thanks, Chris

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:40:04AM -0400, Tim Mackey wrote: > Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer > to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project > 4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and > interest

Re: Review Request 18392: CLOUDSTACK-6156: remove rampart maven dependencies to fix?

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18392/#review37691 --- Commit 4494cbb4c37e49ffbad4eebecb695bb99c6cbae3 in cloudstack's bran

Re: random template from zones

Edison, did you cherry-pick https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=1b06451 5ac9c7f87e1780ab2210e60723f9d541c to 4.4 and master? It is in 4.3. Thanks -min On 3/18/14 3:45 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Min, Edison, > >As discussed in a prior mailthread [1] templates b

Re: [MERGE] resize-root branch

Verified your fix, my IAM test passed. Thanks for the fix, Marcus. -min On 3/17/14 10:39 PM, "Marcus" wrote: >This commit in 4.4 should fix it (cherry picked to master as well): > >commit 8eed3c5113d1141be820077e121db802566faec6 >Author: Marcus Sorensen >Date: Fri Mar 14 07:13:34 2014 -0600

RE: Java Coding Convention Errors

Hi Hugo, Thanks for the direction, I followed that pattern, -Soheil From: Hugo Trippaers [trip...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:43 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Java Coding Convention Errors Hey Soheil, Isn't is possible to st

Re: Review Request 19038: CLOUDSTACK-6090: Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19038/#review37641 --- core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/GetRouterAlertsAnswer.java

Re: upgrading from CloudPlatform 4.2.0 to CloudStack 4.3.0

Marcus: Thank you for responding to me. I use XenServer. I noticed the relationship between the vm_template::id and the directory names under /mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/. The original installation is CloudPlatform 4.2.0, all templates are under /mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/. Once I upgraded it

[EVENT] CloudStack Bay Area Meetup

Hi All, The CloudStack Bay Area meet-up is tomm, this time at NetApp! Do swing by for a hands-on session by David Nalley. Here are the details: Date: Wednesday, March 19th, 2014 Time: 6:00pm - 9:00pm Details: Registration / Refreshments from 6:00pm - 6:30pm. Hands-on CloudStack Session with D

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Hi there Ilya, Could you please provide which tests cases you have covered? I would like to add them to my tests round as well. Currently I'm testing multiple zones, networks, instances, ACLs, Port Forwarding and will add security groups. If you have more points, I would be glad to test them a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

+1 binding On 3/18/14, 3:05 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 0810029f274878eca8fd74b44

Re: Anybody saw this error on master?

Hi Sanjay - I still this issue popping up right after starting MS in 4.4. You might want to check. My XS version - 6.0.2 , commit - 30a9838 [INFO] Started Jetty Server WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-6:ctx-7cd2f40f) Unable to get GPU statsYou tried to call a method that does not

Re: Java Coding Convention Errors

Hey Soheil, Isn't is possible to stick to the CloudStack standards and use the SerializedName annotation? http://google-gson.googlecode.com/svn/tags/1.2.3/docs/javadocs/com/google/gson/annotations/SerializedName.html Another option is to set a policy on gson that will automagically translate th

RE: Java Coding Convention Errors

Here is a proposed solution to evaluate, use the maven-checkstyle-plugin exclude feature to make exception for modules that have code convention to conform to external structures. Here is sample for my use case: maven-checkstyle-plugin **/infoblox/Infoblo

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 0810029f274878eca8fd74b44ab1117054e929a5 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: ht

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 7:04 AM > To: Animesh Chaturvedi > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > On 17.03.2014 22:39, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > Edison

Re: Review Request 19351: Fixed updating ipset on acquiring vm nic secondary ip for advanced SG zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19351/#review37596 --- Even for the Basic zone, we should send the ipSet command on nicplug

Re: Review Request 19351: Fixed updating ipset on acquiring vm nic secondary ip for advanced SG zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19351/#review37590 --- And the reason why you have to do so - in SG enabled Advance zone, y

Re: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above.

It's all third-party code, so I don't see any problem checking it in the week after feature freeze (i.e. this week). On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Sounds good - thanks! > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Edison Su wrote: > >> I ch

Re: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above.

Sounds good - thanks! On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Edison Su wrote: > I checked the patch into master branch already, if no objection, I'll > merge it into 4.4 at the end of today. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 1

Re: Review Request 19351: Fixed updating ipset on acquiring vm nic secondary ip for advanced SG zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19351/#review37589 --- Jayapal, you shoudldn't rely on SG attribute of the zone. You should

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37582 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On March 13, 2014, 9:16 a.m., puni

Re: Review Request 18552: Internal LB support for Juniper contrail VPC implementation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18552/#review37581 --- 1) Why you've decided to introduce a new provider for the Internal L

RE: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above.

I checked the patch into master branch already, if no objection, I'll merge it into 4.4 at the end of today. > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:08 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: FW: cloudbyte storage plugi

Re: CloudStack implementations

If you do the math on that twitter slide, it looks like the poll represents ~140 responses. I wonder how that poll was marketed as opposed to Giles' 270 responses. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 18.03.2014 11:07, Marcus wrote: >> >> Do we have any general stats on how cloudsta

FW: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above.

Seems 4.4 branch is created already, but we(Mike and I) forgot to push CloudByte plugin into 4.4 branch last week, due to miscommunication between us. Is it still ok to push cloudByte plugin into 4.4 branch? The plugin code is self-contained, good to add it into 4.4 branch. From: Punith S [mailt

Re: Review Request 19062: Per contrail implementation, CS ingress policy mapping: rule cidr should be mapped to src net, dst net is 'local' i.e same as 'guest network' on which rule is applied

> On March 18, 2014, 6 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! Committed to MASTER. Thanks! - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19062/#review37577 --

Re: Review Request 19062: Per contrail implementation, CS ingress policy mapping: rule cidr should be mapped to src net, dst net is 'local' i.e same as 'guest network' on which rule is applied

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19062/#review37577 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On March 11, 2014, 7:42 p.m., Sur

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Hi Alena, Actually I just had a quick look at the management server logs and I see this error. MySQL server is running, so not sure what is causing it: 2014-03-18 17:37:12,453 ERROR [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (main:null) Unable to get a new db connection com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLNonTran

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Florin, can you check the output of the following DB query: Select * from configuration where name="hypervisor.list" On 3/18/14, 10:17 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu" wrote: >Apologies for the missing link. Screenshot of the GUI bug is here: > >http://imgur.com/FL9OnY0 > >Thanks, >Florin > > >-Or

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Apologies for the missing link. Screenshot of the GUI bug is here: http://imgur.com/FL9OnY0 Thanks, Florin -Original Message- From: Florin Dumitrascu [mailto:florin.dumitra...@intunenetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 5:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apa

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Hi, I am trying to create an advanced zone using RC8, but I am blocked even from the first steps. As seen in the attached image, I cannot select the Hypervisor type from the drop down box. Has anyone else seen this behaviour ? Thanks, Florin -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturv

Re: CloudStack implementations

On 18.03.2014 11:07, Marcus wrote: Do we have any general stats on how cloudstack is being used? Common deployment sizes, largest deployments, etc? I'm curious as to how far people have actually scaled it in real deployments, although I realize that the info can be proprietary. (copying same

RE: CloudStack implementations

+1 on this tool. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: 18 March 2014 11:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack implem

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

On 18.03.2014 16:48, sebgoa wrote: +1 in general, I am not sure what would be best between libvirt and libxl though. but as you know there might be a quick path to reuse the KVM agent and use libvirt to interact with xenproject +1 XenProject +1 Reuse KVM/libvirt agent Good ideas! :) -- Sent

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

> On March 14, 2014, 12:14 p.m., Damodar Reddy Talakanti wrote: > > Hi Daan > > > > I have updated the FS in wiki regarding how to build and install using this > > code. The link to FS is > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Windowsfication#CloudstackWindow

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

On Mar 18, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer > to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project > 4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and > interest in alterna

RE: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

+1. I find it confusing that "Xen" is used for XenServer rather than XenProject, and I think it would be good to be explicit about which we mean in each case. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 March 2014 15:40 To: dev@cloudstack

Re: IAM guidelines for CS APIs

Review board with patches that are linked to JIRA should be the right way to go. Do let us know what you are going to work on to avoid overlapping. Thanks -min From: David Grizzanti mailto:david.grizza...@sungard.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 7:46 AM To: Min Chen mailto:min.c...@citrix.c

Re: [MERGE] resize-root branch

Yes, that is the root cause for the failure. Thanks -min On 3/17/14 10:26 PM, "Marcus" wrote: >Looks like all of the items in 'details' are getting added to the API >call as empty params: > >GET >/client/api?domainid=7193957c-ab53-11e3-a79c-000c29d82947&zoneid=bfc93d0d- >9531-4648-9d04-ca1f47f

Re: [MERGE] resize-root branch

Thanks -min On 3/17/14 10:39 PM, "Marcus" wrote: >This commit in 4.4 should fix it (cherry picked to master as well): > >commit 8eed3c5113d1141be820077e121db802566faec6 >Author: Marcus Sorensen >Date: Fri Mar 14 07:13:34 2014 -0600 > >Change newly added details map for deployVirtualMachin

Re: CloudStack implementations

I was thinking something along the same lines. The current API & UI plugin frameworks would allow for an optional plugin which can be added to any deployment post-install. It could allow for configurable reporting so that users can decide what information is acceptable to report. If we can get t

Re: CloudStack implementations

I think its critical. It's difficult for me to pitch CloudStack as a solution if I have no stats to show what's possible or how much of a userbase it has. It would have been nice to have that yesterday. I think in the past year things have gone backward in this regard, as there used to at least be

RE: orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot Call

Just a note to say I've got the fix in testing. Even if it's not used, if it's still in the code it should at least work. Dangerous to have something saying it's worked when it hasn't. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapebl

[PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project 4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and interest in alternate architectures like ARM, the loose definition of our Xen

Re: Cloudstack documentation

On Mar 18, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Thanks Sebastien, > > > Seams quite complete! Is there a reason why doc url on > http://cloudstack.apache.org/ still point to the old doc ? My plan is to make the switch once 4.3 is out. There is still some cleaning up to do on the .rst/R

Re: Cloudstack documentation

Thanks Sebastien, Seams quite complete! Is there a reason why doc url on http://cloudstack.apache.org/ still point to the old doc ? Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 514-447-3456, 1101 - - - *CloudOps*420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @Cl

Re: IAM guidelines for CS APIs

Min, Thanks for the overview.  Will take a look at this and starting reviewing with the team here to see where we can contribute. What's the best way to contribute our code back for a feature like this?  So far for anything I've been working on, I've created reviews on Review Board with patche

Re: [REMINDER] Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272

Thanks Sonal. I understand the requirement but not the use case where this is needed, so was curious. -Nitin On 18/03/14 3:03 AM, "Sonal Ojha" wrote: >Hello Nitin, > >There was a requirement to control the publishing of events on the >messaging queue as opposed to how it is currently. At presen

RE: orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot Call

Thanks for the information Chris, I can check for the returned null to decide if the snapshot took place. Concerning that you are getting reports of it being orphaned though. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com --

Re: Cloudstack documentation

On Mar 18, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Thanks Wido, > > Cool, look like the rtd version is in there too. so I guest we need a lot > of work on conversion from publican to RST? It' already done :) I'd be mean I would tell you to search the mailing list :) If you search the clo

Re: orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot Call

Ah, yes. Now seeing this snippet I can explain the issue. So, during "orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot(work.getVolumeId(), work.getPolicyId(), work.getSnapshotId(), account, work.isQuiesceVm());” if an exception is thrown, it is caught and ignored by VolumeServiceImpl.takeSnapshot(VolumeInfo): @O

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 17.03.2014 22:39, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Edison Thanks for taking care of this issue. Nux can you try with this fix and I will go off building RC Animesh, can you also pull in the patches Jayapal wrote to fix the ipset issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6240 Than

Re: Cloudstack documentation

Thanks Wido, Cool, look like the rtd version is in there too. so I guest we need a lot of work on conversion from publican to RST? Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 514-447-3456, 1101 - - - *CloudOps*420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @Cl

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs pull request: add warning not to use "-Dmaven.test...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/2 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/ --- (Updated March 18, 2014, 1:46 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

RE: Java Coding Convention Errors

Here is a code fragment for serialization: result = (T)gson.fromJson(resultString, TypeToken.get(newObject.getClass()).getType()); It is just generic/single handler for all generic type corresponding to the same raw type. -Soheil From: Hugo

CLOUDSTACK-6240 patch

Hi Animesh, Uploaded the patch for CLOUDSTACK-6240 -ipset requires VM stop/start to get updated https://reviews.apache.org/r/19351/ Also updated the bug with the patch. Thanks, Jayapal

Re: Cloudstack documentation

On 03/18/2014 02:08 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: Hi all, I would like to know where we can get newer version of documentation for Cloudstack. Look like the documentation site is not updated since 4.2.0. I know that the documentation system will change, is their any information about it somewhere?

Review Request 19351: Fixed updating ipset on acquiring vm nic secondary ip for advanced SG zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19351/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and edison su. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot Call

All, I'm looking at the following issue[0]. The reporter says in the second sentence the method is always returning success even when an exception occurs or otherwise fails. Looking at the code, if the inside call to orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot raises an exception, it should bubble up and not

Cloudstack documentation

Hi all, I would like to know where we can get newer version of documentation for Cloudstack. Look like the documentation site is not updated since 4.2.0. I know that the documentation system will change, is their any information about it somewhere? Also, I would like to contribute as well. Thank

Re: CloudStack implementations

Cool idea, we can also have a monkey-brag ACS plugin which gives users an API which can be triggered via cloudmonkey cli tool or by some gui/button on the frontend to submit stats anonymously to our servers. Cheers. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 03/18/2014 12:

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #491

See

RE: CloudStack implementations

Wido +1 on that idea I know many people get nervous about such things for a FOSS project, so we would need to make sure that anything is transparent, is VERY careful about data and gives people the option to opt-out The simple fact is that we don't currently have any idea how many production d

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #490

See Changes: [Daan Hoogland] checkstyle: trailing spaces -- [...truncated 1527 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ xapi --- [debug] execute c

Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18677/#review37548 --- plugins/event-bus/rabbitmq/src/org/apache/cloudstack/mom/rabbitmq/R

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #489

See Changes: [Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-5432: potential bugs in case of stop mgt server while -- [...truncated 1430 lines...] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.6

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enhance the cloudstack events to include more information

Jira for tracking progress, and a design page on the wiki for any design info. > On Mar 18, 2014, at 6:34 AM, Sonal Ojha wrote: > > Shall I go ahead and open a jira item on this to add more details? > > >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Sonal Ojha wrote: >> >> Hello Nitin, >> >> I agree

Re: CloudStack implementations

> On Mar 18, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Do we have any general stats on how cloudstack is being used? Common > deployment sizes, largest deployments, etc? I'm curious as to how far > people have actually scaled it in real deployments, although I realize that > the info can be proprieta

Re: CloudStack implementations

On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 03/18/2014 12:07 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Do we have any general stats on how cloudstack is being used? Common >> deployment sizes, largest deployments, etc? I'm curious as to how far >> people have actually scaled it in real deployments,

Re: CloudStack implementations

On 03/18/2014 12:07 PM, Marcus wrote: Do we have any general stats on how cloudstack is being used? Common deployment sizes, largest deployments, etc? I'm curious as to how far people have actually scaled it in real deployments, although I realize that the info can be proprietary. Recently at

CloudStack implementations

Do we have any general stats on how cloudstack is being used? Common deployment sizes, largest deployments, etc? I'm curious as to how far people have actually scaled it in real deployments, although I realize that the info can be proprietary.

random template from zones

H Min, Edison, As discussed in a prior mailthread [1] templates being copied from a random zone was fixed in 4.3. The code is not present in master (or 4.4) is this solved in another way later on? The commit doesn't cleanly cherry-pick. It is hurting us in 4.2 so let me know if it pays cleaning it

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enhance the cloudstack events to include more information

I just noticed this here. I'm working on a plugin that we've chosen to implement in an event-based fashion, using the event bus. The event bus events have basically no information on them, and the database-recorded events have non-standard description formats which usually have useful information.

Re: QoS of VIF not working

Sorry,guys it's my mistake.i set up two mgmt server and forget to sync codes to another. On Mar 18, 2014 3:44 PM, "Yitao Jiang" wrote: > Hi, > > In CirtixResourceBase.java( > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.2.1/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResour

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enhance the cloudstack events to include more information

Shall I go ahead and open a jira item on this to add more details? On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Sonal Ojha wrote: > Hello Nitin, > > I agree with you, to start with we can replace the event descriptions to > include the resource UUIDs of the required parameters only. For example, > DetachIs

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enhance the cloudstack events to include more information

Hello Nitin, I agree with you, to start with we can replace the event descriptions to include the resource UUIDs of the required parameters only. For example, DetachIsoCmd needs only virtualMachineId as the required parameter. Hence, the event description should include the resource UUID for the v

Re: [QUESTION] distributed router and VPC routers

On 17/03/14 8:34 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Murali, > >I saw you checked in a lot of things in a branch called >distrubutedrouter. As I happen to know Karl Harris at sunguard is busy >at VPC RVRs. >Can you tell me how this is related? Daan, They are not related. Having a redundent VPC VR avo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > John, > > I could not reproduce the build failure on my dev setup, as mentioned earlier. > Also Jenkins seem to create awsapi 4.3 build fine without issues. Did you remove all your cached maven repos ? > > As to whether rampart maven depend

[PROPOSAL] Use Liquibase to manage DB changes

All, Following from the discussion of [1], I have written a small tool [2] to detect potential conflicts related to ACS DB changes. With the input supplied by that tool, I will proceed to check every commit since tag 4.2 up to the head of master. For every commit that introduces relevant changes

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 17.03.2014 22:39, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Edison Thanks for taking care of this issue. Nux can you try with this fix and I will go off building RC Works for me! Thanks! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: [REMINDER] Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272

Hello Nitin, There was a requirement to control the publishing of events on the messaging queue as opposed to how it is currently. At present, all events by default gets published over the queue. The idea was to have control over the types of events being published in the queue not necessarily as

CLOUDSTACK-1507

All, another bump from yesterday - if someone can assist I can get this knocked on the head. ** I'm going through Jira at the moment clearing up some old tickets. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1507 The issue above looks like a fairly straightforward change, can I ask someone

RE: CLOUDSTACK-2908

Hi All, just following up on the emails from yesterday - anyone any ideas on the below? Where would I expect to see the statement to set this up on reboot within the code? I've looked in the cloud-useage.in file where I would expect to see something and can't - is this the issue? An auto

Re: QoS of VIF not working

Ok, just a minute Thanks, Yitao 2014-03-18 15:49 GMT+08:00 Rajesh Battala : > HI Yitao, > Can you please raise a bug for the same with your findings. > > Thanks > Rajesh Battala > > -Original Message- > From: Yitao Jiang [mailto:willier...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:1

RE: QoS of VIF not working

HI Yitao, Can you please raise a bug for the same with your findings. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Yitao Jiang [mailto:willier...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: QoS of VIF not working Hi, In CirtixResourceBase.

QoS of VIF not working

Hi, In CirtixResourceBase.java( https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.2.1/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java) of createVif method , i see that the network rate value will be multiplied by 128 . if (nic.getNetworkRateMbps() != null && nic.ge