Re: CLOUDSTACK-5583: vmopsSnapshot plug-in (XenServer) does not return an error when it should

I tried to reproduce the issue the way you mentioned with few changes. I don't have iSCSI SAN on my setup. I connected a 2 GB disk that I presented as storage tagged NFS primary to CS. I created a 1GB disk offering and then deployed a VM on this new primary. Took a couple of snapshots like you ment

Re: Review Request 18971: CLOUDSTACK-6216: Skip the test if run on already existing setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18971/#review37169 --- test/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py

Re: Review Request 18970: CLOUDSTACK-6215: Updating test case to accomodate condition for VMware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18970/#review37168 --- Commit 768e91ef4560b15deb4804e3593b3ad22fa18eef in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 18970: CLOUDSTACK-6215: Updating test case to accomodate condition for VMware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18970/#review37166 --- Commit 286974488eab03efddfea35962161a224e997ab0 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 18970: CLOUDSTACK-6215: Updating test case to accomodate condition for VMware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18970/#review37165 --- Ship it! Ship It! - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On March 10, 2014,

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

> On March 14, 2014, 3:54 a.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > plugins/storage/volume/cloudbyte/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/lifecycle/ElastistorPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycle.java, > > line 99 > > > > > > Does th

Re: [20/31] git commit: updated refs/heads/distributedrouter to a8d43ba

Fixed with commit 16ddc3414ae0269ecb8903f670496e45f68d6ef6 On 13-Mar-2014, at 11:34 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Better yet, feel free to submit a patch that fixes it in addition to > the Jira :) > > --David > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> Konstantina, feel fre

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Min, in looking at this branch merge, I need to be reminded whether we are supposed to squash feature branches when they come in, or preserve history. It's nice to preserve history, but it's a lot easier to undo a squashed merge. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Min Chen wrote: > IAM branch is no

RE: Affinity Groups and Project

CLOUDSTACK-6237 Affinity Group should not display in project view due Affinity Groups feature does not support projects. has submitted. Thanks!! > From: saksham.srivast...@citrix.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Affinity Groups and Project > Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 05:41:16

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #425

See -- [...truncated 18053 lines...] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] <<< cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:cobertura (default-cli) @ cloud-awsapi <<< [INFO] [INFO] -

Secondary storage in Alert state

Hi, Secondary storage goes in to "Alert" state. Below logs was sniff before launching zone. It says "AgentDisconnected". After launching zone it creates SSVM & CPVM but am not able to ping public ip of any one of them. In DB Secondary storage still in alert state. SSVM health check shows everythi

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

Hugo Folks in USA will still have their day shining on 3/14. Can you cut it after the day in USA is over in PST time Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 8:28 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.or

RE: Anybody saw this error on master?

Sanjay has worked on vGPU for xenserver. AFAIK, new xenserver sdk is pushed and it is required. Are you able to build latest xenserver sdk in master. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 6:18 AM To: dev@cloudsta

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

What I think based on your comments are 1. Well, I have a different thought. I'd rather have separated classes instead of having a class with lots of methods, which makes the maintenance easier. And as you show as an example, it is possible to create a method and merge them, but I think it is bett

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

Lets say that we have the following setup to help clarify how this all works. CloudStack Management server is on: 10.10.10.2:8080 Swift Proxy servers are on: 10.10.10.3:8080, 10.10.10.4:8080, 10.10.10.5:8080 We have a load balancer setup on: 52.53.54.55:80 The load balancer is networked to both th

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #424

See Changes: [min.chen] Add ACL related DB schema. [min.chen] Populate default out-of-box acl roles, converted from ACCOUNT_TYPE [min.chen] Populate acl_group_account_map for existing accounts. [prachi] During Upgrade to 4

RE: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

The way to talk to swift endpoint, by using haproxy to redirect url request contains "/v1.0" to swift endpoint, so it assumes, the endpoint of swift is the same as cloudstack mgt server. Correct me, if I am wrong, I just try to figure how it works. But what if the swift endpoint is different fro

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

What are you referring to as the 'v1.0 url hack'? Bypassing the cloudstack management server is an intentional design decision to improve performance. The introduction of a load balancer in front of the two distinct services to maintain separation of their traffic is a good thing. I will review

Anybody saw this error on master?

Hi there, Anybody has seen this error on master? It is not blocking, but still an eyesore to see it in the log. 2014-03-13 16:31:54,357 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-8:ctx-87d8612e) Vm cpu utilization 0.08 2014-03-13 16:31:54,357 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (Direct

Re: Release cadence

The more I think about this, though, we can't really reasonably create an RC at Feature Freeze time. It's not generally until the week or two before Feature Freeze that features start coming into the master branch. We would need at least a couple weeks after Feature Freeze to perform our own inte

Re: Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the original setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/ --- (Updated March 14, 2014, 12:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shil

[REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

One comment on the "/v1.0" url hack, seems changing mgt server is unavoidable, would it be easier to add a new api in cloudstack, which can get the endpoint of swift server and the auth? And the UI change should be put under ui plugin: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+P

RE: Release cadence

+1 Radical proposition. Setting goals and exit criteria is good so project can be executed on time with expected level of quality. This is common for most of SDLC processes, that teams would stick to the agreed up on quality cycles and quality plans. Because of open source nature it might b

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

IAM branch is now merged to master. Thanks -min On 3/13/14 10:13 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Since we haven't heard of any objections to this merge for 3 days, I am >going to merge it to master today. > >Thanks >-min > >On 3/11/14 12:23 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: > >> >>On 11 mrt. 2014, at 19:52,

Re: Master is broken?

Fixed with commit d3fd66e9f555616530e483d1eacf2525556bf14e on master. Thanks -min On 3/13/14 4:34 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Yes, that is problem. Parameter name is changed to lowercase, which will >not be able to retrieve parameters from API job. > >Thanks >-min > >On 3/13/14 4:31 PM, "Daan Hoogla

Re: Release cadence

Exactly...it is not practical for 4.4 to spin up a RC so soon. Perhaps with more clearly defined criteria for 4.5, this may be possible. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: > Feature freeze and Merge criteria is not defined to change the mile

RE: Release cadence

Feature freeze and Merge criteria is not defined to change the milestone suddenly. We can create build and call it RC but that would take another 2+ months to harden to build next RC. There are only 50 defects logged for 4.4 so far. We are away from another 600+ defects to get acceptable RC ca

Re: Release cadence

I just think we need to call out expectations around test clearly in advance of the next release (4.5). Otherwise we'll be spinning up RCs for 4.4 for the next two months because people were treating it from a test perspective like they were treating prior releases. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:33

Re: Master is broken?

Yes, that is problem. Parameter name is changed to lowercase, which will not be able to retrieve parameters from API job. Thanks -min On 3/13/14 4:31 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >It's half passed midnight here so you won't get an answer soon from >this side of the ocean. > >The line >at com.clou

Re: Release cadence

I agree that we can't move to our end goal in on go. But I disagree that we should go on with business as usual right now. baby steps but never stop taking steps. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > My reasoning here is that otherwise we will just be futilely creating RCs >

Re: Master is broken?

It's half passed midnight here so you won't get an answer soon from this side of the ocean. The line at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:89) is from juli last year. So I doubt if Antonio knows about it. How does it involve the dispatcher refactoring? I noticed that the par

Re: Master is broken?

Thanks Min to look into it Kelven On 3/13/14, 4:14 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Min is about to submit a change as a part of her checkin. Antonio, its due >to Long/long auto boxing caused by your api validation stuff. Can you >please check other places that could get potentially affected? >

Re: Release cadence

My reasoning here is that otherwise we will just be futilely creating RCs for 4.4 since this expectation was not clearly defined ahead of the release. If we set expectations appropriately for 4.5, then we should expect we can begin RC building right after Feature Freeze for that release. On Thu,

Re: Release cadence

I think we should set that as a goal for 4.5. We should treat 4.4 as business as usual at this point and give "fair warning" for the next release. We should formally define what "tested" means for 4.5 and then take the appropriate course of action from a RC point of view. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at

Re: Master is broken?

Min is about to submit a change as a part of her checkin. Antonio, its due to Long/long auto boxing caused by your api validation stuff. Can you please check other places that could get potentially affected? Thanks, Alena. On 3/13/14, 4:10 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >Anyone encounter this problem

Master is broken?

Anyone encounter this problem on master? WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] (163545706@qtp-538020828-6:ctx-afe77737 ctx-06c20804) Received unknown parameters for command listRegions. Unknown parameters : listall WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] (1770041501@qtp-538020828-3:

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

Also, Punith has already refactored his code as I asked to put it in CloudByte-specific packages, so I think we're good to go. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > OK, if that's all we're checking, then I'm good with checking it in. > > Punith

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

OK, if that's all we're checking, then I'm good with checking it in. Punith - Can you just close out those last issues in the review? Thanks! On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Hi Mike, > >Seems some of your comments are related to the scope of their > implementation, su

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #423

See Changes: [Alena Prokharchyk] Removed getUUID() method from Domain interface as this interface already implements @Identity where getUUID is defined [Alena Prokharchyk] Fixed some problems reported by FindBugs -

RE: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

Hi Mike, Seems some of your comments are related to the scope of their implementation, such as do you support this, do you support that, can you do this, can you do that etc. From my point of view, it's not important, as the capability of driver is totally controlled by the vendors, vendors c

Re: Release cadence

That's how i like to see it and why I asked. Is there a reason people merge and then commit their features instead of rebasing and running a standard set of integration tests to validate before merging. I am not better then average on this myself but I think here is where we have room to improve if

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Alex, There are so many classes, and it makes it hard to see/review the feature. Can you come up with some sort of visual diagram, so its easier to see which component is responsible for what task, and how they interact with each other. My suggestions: 1) I think it would make sense to merge al

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

Hi Punith, Once you close out the open issues, we can work to get your code in. Feature freeze is Friday, March 14th, so we should do it sometime tomorrow. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37123 --- plugins/storage/volume/cloudbyte/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/

Re: Release cadence

I think many people (myself included) are used to performing rigorous, but focused feature-specific testing before feature freeze, but are under the impression that once feature freeze arrives that we are in integration-testing mode (where our feature is tested in combination with other features...

Re: Release cadence

Thats a very good point - we are effectively saying we know the features we merged in have potentially months worth of bugs. Though really, our hiccups don't seem to generally be in new features, it's old features. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Marcus wrote: > Its a good point. I had thought a

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 13.03.2014 21:24, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: [Animesh] Did you see this with prior RC too? [Animesh] Nux, security group support for advanced zone is limited and that too was developed in 4.2. I don’t think any changes have been made to that support since then. Can you call out what specific i

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

They are not called outside and only called from 'subscriber' classes and FullScanner class. Do you think these name changes are ok? - BaseInterface - UserInterface, AccountInterface, DomainInterface => APICaller - APIUserCaller, APIAccountCaller, APIDomainCaller - BaseService - U

review request hook for git

H, I concocted a git prepare-commit-msg hook. Please rant about my evening hobby after testing and reading DB=`git status | grep -e "modified.*\.sql$" -e "new file.*\.sql$"` OLD_MSG=`cat $1` if [ -z "$DB" ] then MSG="[DB-CHANGE] $OLD_MSG" else MSG="$OLD_MSG" fi echo "$MSG" >$1 regards, --

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:25 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@

Re: apache jenkins

A jenkins bug maybe? But fortunately it generates the rat report before it fails. Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.http.client.CredentialsProvider at org.apache.tools.ant.AntClassLoader.findClassInComponents(AntClassLoader.java:1365) at org.apache.tools.ant

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

You extract stuff into interfaces when the methods are meant to be called from different classes/Managers. Do you implement to add APIs for your plugins? Can your plugin be used by any other CS manager - RegionManager for example? If the answer is yes, then you would need an interface. If not, abst

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37109 --- The patch looks OK to me. When Mike is OK with your patch, then we c

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Patch B, 1. The reason why I use abstract classes instead of interfaces is because there are some basic methods that are used among the inherited classes, so I'm not sure why it has to be an interface. 2. These are the abstract base classes along with their inherited classes and they are grouped

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 12:41 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > On 13.03.2014 18:58, Nux! wrote: > > On 13.03.2014 00:26, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Alex, see inline. -Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungard.com>> Date: Thursday, March 13, 2014 at 1:00 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Chiradeep Vittal

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #422

See Changes: [Alena Prokharchyk] deployVm/startVm APIs: ability to define deploymentPlanner for VmToStart in the api call (available to ROOT admin only) [Alena Prokharchyk] More generic parameters that are not unknown [Ale

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Hi Alena, Patch B, I'm not quite familiar with java, so I have a little difficulty in following your recommendation. Can you send me an example using 'BaseInterface' and/or 'AccountInterface'? It will be very helpful and appreciated. Patch A, To reduce the number of requests to the remote regions

apache jenkins

H, Anybody have any idea what's eating the rat test? -- Daan

Re: Release cadence

Its a good point. I had thought about. Essentially we are saying that we know the features we just merged need another few months of work. On Mar 13, 2014 1:01 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > Just a thought, > > Why isn't the freshly cut branch the first RC from the get go? It is > quite sure not to

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Alex, I have some comments. Patch B. * You shouldn’t make your service a part of cloud-mom-rabbitmq plugin. Your subscribers/implementation are specific to your feature, and you need to introduce a special plugin just for your service. * AccountInterface and BaseInterface are still regular classe

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17790/#review37097 --- Patch B. * You shouldn’t make your service a part of cloud-mom-rabb

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 13.03.2014 18:58, Nux! wrote: On 13.03.2014 00:26, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: -1 In Adv SG zone assigning secondary IPs to a NIC doesn't update the ipset accordingly on the agent/hv; it requires stopping/sta

Re: How writing a new api of Pause VirtualMachine

But why would you want to pause a VM? Is this an end-user API or an admin API? From: Yitao Jiang mailto:willier...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 at 5:52 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.

Re: Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the original setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/ --- (Updated March 13, 2014, 7:08 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shila

Re: Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the orignial setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/ --- (Updated March 13, 2014, 7:06 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shila

Re: Release cadence

Just a thought, Why isn't the freshly cut branch the first RC from the get go? It is quite sure not to pass but it should cantain what we ant to ship feature wise. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > OK, so it sounds like a 3-month dev cycle for a four-month release was on >

Re: Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the orignial setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/ --- (Updated March 13, 2014, 7 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamka

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

On 13.03.2014 00:26, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: -1 In Adv SG zone assigning secondary IPs to a NIC doesn't update the ipset accordingly on the agent/hv; it requires stopping/starting the VM. It's not a traged

Re: Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the orignial setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/ --- (Updated March 13, 2014, 6:50 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shila

Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the orignial setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, sanjeev n, Santhosh Edukulla, a

Re: [20/31] git commit: updated refs/heads/distributedrouter to a8d43ba

Better yet, feel free to submit a patch that fixes it in addition to the Jira :) --David On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Konstantina, feel free to raise the Jira ticket for it. > > Thanks, > Alena. > > On 3/13/14, 8:46 AM, "Konstantina Chremmou" > wrote: > >>Hi, >> >

Re: [20/31] git commit: updated refs/heads/distributedrouter to a8d43ba

Konstantina, feel free to raise the Jira ticket for it. Thanks, Alena. On 3/13/14, 8:46 AM, "Konstantina Chremmou" wrote: >Hi, > >This commit adds a new parameter to ListVMsCmd, but no 'since' has been >specified in the parameter annotation. Please rectify. > >Thanks, >Tina > >-

[QUESTION] Creating an Ubuntu VM on XenServer from ISO

Hi, I'm having trouble creating a 64-bit Ubuntu VM on XenServer from an ISO, but if I manually go to XenServer and select the ISO, it works just fine. Well, it works just fine after I run this command on the VM: xe vm-param-set uuid=9e7ffaad-0c16-4d71-d17c-b1d58aa65bc2 HVM-boot-policy=BIOS\ order

Re: Release cadence

OK, so it sounds like a 3-month dev cycle for a four-month release was on purpose. Just curious...thanks :) On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:31 AM, David Nalley wrote: > This was (IIRC) part of the explicit decision in how to do things. The > thought being that if you are restricting what people can

[DB-CHANGE]

Please update your DB after getting commit 1b83698dac712e3497d4140b15c9fcba3870c705 in master ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vm_reservation` ADD COLUMN `deployment_planner` varchar(40) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'Preferred deployment planner for the vm’; -Alena.

Re: Release cadence

This was (IIRC) part of the explicit decision in how to do things. The thought being that if you are restricting what people can do with a release branch, people still need to be able to have a place to base their ongoing work; and master should be that place. Some features will take more than a cy

Re: Release cadence

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:42:26PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > Radical proposition: > > Because we have two problems, of different nature, we are in a > difficult situation. This is a possible solution, and I'd appreciate > you reading and considering it. Feedback is welcome. I propose that > af

Re: [Merge] CloudStack IAM branch to master

Since we haven't heard of any objections to this merge for 3 days, I am going to merge it to master today. Thanks -min On 3/11/14 12:23 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: > >On 11 mrt. 2014, at 19:52, Min Chen wrote: > >> Also, have already run FingBugs on our branch and addressed all new >> findings

Re: Release cadence

Yeah, if you "abandon" the "old" release as soon as a release branch is cut for it, then you essentially have three months on the new release before its release branch is cut and you move on to the newer release. I'm not sure that was the intent when such a schedule was created. It means we're rele

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #421

See -- [...truncated 18096 lines...] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] <<< cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:cobertura (default-cli) @ cloud-awsapi <<< [INFO] [INFO] -

Re: Release cadence

The overlap is simply a byproduct of cutting the branch, I'm not sure there's a way around it. It's a good point though, that essentially the window is 1 month shorter than I think was intended. Better testing will help that, however, with the point being that we shouldn't be doing a ton of work to

Re: Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17736/#review37066 --- Also why don't start routers in parallel? First, get all the router

Re: Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17736/#review37064 --- Also why don't start routers in parallel? First, get all the router

Re: Release cadence

I wanted to add a little comment/question in general about our release process: Right now we typically have a one-month overlap between releases. That being the case, if you are focusing on the current release until it is out the door, you effectively lose a month of development for the future rel

Re: Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17736/#review37061 --- server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java

Release cadence

The RC7 vote thread contained a lot of discussion around release cadence, and I figured I'd move that to a thread that has a better subject so there is better visibility to list participants who don't read every thread. When I look at things schedule wise, I see our aims and our reality. We have a

Re: [DISCUSS]{BEHAVIORAL-CHANGE]Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Chiradeep, Any comments on them? Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Alex Ough wrote: > And I also uploaded the patch B that includes new implementation to > support multi regions. > > Thanks > Alex Ough > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Alex Ough wrote: > >> I uploaded

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Created bridged network with ip-range reservation. Validated that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6232 is no longer an issue. Vm can be created in this network. The same bridged offering is created with Connectivity through NVP. VM gets created and seems fine. Created vpcs with

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Hi all, Outcome of more tests... So far, so good: * Environment - Management Server: Debian 7 VM under VirtualBox - DevCloud: XenServer 6.2 - MySQL: running on the DevCloud - System VM: Latest from http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/ * Create VPC - 1

Re: [CS4.1] Error during ip range creation

Yes : mysql> select * from vlan where vlan_gateway = '10.200.244.129' and vlan_netmask = '255.255.255.192' ; +-+-++-+---++++--+

RE: [20/31] git commit: updated refs/heads/distributedrouter to a8d43ba

Hi, This commit adds a new parameter to ListVMsCmd, but no 'since' has been specified in the parameter annotation. Please rectify. Thanks, Tina --- Guidelines for writing/modifying CS APIs: https://cwiki.apache

Re: [CS4.1] Error during ip range creation

Could you give more information? the vlan range you added, the vlans already exists in vlan table. 2014-03-13 15:43 GMT+01:00 : > we're using CS 4.1 > we are in Advanced (Cf zone in the Cloudstack UI) > All networks are 'Share', associated to 'Account'. > > > > Le 13/03/2014 15:16, Daan Hooglan

RE: [20/31] git commit: updated refs/heads/distributedrouter to a8d43ba

Hi, This commit adds a new parameter to ListVMsCmd, but no 'since' has been specified in the parameter annotation. Please rectify. Thanks, Tina --- Guidelines for writing/modifying CS APIs: https://cwiki.apache

Re: Review Request 18956: CLOUDSTACK-6147: Adding next set of tests for Dynamic Compute Offering

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18956/ --- (Updated March 13, 2014, 3:35 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edu

Re: [CS4.1] Error during ip range creation

we're using CS 4.1 we are in Advanced (Cf zone in the Cloudstack UI) All networks are 'Share', associated to 'Account'. Le 13/03/2014 15:16, Daan Hoogland a écrit : Nicolas, Which version are you running on? What is your setup (Basic/Advanced) is this network the only one? is it isolated/shar

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bridge functionality

Hugo, This is a common request from our SP customers but most have balked at the cost of developing a custom solution. It is an important feature for hybrid architectures, let us know how we can help. Certainly we will give feedback on the functional spec. Ian Ian Rae CEO, CloudOps Inc. 514-944-

Re: [CS4.1] Error during ip range creation

Nicolas, Which version are you running on? What is your setup (Basic/Advanced) is this network the only one? is it isolated/shared? etc. In short I have no idea, let's keep looking. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:08 PM, wrote: > nobody has any ideas for this error ? > > Le 12/03/2014 14:02, nicolas

Re: [CS4.1] Error during ip range creation

nobody has any ideas for this error ? Le 12/03/2014 14:02, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com a écrit : A lot of networks : mysql> select * from networks where broadcast_uri ='vlan://2013' ; +-+---+---+--+---+---+---

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #420

See Changes: [koushik] CLOUDSTACK-6052: List VM enhancement to support querying with multiple VM IDs -- [...truncated 18096 lines...] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

  1   2   >