Re: Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation

2014-02-11 Thread Wei ZHOU
mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install 2014-02-12 7:44 GMT+01:00 Giri Prasad : > Hello All, > > I have downloaded cloudstack 4.2.1 and trying to install it in my pc. The > system config is : i3 processor, 8 gb ram, 500 gb hard disk, 1 nic card etc > etc. > > The installed Redhat Linux kernel

Re: Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation

2014-02-11 Thread Mardan Raghuwanshi
hello giri, try to install 4.2.0, follow this link: https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/index.html and try to upgrade to 4.2.1 it should work Regards, --Mardan On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Giri Prasad wrote: > Hello All, > > I have

Problems with Cloudstack 4.2.1 installation

2014-02-11 Thread Giri Prasad
Hello All,  I have downloaded cloudstack 4.2.1 and trying to install it in my pc. The system config is : i3 processor, 8 gb ram, 500 gb hard disk, 1 nic card etc etc.  The installed Redhat Linux kernel 64-bit is: 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 1 01:33:01 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/L

Re: Code quality, QA, etc

2014-02-11 Thread Amogh Vasekar
On 2/11/14 3:54 PM, "Nate Gordon" wrote: >My goal is to eventually do a full build, deploy, configure, and >automated tests against a scratch built local cloud with every commit from >selected branches or daily from master (Hooray for nested virtualization >and excess hardware) Had done someth

Re: Review Request 17990: a broadcast type of a public network is affected by another physical network's isolation method

2014-02-11 Thread Sateesh Chodapuneedi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17990/#review34270 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On Feb. 12, 2014, 4:59

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

2014-02-11 Thread Saurav Lahiri
Prasanna, This is regard to the ticket 3471 that you had raised. Your suggestion was to have a cloudstack API. Based on the discussion and the way logging is generally handled, it was felt that a API might not be the best thing. I have documented a process to get a logging service enabled. I have a

Re: Review Request 17990: a broadcast type of a public network is affected by another physical network's isolation method

2014-02-11 Thread Marcus Sorensen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17990/#review34269 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marcus Sorensen On Feb. 12, 2014, 4:59 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

2014-02-11 Thread Mandar Barve
I think I get what you are saying. We should be using annotation per API class declaring sensitivity at class level. Using static methods returning predefined values is similar to this and annotation looks more elegant as what Nitin had suggested. At run time we will need to load this annotation an

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Hope the information @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+Backup+Object+Store+Plugin+Framework will help you in understanding this better. -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:25 P

Re: Review Request 17990: a broadcast type of a public network is affected by another physical network's isolation method

2014-02-11 Thread Yoshikazu Nojima
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17990/ --- (Updated Feb. 12, 2014, 4:59 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Marcus Sor

Review Request 17990:

2014-02-11 Thread Yoshikazu Nojima
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17990/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Marcus Sorensen. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6079 ht

Re: Review Request 17900: CLOUDSTACK-6066: Improved migration code to handle scenarios according to hypervisor type

2014-02-11 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17900/#review34266 --- Commit 3f1bed64ebd46b09cee4b1dd7c25d86640880f5c in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 17900: CLOUDSTACK-6066: Improved migration code to handle scenarios according to hypervisor type

2014-02-11 Thread Girish Shilamkar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17900/#review34267 --- Ship it! Committed to master and 4.3-forward - Girish Shilamkar

Re: Review Request 17116: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500( Fixed Few issues in patch 17113 )

2014-02-11 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/#review34264 --- Commit e6b93b0a6824a3f2845fb42596c04b348ae147e2 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 17900: CLOUDSTACK-6066: Improved migration code to handle scenarios according to hypervisor type

2014-02-11 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17900/#review34265 --- Commit 9174020d9a0b857f2ac1c8dd0c1df3cba429b58d in branch refs/heads

Re: failing to build noredist on 4.3 RC4 [solved]

2014-02-11 Thread Min Chen
Glad that you figured that out. Thanks -min On 2/11/14 2:52 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote: >Somewhere along the line I'd dragged to 'old' vim25.jar in, so was >building against an old version. > >Thanks for your help Min. > >Regards, > >Paul Angus >Cloud Architect >S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +4477114187

Re: Code quality, QA, etc

2014-02-11 Thread Nate Gordon
Sorry for being a few days late on this. I totally agree with the direction this conversation is going, but as someone who has done build engineering in various incarnations over the last couple of years, I would suggest two additional things. Build per branch and gitflow. We have had good succe

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Angus
Hey Sanjeev, I've got system VMs downloading from S3 to the NFS cache so hopefully things will come alive soon. Can you explain (or point me to the documentation) what gets cached and how long it's kept for etc. Also there was a bug fix "Cannot Deploy VM when using S3 object store without NFS

Re: [PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

2014-02-11 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Antonio, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios wrote: > Hi all, > > When invoking a CS API command that has parameters of type Map, the request > will be something like this: > URL/api?command=createTags&tags[0].key=region&tags[0].value=canada&tags[1].key=name&tags[1].val

[PROPOSAL][QUESTION] Map parameters in API Commands

2014-02-11 Thread Antonio Fornié Casarrubios
Hi all, When invoking a CS API command that has parameters of type Map, the request will be something like this: URL/api?command=createTags&tags[0].key=region&tags[0].value=canada&tags[1].key=name&tags[1].value=bob in order to send a Map with the pairs: tags{ region : "canada", name : "bob

Re: Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

2014-02-11 Thread Antonio Fornie
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ --- (Updated Feb. 11, 2014, 2:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

unable to remove xenserver host from a cluster properly

2014-02-11 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Should I fill a jira bug for this ? Using Cloudstack 4.2.1 managing a xenserver cluster (xenserver pool) running on 6.2sp1 Removing a XenServer from a cluster in Cloudstack does not remove if from xenserver pool. In previous version (4.1.0 + xs6.0.2) we were able to perform this task sucessfully

Re: Network Interface Files with bootproto DHCP

2014-02-11 Thread Nux!
On 11.02.2014 12:37, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: Hello all, I am trying to add network interface file for a secondary IP through code. The simplest way would be copying the file for the primary IP and changing required values accordingly. But it seems that as the boot protocol value is DHCP, the v

RE: CloudStack 4.2 and components.xml

2014-02-11 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
It would be really helpful if one of you could test the entire upgrade procedure and file defects. -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:58 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.2 and components.xml It sh

Network Interface Files with bootproto DHCP

2014-02-11 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
Hello all, I am trying to add network interface file for a secondary IP through code. The simplest way would be copying the file for the primary IP and changing required values accordingly. But it seems that as the boot protocol value is DHCP, the values such as ipaddress, netmask, gateway are no

Re: CloudStack 4.2 and components.xml

2014-02-11 Thread Wei ZHOU
It should be componentsContext.xml. And step 10 can be skipped. 2014-02-11 12:08 GMT+01:00 Jeff Hair : > Hi, > > I'm reading through the upgrade instructions for 4.0 to 4.1 and it says > that components.xml was moved to componentContext.xml. The upgrade > instructions from 4.1.x to 4.2 say comp

Re: Cloudstack 4.3 with hyper-v

2014-02-11 Thread Tejas Gadaria
Hi Devdeep Thanks for replay, FYI, I have installed CS through RPMs. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Devdeep Singh wrote: > If you are using a development environment you may see multiple mount > points getting created. I'll look into addressing this. You shouldn't see > this

RE: Cloudstack 4.3 with hyper-v

2014-02-11 Thread Devdeep Singh
If you are using a development environment you may see multiple mount points getting created. I'll look into addressing this. You shouldn't see this if you have installed cloudstack from rpm. The management server will clean up the mount points. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Yes , staging storage can be added after adding S3 storage. For adding staging storage we have createSecondaryStagingStore API. Please see the api doc http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/root_admin/createSecondaryStagingStore.html For adding S3 we use addImageStore API with provid

Re: Cloudstack 4.3 with hyper-v

2014-02-11 Thread Tejas Gadaria
Hi Rajesh, Thanks for replay, but multiple mount point are necessary? because all three mount point contains files and sub-directory with same name and size. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote: > Mount point you are seeing is used to copy the systemvm.iso to

CloudStack 4.2 and components.xml

2014-02-11 Thread Jeff Hair
Hi, I'm reading through the upgrade instructions for 4.0 to 4.1 and it says that components.xml was moved to componentContext.xml. The upgrade instructions from 4.1.x to 4.2 say components.xml exists again: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-

RE: failing to build noredist on 4.3 RC4 [solved]

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Angus
Somewhere along the line I'd dragged to 'old' vim25.jar in, so was building against an old version. Thanks for your help Min. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Angus
Thanks Sanjeev for the explanation, 1. can the staging area be added after the S3 storage is added or does it have to be done at the same time (I can't see a 'staging' api command) 2. the adds3 api documentation doesn't include anything about staging areas - what are the arguments? (I'll file a

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Hi, At least one NFS Staging storage is needed in each zone to copy storage artifacts from S3 to primary and vice-versa. While adding S3 storage NFS staging storage is optional because we can add more than one S3 storage in a region. So for every S3 storage addition we don't need to add NFS sta

RE: Cloudstack 4.3 with hyper-v

2014-02-11 Thread Rajesh Battala
Mount point you are seeing is used to copy the systemvm.iso to secondary storage. -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Cloudstack 4.3 with hyper-v Hi, Secondary storage mou

Re: Review Request 17120: added an extra column to mark the imported ldap users as from ldap

2014-02-11 Thread Rajani Karuturi
> On Jan. 24, 2014, 6:52 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > I see many files unrelated to this fix have been updated and present in the > > patch. > > Please can you update the patch with changes needed for the fix only? > > > > Following are some such files. > > api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountServic

Cloudstack 4.3 with hyper-v

2014-02-11 Thread Tejas Gadaria
Hi, Secondary storage mount point entry recorded multiple time on management server which is I think not necessary. I have created one instance, It's working fine. [root@hyperv ~]# df -hT FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root ext4 3

RE: S3 based secondary Storage

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Angus
Success! (some) I changed the endpoint to s3.amazonaws.com last night and it failed, but actually because download.cloud.com wasn't responding, I tried again today and it uploaded - Cool. BUT now, CloudStack is complaining that I don't have a cache/staging storage... I thought that the staging

Review Request 17941: CLOUDSTACK-6075: Increase the ram size for router service offering

2014-02-11 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6075 http

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

2014-02-11 Thread Nux!
On 11.02.2014 00:50, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) Is it okay to leave the HA issue for subsequent RCs? http

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

2014-02-11 Thread Daan Hoogland
You are right in your analysis but about the methods you are drawing the wrong conclusion. We want each class to have its own values, not each command object. Any BlaCmd should have exactly the same values so it makes sense to make them static on the class object. About the variables; I see how m

Re: Review Request 17541: Externalized the hard coded strings

2014-02-11 Thread Vetrivel Chinnasamy
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17541/ --- (Updated Feb. 11, 2014, 8:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Brian Fede

Contrail plugin - VirtualMchineModel

2014-02-11 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
Hi guys, We are working with FindBugs and trying to get Scariest and Scary bugs fixed on the master branch. FindBugs has reported a bug on the contrail plugin, in the VirtualMachineModel class. If you check the Checking the commit id cc2b1c4961244d9c3d8b452f1dcaa6614e56d11a, you will see the f