Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

I've done some more work on the networking - it would be good if this could be tested. I'll leave the issue open until I get some feedback that it looks ok. Please feel free to add other issues on github if you find other bugs. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > oopss.. s

Re: What is your setup?

I will definitely go with Xen any day. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Just a general question > > What is YOUR favorite setup? KVM? Xen? VmWare? > > - Maurice > -- Skype: Frankie.Onuonga twitter: Frankieonuonga irc #freenode: Frankie.onuonga

RE: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

Tejas, This is how the api command looks like to create primary and secondary storage. command=createStoragePool&zoneid=581bc2b6-0295-40e0-90ed-2717e239c2b6&podId=896cff2e-d51e-454b-97ed-cab078bf3be2&clusterid=3785c58a-d891-4482-9e6f-72f2060b80d3&name=ps&scope=cluster&url=cifs%3A%2F%2F10.102.192.1

Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

Hi, I am not able to attach primary storage in Cloudstack as cifs. So what I am doing wrong OR what are the issues with primary storage.? Regards Tejas On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Tejas Gadaria wrote: > Hi Paul, > > forgot to mention, > > hyper-v agent is running. > > Regards, > Tejas > >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Yes he did and I missed seeing that, Murali responded to me already > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 6:24 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Murali Reddy > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third

What is your setup?

Just a general question What is YOUR favorite setup? KVM? Xen? VmWare? - Maurice

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Hi Animesh - I see that Murali did call out cherry-pick request for the same bug today morning. Is it not the same ? Commit 2e004878b1da0f7fb5ec12e77babbb626e96c1ef in branch refs/heads/4.3-forward CLOUDSTACK-5967: GRE tunnel creation is failing On 05/02/14 5:53 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrot

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

You should use the RC3 artifact in VOTE email https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ > -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:59 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudSt

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

On 06.02.2014 01:52, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Folks I need more feedback on this RC so that we can hopefully have the next RC as the last one. If you have not played / tested with this RC please do so now and share your feedback. I have some time for testing in the upcoming weekend, are these

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Murali can you put up a fix in 4.3-forward branch? Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:08 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) > > Hi Animesh, >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Folks I need more feedback on this RC so that we can hopefully have the next RC as the last one. If you have not played / tested with this RC please do so now and share your feedback. > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday

Xen Server Setup

Has anyone setup a public facing cloudstack with Xen server. I want to be able to provide the internal systems with a 10.x IP address along with a public facing IP address. I have read the manual multiple times, I cannot seem to get this; if anyone has a tutorial that might help I'd love to re

Re: Review Request 16523: Unit tests for Juniper contrail VM Interface Model and Instance Ip Model class.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16523/ --- (Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 11:23 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) - CLOUDSTACK-6031 Virtual Router count not displaying in UI Infrastructure Screen

Jessica, Great news, many thanks. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Jessica Wang [mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com] Sent: 05 February 2014 22:19 To: Geoff Higginbottom Cc: dev

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) - CLOUDSTACK-6031 Virtual Router count not displaying in UI Infrastructure Screen

Geoff, I just fixed CLOUDSTACK-6031 in 4.3-forward branch. Jessica -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:29 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) -1

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Talluri, Is it possible to enable assertions in the functional tests (-ae flag on the jvm). That way we get some feedback on the internal issues. I'm seeing some issues in master and it would be good to get that feedback from 4.3 as well. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone > On 4 feb. 2014, at

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Hi Animesh, The bug ID is CLOUDSTACK-5967, Murali (Reddy) and Tuna have been dealing with it, the information that came patch had not been pushed came from Tuna today. Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Origi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

I encountered the reboot in DevCloud2 as well ( http://markmail.org/message/6j6i2wjpknx3vrnz). I hope this can be fixed in the next RC (although not a blocker, I am not sure if it is a DevCloud only issue) I also noticed that the number of VR (CLOUDSTACK-6031) is reported as zero, although if you c

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Folks need more feedback on this RC besides the one from Daan, Geoff, Paul. Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 2:59 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #243

See

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

> -Original Message- > From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 8:50 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) > > -1 > > OVS/GRE Tunnel on XenServer patch not yet pushed from Master to 4

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #242

Me bad :-( Forgot to commit a file as part of the fix. Will push it in a few. Cheers, Hugo On 5 feb. 2014, at 19:17, jenk...@cloudstack.org wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [rajesh.battala] Fixed agent code to handle untagged public

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #242

See Changes: [rajesh.battala] Fixed agent code to handle untagged public vlan while parsing the vlan id -- [...truncated 1014 lines...] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notif

Review Request 17748: Solve fixBugs finding

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17748/ --- Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland. Repository: cloudstack-git D

create zone on master is failing

Has any one else faced this issue on latest master? ===START=== 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 -- GET apiKey=KFzBif3dP05fiswvBQinoXhTuCIJ1486joeuFF00K4t4NRfASfuO3NAu91V0_RaCDa-2-iRO-1RS1yTQY7-OVA&name=Sandbox-simulator&guestcidraddress=10.1.1.0%2F24&dns1=10.147.28.6&response=json&command=createZone&signatur

Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6023 https:

Re: Command Login Response

It turned out to be in this file: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServer.java Thanks, Wil On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > would it be this code? > server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java > > Thx, > > ws > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > >> I am h

Re: Command Login Response

would it be this code? server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java Thx, ws On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > I am having a hard time finding where the 'login' response is generated in > CloudStack. > > Can someone point me to the file that formats the response to the login >

Command Login Response

I am having a hard time finding where the 'login' response is generated in CloudStack. Can someone point me to the file that formats the response to the login command? Thanks, Will

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #241

See Changes: [htrippaers] Fix camelcasing inconsistency causing an assertion error. [htrippaers] SnapshotDetailsVO doesn't have a display field even though it is required in the searchbuilder in ResourceDetailsDaoBase --

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6023) Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

Nithin, you are right about it being a hypothesis. It is being tested in a live cloud at Schuberg Philis as we 'speak' it runs a patched 4.2.1 version. I committed my change to 4.3-forward. We decided to let you scale to twice your initial number of cpu no matter how many there where to begin with

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

-1 OVS/GRE Tunnel on XenServer patch not yet pushed from Master to 4.3 Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 03 Februa

CloudStack stops the machine for no reason

Hello, Today I've submitted this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6036 Could someone confirm the existence of the problems after the migration from 3.0.2 to 4.2.1. -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6023: Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

Hello, In the test environment: ACS 4.2.1 + compute offering (1 cpu, 1GB RAM) XCP 1.1 - User vm instance (CentOS) sees 32 processors XS 6.2SP1 - user vm instance (CentOS) sees 1 processor, I don't have XS 6.0.2 and 6.1 in my lab. 2014-02-05 Daan Hoogland : > we see host crashes because of l

Re: Create GRE tunnel failed in 4.2 with XenServer.

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Thanks Tuna, is this patch in RC3? > I need to make another patch to make GRE work with XenServer. Now just only work with XCP and KVM, patch in master branch. I will push all of works to 4.3 as soon as possible. --Tuna

Re: Review Request 14023: NetworkManager Exception Fix Due to call to getDhcpServiceProvider()

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14023/#review33694 --- Ship it! 6523c068695d0431070060667c222eb40d54b14d - daan Hoogland

Re: old review request regarding NetworkManager (now NetworkOrchestrator)

On 02/02/14 4:07 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Murali, > >You commented to Soheils commit (https://reviews.apache.org/r/14023) >That it should be redone for present day master. Is this still valid, >meaning I just did should I check it in? Daan, bug is still valid, if you have made change in Net

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6023: Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

we see host crashes because of large posts to pool-masters that are due to this. The fix reduces the size of these posts. When we device a more elegant solution I am all for it but at the moment the fix is the most sensible protection against those crashes. the way this causes crashes is because i

Re: Create GRE tunnel failed in 4.2 with XenServer.

Hi guys, Appologize for delay response. I just came back from Lunar New Year vacation. I spent time to discover the GRE issue on XenServer 6.2. Now I know exactly the problem. Here is: + No problem with ovstunnel script, it works well with XCP, KVM and XenServer. + The idea to create GRE tunnel

RE: Create GRE tunnel failed in 4.2 with XenServer.

Thanks Tuna, is this patch in RC3? Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: ng.t...@gmail.com [mailto:ng.t...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Nguyen Anh Tu Sent: 05 February 2014 14:16 To: Mural

Re: Error: The snapshot chain is too long -> lot's of left over LVM snapshots?

Looking at the manual it seems to me that: 1. Cloudstack creates lvm copy of the disk. 2. Copies the content of this created "snapshot" to secondary storage 3. Removes the lvm snapshot, while leaving the copy intact on the secondary storage. Therefor no LVM snapshots should be visible in XenCente

Re: CloudStack usage calculation doesn't work?

CLOUDSTACK-4533 2014-02-05 Indra Pramana : > Hi Wei Zhou, > > Yes, I am using version 4.2.0. Any known bug related to usage server on > this version? > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > Cheers. > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > Are you working on 4.2.0?

[ACS4.3][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-5967 GRE tunnel creation is failing

Animesh, Can you please cherry-pick the commit in 4.3-forward into 4.3 branch for the bug CLOUDSTACK-5967. Branch: refs/heads/4.3-forward Commit: 2e004878b1da0f7fb5ec12e77babbb626e96c1ef Parents: 09e27fd Author: Murali Reddy mailto:muralimmre...@gmail.com>>

4.3 features with hypervisor differences

Hi everyone, I'm updating my deck on hypervisor differences for 4.3, and I'd like confirmation of what I understand made the cut. Feedback welcome. - Hyper-V 2012 R2 added (Donal, I'll be hitting you up to confirm all the HV stuff) - vSphere 5.5 added and supporting identical features to vSphere

Found a little gem among the reviews..

Just pushed review 16080 through. Netscaler plugin is now part of the regular build! :-) Cheers, Hugo

Re: Review Request 16080: Move Netscaler plugin from non-oss to oss and upgrade the nitro API to 10.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16080/#review33691 --- Ship it! commit 356daf3eed7dd817f07da2b7ef57ced9b0eb6fe7 Author: Sy

Error: The snapshot chain is too long

Hi, i'm using CS 4.1.1 on XS6.0.2 + Hotfixes up to XS602E026. Recently one of our volumes will not get new snapshots created, because of this error: WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-278:) ManageSnapshotCommand operation: create Failed for snapshotId: 478, reason: SR_BACKE

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: > CLOUDSTACK-6031 -1 (binding) because the issues my colleague Joris encountered (CLOUDSTACK-6020, CLOUDSTACK-6023 and CLOUDSTACK-6024) where not new to 4.3 I didn't want to put a -1 on that, but as a new bug is discovered as well; these

Re: Review Request 17638: Rest client moved to utils. Nvp extended.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17638/#review33690 --- Antonio, Good stuff. Could you include some documentation on how p

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

-1 The UI no longer shows the correct number of Virtual Routers - it always show ZERO even when there are multiple VRs running. Logged as CLOUDSTACK-6031 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Me

Re: CloudStack usage calculation doesn't work?

Hi Wei Zhou, Yes, I am using version 4.2.0. Any known bug related to usage server on this version? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Are you working on 4.2.0? > > > 2014-02-05 Indra Pramana : > > > Hi, > > > > When I installe

Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

Hi Paul, forgot to mention, hyper-v agent is running. Regards, Tejas On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Tejas Gadaria wrote: > Hi Paul, > > yesterday when I was trying to add secondary storage with > /hcloud/secondary , In logs I was not able to see much activity, but > storage got attached. >

Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

Hi Paul, yesterday when I was trying to add secondary storage with /hcloud/secondary , In logs I was not able to see much activity, but storage got attached. I have uploaded screenshot in previous mail. I have reattached the secondary storage, and it logs are Trying to add a new data store at ci

Re: Review Request 17638: Rest client moved to utils. Nvp extended.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17638/ --- (Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 10:28 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

oopss.. sorry.. didn’t look at the issues list on github :) I will work on the mount issue. Thanks, ~Rajani On 05-Feb-2014, at 3:16 pm, chris snow mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Rajani, Many thanks for the feedback. I still have to figure out the network setup - I have created an i

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

Hi Rajani, Many thanks for the feedback. I still have to figure out the network setup - I have created an issue on github to track this. There is also an open issue for the mount problem. https://github.com/snowch/devcloud/issues?state=open Please feel free to raise any other defects that you

Review Request 17736: CLOUDSTACK-5999: Virtual Router does not start if Guest VM is rebooted from CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17736/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Murali Reddy. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5999 https