Review Request 17583: [Hyper-v] can't get console access after vm live migration for 3 minutes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17583/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Re: volume lifecycle issue expunging

:) Thanks Animesh On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:32 PM, "Marcus" wrote: > CLOUDSTACK-6000 > > Sounds like a vacuum cleaner. > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: >> Yeah, unfortunately our code should be a bit more robust in this area. The >> second (or more) time around, the

RE: CLOUDSTACK-5406

Francois, Bug CLOUDSTACK-5406 was related to snapshot size and secondary storage count. For your issue, can you paste the response of listAccounts API for the account you are trying to deploy VM with; this will help us to check the resource_limit set for your account and what is the resource_co

Disks in ACS Vmware

Hello, In ACS KVM the volumes attached are seen as normal disk /dev/vda /dev/vdb and so on. But with vmware it seems Volume Groups are being used. The root device is /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol100 which previously it was /dev/hda. So now when I attach a new datadisk to vm running on vmware wha

Re: volume lifecycle issue expunging

CLOUDSTACK-6000 Sounds like a vacuum cleaner. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Yeah, unfortunately our code should be a bit more robust in this area. The > second (or more) time around, the failed deletion of a file should probably > not cause us trouble if, in fact, the

RE: Xen StorageMotion Fails

Hi Francois, This looks like an issue in cloudstack. Can you file a bug with the details? Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 6:48 PM To: Srikanteswararao Talluri Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org S

RE: CLOUDSTACK-5406

No, its the same thing as the ticket describe. I tried to lunch a VM, and the resource limit was reached for my account even if there was no volume running at all. FG On Jan 31, 2014 12:15 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" wrote: > Hi Francois, > > Can you please explain what is the impact you are seeing in

RE: EC2 Rest Servlet "domain cannot be null!!" Error In Advanced Networking Mode

Jeff, what you have reported is a bug. Created an issue to track it in in JIRA - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5998 . BTW you mentioned that you trying EC2 Query API against a setup with Advanced networking? I just want to point out that AFAIK, we have never tested EC2 REST/S

RE: CLOUDSTACK-5406

Hi Francois, Can you please explain what is the impact you are seeing in primary storage count. Is it the negative value of primary storage count or something else. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 5:23 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Font question in GUI

Anyone know if there is already a JIRA ticket open for this issue? If not, I can open one. Thanks! On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Marcus wrote: > yep > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a minor issue. > > > > Has anyone else noticed when y

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

With the char set know, it would be easy to decode the password than the previous encoded version. This is a concern because even for ldap users we also check authentication against db. Thanks a lot for taking Daan and Ian. ~Rajani On 31-Jan-2014, at 1:20 am, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi, >

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round)

Formally cancelling this VOTE. I have picked up a number of issues from 4.3-forward besides the SSL offload API response issue. I am almost ready to push the 3rd RC. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:54 PM To: dev@cloudstack.a

Re: StratosphereSsp

Hi, The response name is obtained from the annotation, because I really did not want to put typo in String itself. Note s_name is usually private, and getCommandName() responds. list* command is not there because simply we did not need it. It might be better to have list* command, but it will tak

Re: Review Request 17348: VPC support for contrail plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17348/#review33282 --- Ship it! Applied to master. Thanks! - Sheng Yang On Jan. 31, 20

RE: StratosphereSsp

Hiroaki-san I will wait on your comment from Alena when I review your commit db3dc2ee17c699f1abf42ea2fbe09ec2748caa4a it's adding new APIs now which is late for 4.3 Animesh -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30,

RE: 4.3 commit cherry pick

Hiroaki I am waiting on resolution on concern from Alena in other thread -Original Message- From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:ka...@stratosphere.co.jp] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:35 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.3 commit cherry pick Hi, I found that our plugin was br

RE: 4.3 commit cherry pick

Pulling in to 4.3 now -Original Message- From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 6:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi Subject: Re: 4.3 commit cherry pick Hi Animesh, Please cherry pick the following commits from 4.3-forward to 4.3 branch. 7255

Review Request 17576: Detect & log unknown parameters for CS API and refactoring

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17576/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: cl

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #459

See

Re: Review Request 17348: VPC support for contrail plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17348/ --- (Updated Jan. 31, 2014, 12:19 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --

RE: CLOUDSTACK-5406

Copying the folks that worked on it -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:49 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-5406 Hi, I saw this bug as been fixed for the secondary storage limits in 4.3: CL

CLOUDSTACK-5406

Hi, I saw this bug as been fixed for the secondary storage limits in 4.3: CLOUDSTACK-5406 But it seems to impact the primary storage limit count as well, at least in 4.2.1. Is the primary storage count fixed in 4.3 (I can't test right now) as well? Thanks! -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte

Re: XenServer SR Question

Great - thanks! I was just trying to make sense of the numbers. :) On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > I'll need to confirm with engineering, but that makes sense. I'll also see > if there is a different format specifier in the XenCenter string > On Jan 30, 2014 6:27 PM, "Mike

Re: XenServer SR Question

I'll need to confirm with engineering, but that makes sense. I'll also see if there is a different format specifier in the XenCenter string On Jan 30, 2014 6:27 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Hi Tim, > > You are correct that I was looking at XenCenter. Below is the output from > xe. > > It looks l

Re: Review Request 17348: VPC support for contrail plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17348/#review33274 --- plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/org/apache/cloudstack

RE: [4.3.0] CloudStack diff of Commit 2f2adad50827f2249353d0258f3b5642a849479a vs 4.3.0-SRC

-Original Message- From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:31 PM To: Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [4.3.0] CloudStack diff of Commit 2f2adad50827f2249353d0258f3b5642a849479a vs 4.3.0-SRC Thanks for the remark, Anime

Re: Urgent : Network stuck in implementing state

Thanks, I got one step further and the NPE is not coming up but I guess I need to change the overall network state :? 014-01-30 15:23:16,159 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-67:job-1218 = [ 7de934e0-2b42-476b-83da-cf03109331fa ]) Network is not implemented: Ntwk[212|Guest|16]

Re: XenServer SR Question

Hi Tim, You are correct that I was looking at XenCenter. Below is the output from xe. It looks like physical-size (below) corresponds to total in XenCenter, physical-utilization (below) corresponds to used in XenCenter, and virtual-allocation (below) corresponds to allocated in XenCenter. Does t

Re: Font question in GUI

yep On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > This is a minor issue. > > Has anyone else noticed when you return to the GUI from another window that > sometimes the GUI's font has changed? > > To get the GUI to switch back to the expected font, I have to refresh it by > cl

Re: XenServer SR Question

I'm assuming that's the value from XenCenter. What does the cli say? I could see this being just a formatting question. On Jan 30, 2014 5:59 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know how a XenServer SR could (correctly) say more space is > being used than is allocated? > > This is wh

Font question in GUI

Hi, This is a minor issue. Has anyone else noticed when you return to the GUI from another window that sometimes the GUI's font has changed? To get the GUI to switch back to the expected font, I have to refresh it by clicking on one of the buttons in the left-hand pane. Typically I use Chrome.

Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list

I have the same experience as Marty several times. This is why I started taking up this job, hoping we could structurally improve on it. But the only use I have had of my work is for my own good and interest. So some doubts creeped in. I think I have seen enough positive reactions in this thread to

XenServer SR Question

Hi, Does anyone know how a XenServer SR could (correctly) say more space is being used than is allocated? This is what the Size field of one of my shared SRs says: Size: 20.1 GB used of 80 GB total (20 GB allocated) I would have expected used to be <= allocated at all times (typically I'd expec

Re: volume lifecycle issue expunging

Yeah, unfortunately our code should be a bit more robust in this area. The second (or more) time around, the failed deletion of a file should probably not cause us trouble if, in fact, the file is gone (regardless of whether or not your delete command actually deleted the file or it was gone for so

Re: [4.3.0] CloudStack diff of Commit 2f2adad50827f2249353d0258f3b5642a849479a vs 4.3.0-SRC

Thanks for the remark, Animesh. However, after the -1 from Geoff with regards to the problem with firewalling, port forwarding and load balancing on the UI, it seems a bit pointless to test the release without Jessica fixes, imho. Cheers, Wilder Sent from my iPhone > On 30 jan. 2014, at 20:0

Re: volume lifecycle issue expunging

My one hesitation is that it may cause problems by surfacing other bugs. For example, say a delete operation succeeds in deleting the image file, but fails in some subsequent code. The next time it runs, it may fail in deleting the image file (file not found), and thus get stuck in an endless loop

Re: volume lifecycle issue expunging

I agree, Marcus. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Marcus wrote: > I think there's a hole in the volume lifecycle. I've been noticing > volumes lingering that should have been cleaned up, and it seems to be > a bug in the state machine for the volumes: > > s_fsm.addTransition(Destro

RE: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list

+1 Measurable implies manageable. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: 30 January 2014 17:49 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list > > It gives me an idea of the volume of such reques

volume lifecycle issue expunging

I think there's a hole in the volume lifecycle. I've been noticing volumes lingering that should have been cleaned up, and it seems to be a bug in the state machine for the volumes: s_fsm.addTransition(Destroy, Event.ExpungingRequested, Expunging); s_fsm.addTransition(Expu

Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list

I find the report useful, unfortunately I find most requests from one off users end up never being responding to by the op (which I would say is more a mailing list issue - I had this issue when I sent my first question). On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citri

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to cb073e0

Yes, will fix that in a min. -Alena. On 1/30/14, 12:52 PM, "Wei ZHOU" wrote: >Alena, > >Should the line > sb.and("zoneId", sb.entity().getZoneId(), SearchCriteria.Op.LIKE); >be SearchCriteria.Op.EQ ? > > > > >2014-01-30 > >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master 13e6c2fe7 -> cb073e063 >> >

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to cb073e0

Alena, Should the line sb.and("zoneId", sb.entity().getZoneId(), SearchCriteria.Op.LIKE); be SearchCriteria.Op.EQ ? 2014-01-30 > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 13e6c2fe7 -> cb073e063 > > > listAutoscaleVmProfiles: added zoneId to the list of optional api > parameters > > > Project

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

Hi, Sorry about the delay in replying to this have been doing exams at uni all week. Daan's change looks to change Rajani concern. Might be me being naive but I fail to understand the concern fully... The given character selection was roughly 72 with a string of length 20. If my math is correct

RE: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

-Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:20 AM To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: daan.hoogl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters No. This particular commit has changes in may files, and change

Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

No. This particular commit has changes in may files, and changes are so random, so its hard to say the purpose of each. I would advise to: 1) revert the commit altogether 2) Split changes into several separate commits based on purpose 3) Define clear purpose in the commit description before pushin

RE: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

Alena Is the offending change restricted to this file only https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f=server/src/com/cloud/api/query/vo/UserVmJoinVO.java;h=2bb0783595e7f6b5957cb94588a3cdd035baff55;hp=25079ca59f5d0ce0dabffcccb0b05972ea9e7a35;hb=dcda79e2c02fda4e0fe52f61bf

RE: [4.3.0] CloudStack diff of Commit 2f2adad50827f2249353d0258f3b5642a849479a vs 4.3.0-SRC

-Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:48 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [4.3.0] CloudStack diff of Commit 2f2adad50827f2249353d0258f3b5642a849479a vs 4.3.0-SRC Attachments are stripped from this

StratosphereSsp

Hi Hiroaki-san, I’ve seen that you’ve added 2 new api commands to 4.3-forward branch: addStratosphereSsp and deleteStratosphereSsp. There is one thing that needs to be fixed – the response name is not set in those commands. Check how “s_name” parameter is defined in other API commands, and plea

Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list

It gives me an idea of the volume of such requests. On 1/30/14 3:34 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen >wrote: >> Definitely, somehow we have to find a way to make sure that all >>questions get answered. > >I agree but don't have the feeling that my

Re: [4.3.0] CloudStack diff of Commit 2f2adad50827f2249353d0258f3b5642a849479a vs 4.3.0-SRC

Attachments are stripped from this mailing list. From: Wilder Rodrigues mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Thursday, January 30, 2014 7:56 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: EC2 Rest Servlet "domain cannot be null!!" Error In Advanced Networking Mode

You can check the compatibility of the query API here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/rgHVAQ Largely based on the SOAP service support. On 1/30/14 3:59 PM, "Jeff Hair" wrote: >Hi Chiradeep, > >In this case it's the REST service being used by an external application. >Don't the API tools

Re: EC2 Rest Servlet "domain cannot be null!!" Error In Advanced Networking Mode

Hi Chiradeep, In this case it's the REST service being used by an external application. Don't the API tools use the SOAP service? Jeff On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > AFAIK, it works with a very specific version of the API tools > http:

Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

Daan Did you review this thread? Thanks Animesh On Jan 29, 2014, at 3:50 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > Daan > > This is from the recent commit that you cherry-picked into 4.3. These > unintended consequences was my reason not to change so late. Anyhow please > review > > Animesh > >

Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Definitely, somehow we have to find a way to make sure that all questions get > answered. I agree but don't have the feeling that my weekly exercise is serving this goal.

Review Request 17541: Externalized the hard coded strings

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17541/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Brian Federle. Repository: cloudstack-git D

Re: EC2 Rest Servlet "domain cannot be null!!" Error In Advanced Networking Mode

AFAIK, it works with a very specific version of the API tools http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Instal lation_Guide/aws-ec2-user-setup.html On 1/30/14 1:42 PM, "Jeff Hair" wrote: >I should clarify that we are using 4.2.1 stable release with VMWare. > > >On Thu

Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list

On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H everyone, > > I've been putting out weekly reports on both the user - and the dev > lists about unanswerred questions. I feel like dropping the one on the > dev list. As I had not much feedback on them I was thinking of > dropping both but

dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list

H everyone, I've been putting out weekly reports on both the user - and the dev lists about unanswerred questions. I feel like dropping the one on the dev list. As I had not much feedback on them I was thinking of dropping both but forcing myself to scan the old users mail still seems like a valid

[4.3]more limited ldap fix

Animesh, at your convenience please pull 5651081ac0a32ba88c7446f079a5d3a8dca47feb 'Revert "Fix findbug issues within LDAP authenticator"' (or revert 9776e1af1c92486f5081b1ee8fa95cf0edb86b97) and then pull in ce7c6d23575d455a8273b77702a56b7bb419b37b hopefully this mitigates Rajani's concerns.

[Responsiveness report] users 2014w03

http://markmail.org/message/6zkqyqf4qg3e6lgx Xen crash big problem with disk by Paolo De Marco http://markmail.org/message/tx6xp4afgzijcqxx cs 4.2.1 vm vmware wrong volume type thin and NOT thick by Domenico De Monte for an explanation of this report see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa

Re: 4.3 commit cherry pick

Hi Animesh, Please cherry pick the following commits from 4.3-forward to 4.3 branch. 7255e50f2051aff1cb5e1991e2dde4ef48f57454 888b90677623da745a01db0a5087272f0dabe42c Thanks, Jayapal On 30-Jan-2014, at 2:36 PM, Jayapal Reddy wrote: > Hi Animesh, > > Can you please cherry pick commit to 7255e5

[GSOC2014] Ten Years of Google Summer of Code - GSoC 2014 is coming

All, ASF is again going to apply for the Google Summer of Code program, see the email from Ulrich Stark below. If you want to be a mentor and have an idea, please read the email and enter your ideas in jira with the proper labels. Make sure to read the 'guide to be a mentor' as this is a time i

Re: EC2 Rest Servlet "domain cannot be null!!" Error In Advanced Networking Mode

I should clarify that we are using 4.2.1 stable release with VMWare. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jeff Hair wrote: > Hi, > > We're trying to query the EC2 REST API. Most of it works, but we're > running into an issue when calling describe addresses. It returns a fault > with "domain cannot

Re: Add new KVM hypervisor host into CloudStack

Hi Indra, >- Same distribution version, is it referring to same OS and version? E.g. >Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise)? I think you need to have the same distribution and same version on all the hosts. >- All hosts must be homogenous, does it mean that the new server has to be >exactly the same chassis, m

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

Guys, I found two reported issues of category 'scary'. To satify Rajuri's concerns I would like to revert Ian's commit and checkin two changes that change returning byte[].toString() into Arrays.toString(byte[]) on return statements of generatePassword methods. if no objections come in within a f

RE: API documentation

There are many such issues. Can we chart down something concrete ? My suggestion is simple: Volunteer can pick up one feature each and fix all issues related to the API documentation: Description, build (can take help from infra), how-to info Experts, please advise. -Original Message-

RE: Xen StorageMotion Fails

I used the UI for the vm migration. I can get you the exact api call but isnt the call in the pastebin output already.. Another thing, if there is a vm running on the same network on the destination host, I dont have the exception but the volume stay in migrate state forever. Thanks Francois On

Review Request 17535: Added few fixes for CLOUDSTACK-5973

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17535/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5973 h

EC2 Rest Servlet "domain cannot be null!!" Error In Advanced Networking Mode

Hi, We're trying to query the EC2 REST API. Most of it works, but we're running into an issue when calling describe addresses. It returns a fault with "domain cannot be null!!" as the error text. I've traced this down to CloudStack not setting the EC2 domain (standard or vpc) in the EC2SoapService

Re: cloudstack presenting wrong used memory values

I am using xen-hypervisor 4.1 and XCP 1.6 if I am not mistaken. I have also never noticed this used memory values until we deployed Zenoss to monitor the cloud. I just noticed that because the Zenoss was generating a graph that presented whole cloud memory usage and it was a little weird. With hig

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

Animesh, Ian, Can you comment on this? I couldn't find any findbugs issues of the the scariest kind in yesterdays version of the 4.3 branch. What was solved that needs to go in in spite of Rajuri's reservations? thanks, Daan On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Sorry Rajani

Re: RSA Keys & Deployment on Windows

Anything On 1/30/14 12:42 PM, "Alex Hitchins" wrote: >Thank you. I'll get this updated later tonight. I shall put it in as a >note rather than a step instruction. > >Can I now amend any area of the Wiki or just that one page? I do >sometimes see small things that I could easily tidy up. > > > >A

RE: RSA Keys & Deployment on Windows

Thank you. I'll get this updated later tonight. I shall put it in as a note rather than a step instruction. Can I now amend any area of the Wiki or just that one page? I do sometimes see small things that I could easily tidy up. Alex Hitchins +44 7788 423 969 -Original Message- From:

Re: RSA Keys & Deployment on Windows

Done On 1/30/14 11:35 AM, "Alex Hitchins" wrote: >My username is _alex_hitchins > >If I could have edit access I can get this in to the page. > > >Alex Hitchins >+44 7788 423 969 > >-Original Message- >From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >Sent: 30 January 2014 10:

Re: API documentation

On Jan 30, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > This is worrying/odd - 4.3 (RC1) has 431 API calls (according to a > Cloudmonkey), 4.2.1 has 458 Are you sure you are not testing a nonredist 4.2.1 ? (like with vmware stuff) 4.3 is only oss > > 27 calls have gone walkabout including addvmwar

RE: API documentation

I can certainly give it a go. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 30 January 2014 12:15 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: API docu

RE: API documentation

This is worrying/odd - 4.3 (RC1) has 431 API calls (according to a Cloudmonkey), 4.2.1 has 458 27 calls have gone walkabout including addvmwaredc which started this conversation Any ideas anyone? Is it a cloudmonkey bug? Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418

Re: API documentation

It's this. I've been meaning to rectify it for the 4.1 and 4.2 documentation, but haven't had the cycles. Paul, if you want to update the documentation[0] for how we generate API docs so that we build it with everything, great. Even better if you want to build it and then submit a patch for updati

Re: Review Request 16249: CLOUDSTACK-5496 : Account included in ActionEvents is Project Account ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16249/#review33216 --- Ship it! 5de9ae0bceddd751ae7f59fa4b7aec1d13f8bf59 - Murali Reddy

Re: Review Request 16249: CLOUDSTACK-5496 : Account included in ActionEvents is Project Account ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16249/#review33215 --- Commit 5de9ae0bceddd751ae7f59fa4b7aec1d13f8bf59 in branch refs/heads

Review Request 17532: CLOUDSTACK-5992: default values of configuraiton parameters in configuration table are set NULL on fresh setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17532/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5992 http

Re: Review Request 17142: CLOUDSTACK-5916: associateIpAddress" leaves an IP in allocating state

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17142/#review33213 --- Commit 85d0f8f93aaf118e0597fcbba0f4cf06efa9df1f in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 17142: CLOUDSTACK-5916: associateIpAddress" leaves an IP in allocating state

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17142/#review33214 --- Ship it! 85d0f8f93aaf118e0597fcbba0f4cf06efa9df1f - Murali Reddy

RE: RSA Keys & Deployment on Windows

My username is _alex_hitchins If I could have edit access I can get this in to the page. Alex Hitchins +44 7788 423 969 -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: 30 January 2014 10:57 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: RSA Keys & Deploy

Re: 4.3 commit cherry pick

Hi, I found that our plugin was broken, so please cherry pick db3dc2ee17c699f1abf42ea2fbe09ec2748caa4a in 4.3-forward. (2014/01/30 18:06), Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi Animesh, > > Can you please cherry pick commit to 7255e50f2051aff1cb5e1991e2dde4ef48f57454 > 4.3 branch > from 4.3-forward

Re: API documentation

I found following 3 APIs related to adding load balancer devices absent in the documentation. 1. addExternalLoadBalancer 2. addF5LoadBalancer 3. addNetscalerLoadBalancer Regards, Gaurav On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:09 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > > > H

Re: [DISCUSS][findbugs] proposing fixes or just do it

;/that would mean the code generator has a serious bug. Beter waste time in that code mobile bilingual spell checker used Op 30 jan. 2014 12:03 schreef "Chiradeep Vittal" < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>: > Just do it. Although, I suspect that piece of code may be generated from > the API WSDL > >

Review Request 17531: CLOUDSTACK-5440 - Added new guest OS types.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17531/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: [DISCUSS][findbugs] proposing fixes or just do it

Just do it. Although, I suspect that piece of code may be generated from the API WSDL On 1/30/14 9:38 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Alex and others, > >I hesitate to ask you as it seems obvious, but in the awsapi project >in com.cloud.bridge.model.SObjectItem.equals(Object other) a >comparison i

Re: bof for denver

Nice, like it On 1/29/14 9:31 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H, > >I submitted a bof proposal: continuous delivery the apache way > >the apache release process is based on high quality and delivering >good quality software. for a big project as cloudstack this means >unsure delivery schedules and l

Re: BVT report on 4.3 branch

Hey Daan, It is a mistake while clubbing two reports #1174 and #1175. Thanks for pointing out. Initially there are 12 failures in #1174 and when I reran #1175 there are indeed only 3 failures overall. Thanks, ~Talluri On 30/01/14 3:48 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Talluri, > >in the report su

Re: RSA Keys & Deployment on Windows

Looks specific to Windows. What is your user id on the Wiki? On 1/29/14 4:22 PM, "Alex Hitchins" wrote: >All, > >I've rebuilt my development environment from the 4.3 branch. In >rebuilding, I hit upon a number of errors namely around ssh keys >(id_rsa.cloud & id_rsa.cloud.pub). When running the

Re: API documentation

On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hey Radhika, > > Yes, I'm happy to do what I can (probably mainly harassing other people) > > CloudMonkey says that there are 431 API calls (in 4.3 RC1) I recon there are > 409 listed on > http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/TOC

Re: API documentation

Hey Paul, Great that you are concerned with the documentation. I don't think you can expect that people implementing stuff because they need it can be expected to document it. Unfortunately the second person to use a new feature falls the responsibility to interrogate the guilty party and produce

[Question] Cloudstack API : parameter "listall"

Hi all, When we send a request to CS API there are general parameters and command-specific parameters. Once the command object is created in the mgmt server, all the command specific parameters are assigned to the corresponding command object properties. For most *ListCmd classes, there is a prope

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

Sorry Rajani, I had seen no reaction to Ian's explenation and the request by Animesh to pull it so I just did. let me look into it for a minute On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > I see that the commit 9776e1af1c92486f5081b1ee8fa95cf0edb86b97 is already > pushed to 4.3. I

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round)

On 29.01.2014 22:52, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: -1 I am unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist. I did create a Port Forwarding Rule via the API successfully to prove it's just a UI issue. VMs assigned to VPC's fail to deploy

Re: BVT report on 4.3 branch

H Talluri, in the report summary for xen it says >Fail :5 but i only see these 3 >test_loadbalance/ 0 3 0 am i missing something? (the kvm failures seem to match the summary) when I folow the links I see 12 and 3 failures respectively. I'm sure I'm

RE: API documentation

Hey Radhika, Yes, I'm happy to do what I can (probably mainly harassing other people) CloudMonkey says that there are 431 API calls (in 4.3 RC1) I recon there are 409 listed on http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/TOC_Root_Admin.html I'll try to find which ones are missing. I thi

Re: Add new KVM hypervisor host into CloudStack

On 30.01.2014 08:57, Indra Pramana wrote: Hi, It's time for me to add new KVM hypervisor host into our CloudStack and I read these requirements: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html - Same distribution version

  1   2   >