Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

Good point. These are the kinds of things we should be aware of right now. Even though we don't necessarily want to bite off too much right now in initial implementation, we want to plan so that certain things we may want to do aren't impossible. I was thinking either the cloud provider would have

RE: cidrs in acls

Daan, Similar to firewall_rules_cidrs, separate table can be used to store acl cidrs. Maybe in network_acl_item_cidrs. Regards, kishan > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 1:05 AM > To: Kishan Kavala > Cc: dev > Su

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> >> H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6 >> configuration with your bullet list present. Comments are still >> brainstorming phase quality but hopefully they

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #74

See

Re: Issue in creating template from volume in vmware hypervisor

Sorry, below are the log when creating a template from volume DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-24:) ===START=== 10.1.21.110 -- GET command=createTemplate&response=json&sessionkey=PNVhAvI3UFBE8S9IvNGiTkVwWIE%3D&volumeId=83a10514-ee39-4311-8737-08c2e4067b61&name=vmconverttmpl&displayText

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

Are we assuming that the Cloud Provider has a Provider-Independent (PI) space? Using a Unique Local Address (ULA) space for the VPC *might* to desirable. If VPC tiers (subnets) can span zones (not possible today), then NAT66 can help keep addresses stable as workloads move to a different zone for a

Re: Review Request 16249: CLOUDSTACK-5496 : Account included in ActionEvents is Project Account ID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16249/#review32129 --- changes look good, patch does not apply on master. Can you please re

RE: The commit ba96c8cadfa4b1dc7ee74fdb26ba5cea87e29b91 breaks a clean installation

> -Original Message- > From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers > Sent: 15 January 2014 20:26 > To: SuichII, Christopher > Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; sate...@apache.org > Subject: Re: The commit ba96c8cadfa4b1dc7ee74fdb26ba5cea87e29b91 breaks a > clean installati

Issue in creating template from volume in vmware hypervisor

Hi, guys, In production environment, i set up one zone with one pod and two clusters, one for xenserver and one for vmware. In xen cluster have two xenservers 6.1.0 , and one EXI 5.0.0.Each hypervisor have it's fc-san shared storage, and ssvm, cpvm all runs in xenserver. All works well except when

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #73

See Changes: [Alena Prokharchyk] CLOUDSTACK-5870: API support for retrieving user data [sheng.yang] CLOUDSTACK-5779: Refactor mechanism for calling routerProxy in CitrixResource [sheng.yang] CLOUDSTACK-5779: Moving bumpUpPriority, ed

Review Request 16999: statistics collection stops when xapi HANDLE_INVALID is thrown

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16999/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Wei Zhou. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5890 https://i

Re: Devcloud update for 4.3

I also get the following error when I try to launch an instance the tinylinux template. This time I was trying with NFS-based primary storage and uselocalstorage = false. I did not get this error earlier. The tinylinux template settings indicate that it is Centos 5.6 x86_64. INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.Asy

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2115

See

Re: [ACS43] QA and Test Tasks ... Upgrades

Sudha, I'll be doing a lab test for 4.1.1 to 4.3 On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Hi All, > > Has anyone trying upgrades for ACS 4.3 from ACS 4.x versions ?? > 4.2 and 42.1 will be covered in our lab. Wondering if anyone else is trying > upgrades as RC is approaching

[Responsiveness report] users 2014w02

http://markmail.org/message/qkhhpelmvwgrrruv Some questinos about Accounts, Users Domains and Projects by Hollman Enciso R. http://markmail.org/message/vghxregk5r62job7 Add a node to an existing clvm cluster by Bjoern Teipel http://markmail.org/message/4vc7343egrf5ruch Remove/migrate NFS secondary

CloudStack Bay Area Meetup

Hi All, The next CloudStack Bay Area Meetup is scheduled for Jan 28th with details below. The location is SAP Labs office in Palo Alto. Hope to see you there in large numbers! Date: Tuesday, January 28th, 2014 Time: 6:00pm - 8:30pm Details: Registration & Pizza / Refreshments / Beer from 6:00pm

Re: Devcloud update for 4.3

All the while, I was using my own NFS based secondary storage and I Was downloading the systemvm templates from jenkins. I made the secondary storage point to 192.168.56.10:/opt/storage/secondary (I used the maven deploySvr script to configure the whole thing). I edited the 'host' parameter in Glob

RE: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 151c239

QA has been testing with 64 bit templates in 4.3 from the beginning. Only change requested now is to change version number which is referring to older templates. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:35 AM To: dev@cloudstack.a

CloudStack 4.2 | Cent OS 6.4 | KVM

Greetings, Ongoing issues with advanced network setup. If someone could please humor me as to what I am doing incorrectly. I have everything under one server, KVM / storage / etc. I have a block of IPs public facing. I also have 192.x for private network. All the system VM's spin up and are

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Saurav, I don't see why you can't benefit from having other services redundant as well. Vpn might be a problem as the source ip of a redundant router pair on a vpn might give a problem (maybe there is an implementation) but why wouldn't you want redundant dhcp or dns services? As I understand it th

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 386b467

sorry Wei Zou, David, I take that back. only people with large cidr lists that upgrade to 4.2.1 will suffer indeed. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > it seems to me it is not for those who will run into a to large cidr > list. For those installations the management server up

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 386b467

it seems to me it is not for those who will run into a to large cidr list. For those installations the management server upgrade step will fail and the ms will stop. both the alter table and the altered create statement are needed. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > alter table is

Re: Devcloud update for 4.3

Yes. The below script was executed on the SSVM and it was able to connect to the management server on port 8250. Management server is 192.168.56.31. Checking connectivity. Good: Can connect to management server port 8250 <\snip> Thanks Prabhakar On 1/16/14 12:24 PM, "Wei ZHOU" wrote: >Can y

Re: Devcloud update for 4.3

Can you ping 192.168.56.31 from SSVM ? 2014/1/16 Prabhakaran Ganesan > Yes, Edison. I restarted the management server. Here is the output of SSVM > health script. > > root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh > > First DNS server is

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 386b467

alter table is good enough. 2014/1/16 Daan Hoogland > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > but that won't help people doing > > an upgrade as they will pass by the 410to420 script. > > > reading the source we are both right. I will add the alter table > statement as well

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 386b467

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > but that won't help people doing > an upgrade as they will pass by the 410to420 script. reading the source we are both right. I will add the alter table statement as well (to 4.3 and 4.4 scripts)

Re: Devcloud update for 4.3

Yes, Edison. I restarted the management server. Here is the output of SSVM health script. root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh First DNS server is 192.168.56.1 PING 192.168.56.1 (192.168.56.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.

Re: Review Request 16974: (ACS4.3) Juniper Contrail Plugin fixes

Hi Hugo, These fixes are blocker for contrail plugin. We missed this fix while submitting patches to ACS. Thanks, Sachin From: Hugo Trippaers mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com>> Reply-To: Hugo Trippaers mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com>> Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:01 AM To:

RE: CS4.1+xenserver 6.1 snapshot error

Hello Chandan, The logs as following, any suggestions? Great thanks, William ### 2014-01-16 06:18:14,775 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-194:null)

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 1 of 2

Hi Karl, It's glad to see your work! But please try to keep the conversation in one thread... On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Karl Harris wrote: > I started posting my initial comments in JIRA and was advised > dev@cloudstack.apache.org is the place to post/ask/communicate. > > Here is a set

RE: Devcloud update for 4.3

> -Original Message- > From: Prabhakaran Ganesan [mailto:gprab...@juniper.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Devcloud update for 4.3 > > Hi Edison > > Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to debug why the template is not

Re: UI blocker

On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Brian Federle wrote: >>> Did you happen to check the View Users page ? the api/secret keys display >>> is being truncated. > > Yes, though to fix that I'll have to rework a bit of the detail view layout > to allow more flexible sizing for long strings. File that a

RE: UI blocker

>> Did you happen to check the View Users page ? the api/secret keys display is >> being truncated. Yes, though to fix that I'll have to rework a bit of the detail view layout to allow more flexible sizing for long strings. File that as a separate bug for the next release and I'll take a look a

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 386b467

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:32 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Why do this in 410to420? It won't get corrected on upgrades that are > already at 4.2.x - realistically it probably needs to be in a 421to422 > if we plan on a 4.2.2 or 421to430. it doesn't mean it won't be done. alter table network_acl_item

cidrs in acls

H Kishan, I see you implemented CLOUDSTACK-763. it merges a lot of cidrs into one field. The api doesn't check the field length. I enlarged the field in the create table statement to 2048 for the 4.3 branch. Can you help me think about a more solid solution, please. It seems to me those cidrs shou

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6 > configuration with your bullet list present. Comments are still > brainstorming phase quality but hopefully they will lead to something. > > > * VPC has no global IPv6 prefix (

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 386b467

Why do this in 410to420? It won't get corrected on upgrades that are already at 4.2.x - realistically it probably needs to be in a 421to422 if we plan on a 4.2.2 or 421to430. --David On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:22 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.3 c375ec62e -> 386b467ef > > > CLOU

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > Sorry for jump in late. > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> I've discussed this a bit with various subject matter experts at our >> datacenters/business, and so far we're leaning toward a rollout like

Re: Devcloud update for 4.3

Hi, I confirmed that the system VMs agents are UP. But the 'tiny linux' template is not downloaded, with status "No route to host". The secondary storage vm doesn't seem to have connectivity to outside world. Is it expected to download the template directly from download.cloud.com (or some oth

Re: Review Request 16974: (ACS4.3) Juniper Contrail Plugin fixes

Agreed - there seems to be a ton being dumped into the contrail plugin. If it wasn't working by feature freeze then we should wait. If all of these are bugfixes, I'd expect to see more bugs filed and referenced in commits, but instead have been seeing commits that seem to expand the functionality o

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

Hi Marcus, Sorry for jump in late. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I've discussed this a bit with various subject matter experts at our > datacenters/business, and so far we're leaning toward a rollout like > this: > > * VPC has no global IPv6 prefix (super CIDR as curr

RE: CS4.1+xenserver 6.1 snapshot error

Hello Willam, The logs that you posted doesn’t contain information about why BackupSnapshot failed. From the grep information, I can only see the following line in the logs "The result for com.cloud.agent.api.BackupSnapshotCommand is BackupSnapshot Failed due to Task failed! Task record: uuid:

Re: UI blocker

On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > Don't see any issues in the screenshot you posted. The variation in font size > and weight, color, etc. are used to show contrast between content and titles. > Sorry but I do not see this as a blocker issue :) Though feel free to tweak > the

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 151c239

I remember this discussion for 4.2.1: http://markmail.org/thread/fgamr5ca67pmcelo but it does not look like 64bit templates made the code freeze. On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:35 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Again; why are we changing sysvm arch this close to release? > > Please see my earlier thread abo

Re: Review Request 16867: Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16867/ --- (Updated Jan. 16, 2014, 7:12 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

master build fails

Hugo, build fails due to check style error in the file you’ve added: /Users/alena/repos/dr/cloudstack/tools/appliance/convert/Convert.java /Users/alena/repos/dr/cloudstack/tools/appliance/convert/Convert.java:8: Line has trailing spaces. /Users/alena/repos/dr/cloudstack/tools/appliance/convert/C

Re: Review Request 16974: (ACS4.3) Juniper Contrail Plugin fixes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16974/#review32050 --- Are these fixes release blockers or can they go into 4.4? The releas

Review Request 16974: (ACS4.3) Juniper Contrail Plugin fixes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16974/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

RE: UI blocker

Don't see any issues in the screenshot you posted. The variation in font size and weight, color, etc. are used to show contrast between content and titles. Sorry but I do not see this as a blocker issue :) Though feel free to tweak the fonts yourself. -Brian -Original Message- From: se

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to 151c239

Again; why are we changing sysvm arch this close to release? Please see my earlier thread about this. --David On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.3 e49a60c54 -> 151c23981 > > > CLOUDSTACK-5868 Default templates are still referring to older templates in

Re: 4.2.1 upgrade bug

hate that you (have to) admit to being surprised about that piece of proza. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:13 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> 4.3 and higher tests will folow, of course > > Hate that you ran into it, but thrilled by the above sentence. > > --David

Re: 4.2.1 upgrade bug

> > 4.3 and higher tests will folow, of course Hate that you ran into it, but thrilled by the above sentence. --David

4.2.1 upgrade bug

LS, On upgrading our second production env to 4.2.1 we encountered a bug (at Schuberg Philis): during the migration of firewall_rules_cidrs.source_cidr to network_acl_item.cidr. The source_cidrs are concatenated into a 255 width field. We are using cidr lists that are way longer. As a quick fix

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to f562579

This would mean some pretty interesting upgrade steps for folks. This would have to be thoroughly tested before bringing this into a release I think. +1 on postponing this to 4.4 Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone > On 16 jan. 2014, at 18:41, David Nalley wrote: > > Why are we now changing th

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.3 to f562579

Why are we now changing the systemVM to 64 bit?? We are well past feature freeze, past even RC-generation on the schedule. Is there a reason this shouldn't be reverted? --David On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:45 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.3 4ccc74e76 -> f562579e2 > > > update xe

CS4.1+xenserver 6.1 snapshot error

Hi Guys, I have issues of snapshot on some vms, I using cloudstack 4.1 and xenserver 6.1. The following are the error logs, any ideas or suggestions will be great appreciated. Any other question, if I want clean the error snapshot, how can I achieve it? As I try to clean it in Cloudstack manageme

RE: About Improving GRE & Autoscaling features

Hi Tuna, I appreciate your help. I have used: - CloudStack 4.2.0, Ubuntu package obtained from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/precise/4.2/ - Citrix XenServer 6.2.0 from http://www.citrix.com/products/xenserver/overview.html Feel free to contact me for more details. Best Regards,

Re: Public vs Private

Ah right - Forgot to add the right routes, I'm dumb. Apologies. - Maurice On 1/16/14, 11:15 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote: Hello, I am setting up CloudStack I have a quick question about network connectivity. I have a block of 18 IP addresses, 96.x IPs. I proceeding to setup my installation of Cl

RAT build failure

Edison, Can you have a look at the new nexenta code? It appears to break the RAT build due to missing headers. Cheers, Hugo

Public vs Private

Hello, I am setting up CloudStack I have a quick question about network connectivity. I have a block of 18 IP addresses, 96.x IPs. I proceeding to setup my installation of Cloudstack, with my 96 as guest IPs and the 192.x IPs for the private side of things. Looking at the system virtual machi

Re: About Improving GRE & Autoscaling features

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:09 PM, sebgoa wrote: > I am copying Tuna and Chiradeep who have the most experience with this. @Sebastien: I'm busy with some exams that week. So I will look into Florin's problem on weekend. I will put GRE and AutoScaling code to 4.2.x branch as well. @Florin: What e

Re: checkstyle problems...

That sounds good, Hugo - thanks! On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Yeah, > > swapping out branches is a tricky thing in eclipse. I generally use two > workspaces, one for master and one for current release branch. > > I noticed that when you swap branches eclipse keeps th

Re: rvr4vpc

Yes, that's how i read it. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Karl Harris wrote: > Daan, > > A little bit of clarification. > > Listed below is the paragraph I was referring in this > description

[EVENT] CloudStack Collaboration Conference

Hi, We are excited to have the 2014 CloudStack conference co-located with Apache Con in Denver from April 9-11th. Register and Submit talks early so we can plan a great program: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-north-america/attend/register -Sebastie

Re: Review Request 16540: CLOUDSTACK-5692: cleanup API response for primary/secondary storages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16540/ --- (Updated Jan. 16, 2014, 1:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Si

Fwd: rvr4vpc

Daan, A little bit of clarification. Listed below is the paragraph I was referring in this description : - Redundant router capability. (v3.0.3 and greater) Available only

RE: Hyper-V

Hi Paul, >From the logs it looks like you have setup the zone in Basic mode. Basic mode >is right now not supported for Hyper-V. Can you set it up in Advanced mode and >see if it works? Regards, Devdeep P.S. I just tried setting up the zone in Basic mode and confirmed I got the same exception

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Daan, So looking at what is available today for guest network, the Redundant VR can be enabled only for the source nat service. I guess the mention of the source nat router is in relation to that. I could be wrong though. It appears that the other services like vpn, dhcp, dns do not benefit much f

Re: cs 4.2.1 vm vmware wrong controller and volume type

I was wrong about controller scsi. VM was created with scsi virtual device node. Anyway thin disk still be used instead of thick ( which we used to create template ). Waiting for your reply Regards

cs 4.2.1 vm vmware wrong controller and volume type

Hello, we use CS 4.2.1 with vmware 5.1. We create vm templates with disk thick lazy and controller scsi. We register templates with controller scsi. We cannot choose to If we deploy a vm from template, it is created with

RE: HyperV agent is called CloudPlatform

+1 > -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: 16 January 2014 09:53 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; Donal Lafferty > Subject: HyperV agent is called CloudPlatform > > Hi, > > I just noticed a recent commit by Radhika on documentation

RE: Hyper-V

I've got the System VMs creating, but not starting now... Error seems to be: POST response is[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer":{"result":false,"details":"com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand fail on exceptionObject reference not set to an instance of an object Agent log: http://pastebin.com/zhfXi

Re: building devcloud

On 14/01/14 6:31 pm, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi Abhi, > >The code to automate devcloud building never had worked for me which >is why the last one I had published by created by hand [1]. At the >time last year there was some issue with Ubuntu, so Debian instead was >used. I can help create new ve

Re: building devcloud

On 14/01/14 9:12 pm, "sebgoa" wrote: > >On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > >> Hi Abhi, >> >> The code to automate devcloud building never had worked for me which >> is why the last one I had published by created by hand [1]. At the >> time last year there was some issue with Ubun

RE: UI blocker

Paul Angus has just sent me a screenshot (possible the line break css change the other day) - it looks fairly similar only some difference in line breaks. When I get my dependency issue resolved I'll look in deeper. Alex Hitchins +44 7788 423 969 -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto

Re: UI blocker

On Jan 16, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > Just got latest to take a look and there is a dependency issue - looking at > this now. > > Are you on a retina screen? I just wonder if this has any effect on the font > sizing etc. no, I tried Safari 6.05 and Chrome 32.0 > > > Alex Hi

HyperV agent is called CloudPlatform

Hi, I just noticed a recent commit by Radhika on documentation about Hyper-V agent: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git;a=blob_plain;f=en-US/hyperv-agent-install.xml;h=5580b90637e864affd144f125dc89c05c42f6fce;hb=c6069b1 Can't you rename the .msi with CloudStack ? -Seba

Re: checkstyle problems...

Yeah, swapping out branches is a tricky thing in eclipse. I generally use two workspaces, one for master and one for current release branch. I noticed that when you swap branches eclipse keeps the “old” checkstyle config, but without any of the limitations place on it by the poms, because thos

RE: UI blocker

Just got latest to take a look and there is a dependency issue - looking at this now. Are you on a retina screen? I just wonder if this has any effect on the font sizing etc. Alex Hitchins +44 7788 423 969 -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 January 2014

UI blocker

Hi, after testing 4.3 I entered a blocker due to UI issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5882 It would be good to discuss, thanks, -Sebastien

Re: About Improving GRE & Autoscaling features

On Jan 15, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Florin Dumitrascu wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > I have an advanced zone with GRE isolation. Trying to create the first guest > VM instance fails, guest VM and router VM deployment fails. > The trace in my management server log is similar to the one described by > s